Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Metatron" channel.

  1. Are you still defending the scam artist who lost everything after being revealed to be a conman?
    1
  2.  @warlockwod  Megacorporations had nothing to do with his channel being false flagged. Also megacorporations are left wing. Haven't you seen the political stuff they push out?
    1
  3.  @ptolemyauletesxii8642  Yeah sure, that's why megacorporations are putting rainbow flags, kicking non lefist out of their companies for voicing out of not being leftist. Suuuuuuuuuuuure.
    1
  4.  @POCKETChurch  Did you even watch the video? There was no evidence that said girl was her sister due to age of the body doesn't match with recorded age. Also Egyptian's weren't black. They are just like they are now. Mostly looking like arabic. Also to mention. Nobility didn't marry people outside of their class. So you are lying about priest. Since Pharaons were doing inbreeding. Also you have no evidence to back up your non-sense.
    1
  5.  @dhsf5937  You're spouting objectively speaking false here. Where do you get your information? Some obscure blogs? "they would sleep with non white women." Only slaves and they would never make their children known to public or even allow them to have any kind of power. You would know this if you had actually studied history at all. And where would this non-white woman appear from in the first place? "She could have white features and non white skin" not true albinonism doesn't affect on nose, and the blacks in USA can have white nose because racial mixing in the past. All the art from the time makes her look like white asf. Nowhere in the historic texts she is mentioned to look like black or even numibian. You're basically saying "she is black even though she had white skin and nose". So... how is she black again if she looks like typical white? XD How low can one's IQ be?
    1
  6.  @Farhan917  Ever seen white person who spend time on under sun? They get tan, which is brown. However You're confusing middle-eastern people into sub-saharian africans. Sorry but those people weren't in northern Africa, just like they aren't now either. Norther africa is different from southern one. Just like how nordics are different from meditarien. If you actually had been in this continent you would know this. But you're murican with murican education so you think that all africa looks like generic african american and all europe looks like swedish people.
    1
  7.  @kadarbraxton4717  Egyptians clearly do
    1
  8.  @kadarbraxton4717  teh heck you're spouting? Do you become black if you move to Africa? Do you become white and blond if you move to Sweden?
    1
  9.  @ronin6199  writings and the philosophy of the time. Low iq lefties like you have no clue about human history. You think ancient times were some progressive paradise? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  10.  @IHateHoldo  over year old thread give some context for your comment
    1
  11.  @IHateHoldo  so you were just agreeing with me. Okay
    1
  12. Fun fact... In global scale white people are actually minority.
    1
  13.  @KameradVonTurnip  Purges doesn't work as proof. Christians have purged other Christians. Communists have purged other communist. Purging is just getting rid of other political factions. You basically made no true scottman fallacy. Hitler was left winger. There is virtually no difference in rhetoric beside immigration.
    1
  14.  @ubuntuposix  Lol nothing you say makes any sense. Right wing stands for individuality and human freedom. Left wing for hive mind collectivism and oppression.
    1
  15.  @ubuntuposix  leftism isblite the past. The theorist such as marx based it on communam living of the past. Literally every time in human history where leftism has been tried. It ended up in tyranny and human suffering. Name even one time when it didn't
    1
  16. She was a mascot, nothing more.
    1
  17.  @RayB1656  She captured or her men captured. As I sad, she was just a mascot.
    1
  18.  @RayB1656  Jesters and mascots do in fact. Doing jousting for sake of entertainment of noblemen isn't really something so special. Winning actual jousting tournament would be something. Ownership of items doesn't make one miltiary genius nor even a good fighter. Too easy
    1
  19.  @RayB1656  just stating facts. Keep on coping and thinking that some peasant girl who never had protein in their diet, could magically developed genius mind and strong body. Not to mention mysteriously getting educated in arts of war and martial arts 🤣🤡
    1
  20.  @RayB1656  Traveling on horse back isn't same as having muscles and education. In order for brain to develop properly the protein is needed. Peasants can't afford it. Thus they usually ended up being bit like you. Aka having lQ same as my dog. Not to mention how sickly they were. it takes years of practice to become good with sword and even with warfare. She was way too young to have proper education or to even lift a sword. All what you said just reveals that you have never held a sword. Never fought any martial arts and never were in army. Too easy, she was just mascot to use to rise up morale of the troops. That's all she was.
