Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Russians DON'T NEED BAKHMUT Anymore. They "WANT IT". Putin's UNHEALTHY OBSESSION REVEALED" video.

@mr.galaxy3762 Umm the support is basically around less than one 1e in taxes per person. Europe haven't really invested into this, they have just gave their old stockpiled weapons and tanks.
7
@ItsJustTsukii why should they? Ruzzia just clearly declared them as their enemy.
7
@AlreadyTakenTag Stalingrad for soviets was symbolic. However for Germans it was vital to get access to those oil fields since they had shortage on oil.
2
@LawrenceMacMacster USA was dominating both wars. They only withdrew due to political pressure. Vietnam would've ended up like South-Korea and afghanistan was never about occupation or annexation but rooting out terrorists.
2
@Ronnet USA had very minimal loses in both wars and actually won most engagements. Read some actual war history. "they'd never would've reach domination." Because they weren't there to dominate?
2
You don't understand. Ruzzianz have no individuality, they are all collectivists. For them Putin's ego is their ego. They are hiveminded people without capability to empathy.
1
Ruzzia being pushed from Bakhmut is massive. It hits the morale of their entire army in huge manner. They put so much resources and propaganda in trying to capture it. Losing it would be clear sign of them losing the war and Putin might lose his head.
1
@kryzzan7039 ruzkie bot detected
1
@gromswowguide7927 only recently
1
They were afraid of escalation. Thus they increased support slowly as response to human rights violations that Ruzzia had done
1
@no_rubbernecking This is not actually true. While democrats were talking about friendship with Ruzzia and Zhina. Trump had already considered them as rivals and enemy nations. Already forgot the trade wars with zhina? Just because he had some form of respect with Putler, it didn't mean that he considered ruzzia as ally.
1