    1
  21.  @RayB1656  you clearly have no clue how many years it takes to master anything and even more so to build up muscles. She was way too young unless she spend her entire childhood training... which she didn't
    1
  22.  @RayB1656  again it takes years if not decades to master ANYTHING. How is this difficult to understand? It's virtually impossible for peasant to be as good as her myth. It's nothing but false stories for morale boost
    1
  23.  @RayB1656  1. "Joan was born to a propertied peasant family at Domrémy in northeast France. In 1428, she requested to be taken to Charles VII, later testifying that she was guided by visions from the archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and Saint Catherine to help him save France from English domination. Convinced of her devotion and purity, Charles sent Joan, who was about seventeen years old, to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief army. " Straight from wikipedia. Scientifically speaking claiming to have visions from angels would deem one as schizophrenic. So We have already established that before age 17. Se was 100% peasant without any military or muscle training in the backround. We also have established by the sources that she was used to demoralize enemy. After all... she claimed she had visions from the angels themselves. Thus affecting morale of own troops and enemy troops. 2. Wikipedia literally states that she was from peasant family. Stop lying. 3. One still needs decades of training to become good and as established she was from peasant family. Thus no proper education, training nor meals. 4. Umm she was known as Saint because she claimed to see visions. 5. It takes years to learn how to ride and even more to do mounted combat. None of this would be possible for woman of her stature at the time. 6. They were if they were claimed to be saints that hear god. 7. They have when they are claimed to be saints. 8. This matters why? 9. They do if they are used as saints. 10. They do if they are saints. 11. Not until she was proclaimed as saint that gets visions from god. 12. I don't see how having bad temper qualifies one as warrior. If something it's the opposite since in military hierarchy and discipline is everything. 13. Actually they do. In fact canons and hand-canons were precisely taught to peasants because how easy it was to learn to use them. 14. They are if they claim to hear voice of god. 15. I don't see how that makes her a warrior. Spy at best. 16. She didn't have until she proclaimed to hear god. 17. She went only after being proclaimed as saint. 18. She didn't capture him by herself... Her men did. Too easy, her entire thing was that she was "messenger from god" if you don't believe in god then your story falls apart.
    1
  24.  @RayB1656  1. "Joan was born to a propertied peasant family at Domrémy in northeast France. In 1428, she requested to be taken to Charles VII, later testifying that she was guided by visions from the archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and Saint Catherine to help him save France from English domination. Convinced of her devotion and purity, Charles sent Joan, who was about seventeen years old, to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief army. " Straight from wikipedia. Scientifically speaking claiming to have visions from angels would deem one as schlz0-phrenlc. So We have already established that before age 17. Se was 100% peasant without any military or muscle training in the backround. We also have established by the sources that she was used to demoralize enemy. After all... she claimed she had visions from the angels themselves. Thus affecting morale of own troops and enemy troops. 2. Wikipedia literally states that she was from peasant family. Stop lying. 3. One still needs decades of training to become good and as established she was from peasant family. Thus no proper education, training nor meals. 4. Umm she was known as Saint because she claimed to see visions. 5. It takes years to learn how to ride and even more to do mounted combat. None of this would be possible for woman of her stature at the time. 6. They were if they were claimed to be saints that hear god. 7. They have when they are claimed to be saints. 8. This matters why? 9. They do if they are used as saints. 10. They do if they are saints. 11. Not until she was proclaimed as saint that gets visions from god. 12. I don't see how having bad temper qualifies one as warrior. If something it's the opposite since in military hierarchy and discipline is everything. 13. Actually they do. In fact canons and hand-canons were precisely taught to peasants because how easy it was to learn to use them. 14. They are if they claim to hear voice of god. 15. I don't see how that makes her a warrior. Spy at best. 16. She didn't have until she proclaimed to hear god. 17. She went only after being proclaimed as saint. 18. She didn't capture him by herself... Her men did. Too easy, her entire thing was that she was "messenger from god" if you don't believe in god then your story falls apart.
    1
  25. ​ @RayB1656  1. "Joan was born to a propertied peasant family at Domrémy in northeast France. In 1428, she requested to be taken to Charles VII, later testifying that she was guided by visions from the archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and Saint Catherine to help him save France from English domination. Convinced of her devotion and purity, Charles sent Joan, who was about seventeen years old, to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief army. " Straight from wikipedia. Scientifically speaking claiming to have visions from angels would deem one as schlz0-phrenlc. So We have already established that before age 17. Se was 100% peasant without any military or muscle training in the backround. We also have established by the sources that she was used to demoralize enemy. After all... she claimed she had visions from the angels themselves. Thus affecting morale of own troops and enemy troops. 2. Wikipedia literally states that she was from peasant family. Stop lying. 3. One still needs decades of training to become good and as established she was from peasant family. Thus no proper education, training nor meals. 4. Umm she was known as Saint because she claimed to see visions. 5. It takes years to learn how to ride and even more to do mounted combat. None of this would be possible for woman of her stature at the time. 6. They were if they were claimed to be saints that hear god. 7. They have when they are claimed to be saints. 8. This matters why? 9. They do if they are used as saints. 10. They do if they are saints. 11. Not until she was proclaimed as saint that gets visions from god. 12. I don't see how having bad temper qualifies one as warrior. If something it's the opposite since in military hierarchy and discipline is everything. 13. Actually they do. In fact canons and hand-canons were precisely taught to peasants because how easy it was to learn to use them. 14. They are if they claim to hear voice of god. 15. I don't see how that makes her a warrior. Spy at best. 16. She didn't have until she proclaimed to hear god. 17. She went only after being proclaimed as saint. 18. She didn't capture him by herself... Her men did.
    1
  26. ​ @RayB1656  You clearly never read her history. She was from peasant family. This is literally straight from wiki. All the other things you refered here was after she had proclaimed to get visions of god. Your argument would make sense if she owned all of those things before she was 17. Which isn't the case. She got all of those privileges because they thought she was messenger of god. I had longer rebuttal but for some reason youtube didn't like me posting it so this one was summed up version. You don't become super genius general who can fight against stronger people within 2-years.
    1
  27. Well he and those other people aren't really good researchers. All the information they provide are basic pop-knowledge this is why they generally spread a lot of misinformation.
    1
  28.  @LordVader1094  youtube's algorhytm for removing comments in secret treats it that way
    1
  29.  @gerodford711  yes but what is the reason to use least interesting character for that? There literally already were legendary ninja's at the time who could've easily be more interesting to play as.
    1
  30.  @danielmalinen6337  But that would make him a villain if he is part of the jesuits
    1
  31.  @gerodford711  The historic writings regarding to his existence. If you deny what I said then you have to deny his entire existence.
    1
  32.  @gerodford711  and i answered, the same source where you got his existence. Keep on coping 🤡
    1
  33.  @danielmalinen6337  no but from actual lore perspective oda would be with templars.
    1
  34. Wait... so monk was the first choice for heir until the new child came? So what is the issue? The the monk rule until Child is adult. Or are japanese monks allowed to have their own children?
    1
  35. Yeah entire wikipedia article was created this year. Before 2024 he didn't exists in wikipedia. Look at history of the article. He is basically fabricated.
    1
  36. Even Jordan Peterson?
    1
  37. reminder... No one cared when democrats did this
    1
  38. Because medieval people were malnutrition and lacked education. You don't produce intelligent people except among nobility, clergy and merchant class with such society. Which is precisely why all the thinkers were from one of these classes.
    1
  39. one year...But yes he never saw real combat. It's well known in japan that oda just viewed him as a pet. Heck he didn't even write a single letter about the guy. It was just to show everyone about the odity he had managed to find. Tall guy and black skin.
    1
  40.  @Intranetusa  So he shouldn't be given salary for doing work? Also weapon restriction came only later. It didn't apply during Oda's era.
    1
  41.  @Intranetusa  he was clearly just a slave and lived like one
    1
  42.  @Intranetusa  He was slave, then he was hired as pet. The sword was just ceremonial that is given to retainers. The laws regarding to weapon carriage at the time didn't exists. It was his job to carry Oda's weaposn so of course he has "permission". He was just glorified mule.
    1
  43.  @Intranetusa  It was made illegal by Hideyoshi not by Oda. KEep on being L. Salary is thing being paid for work, and sword was symbol of being retainer. Not status of samurai. Rofl keep on coping, oh and one fact more.. .Japanese kept records of samurai titles. There is no records of Yasuke having it.
    1
  44.  @Intranetusa  Oda wasn't shogun. He wasn't controlling entire Japan. Thus his own separate thing is irrelevant since he doesn't control the court. "You dont need to be a Samurai to be a warrior" Correct. "I said Yasuke was a retainer with privileges" That I agree on. "more than just a mere slave" You ignored the point that he was originally sIave and ended up being back to sIave. He didn't do anything noteworthy.
    1
  45.  @Intranetusa  He didn't he was effectively in war with entire japan and got killed before achieving title of shogun. He lost the war. How can you make national wide force of law when everyone is still fighting you? 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 "he became more than just" Yes, A pet to show of. He has no battle achievements under his belts. He was only shown off as oddity that amused Oda. " commoners didnt have. " Commoners had houses and salary. Those wealthy enough had even a sword. If he was ever had granted samurai title then he would've been forced to unalive himself after failing both of his masters. In fact it would be considered disgrace that he failed to do so and accepted exile instead. Simply put... He didn't have the title or did he had the spirit.
    1
  46. Running only works if you know you're faster than other and also have better stamina. Most law-abiding citizens are really slow runners. Running just makes you more vulnerable for attacks. You should either distract or slow him down and then run if possible. Or better if you know that knife attacks are common in your areq then wear protective gear against stabs and cuts
    1
  47. Pretty sure that garlic has been already sold out in all the stores.
    1
  48.  @vettir  That's funny since leftism is based on tribalistic system. Communism is literally about going back to small communal lifestyle. Keep on coping harder
    1
  49. Issue with Simon is that he is just a geek with low IQ and he thinks he is smart. All the knowledge he has are pure pop-knowledge.
    1
  50. He was basically court clown because Oda found his look amusing. He wasn't a warrior, and anyone with even half brain could figure out that someone without training can't beat up expert swordman. No matter how big or tall they are.
    1