Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Establishment vs Trump & Bernie Sanders (Pt. 4) | Milo Yiannopoulos | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.

***** I believe that people don't understand what arrogance is. When you're mediocre person and you're surrounded by total idiots. Then it's easy to appear arrogant around those idiots. Most people who people claim to be arrogant, are in reality telling some people that they don't think that highly of themselves. They simply view others near them as total idiots, and they have no issue admitting when someone is smarter than them.
3
It's fun to watch milo talking, but seriously he should let Rubin talk his point out.
1
+christian almli Doesn't same apply to you? People tend to think that they are better than they actually are.
1
christian almli Rofl what? And what scientific evidence you have to back this up?
1
***** "What Yiannopoulos has is called Dunning-Kruger effect. Illusory superiority. If he actually knew that he's just an average moron he probably wouldn't be so arrogant. Oh, who am I kidding, he'd still" Debunked. Dunning-kruger is bad science in action. Small sample size, and all were their students, hence can be bribed. Not only this but they asked after how did the test go. Instead before the test how well they think it will go. There is huge difference in asking before and after. There are plenty of geniuses and smart people who also think that they know a lot. It's nothing more than retarded fallacy that only those who think badly of themselves has to be talented.
1
Maximus Trolleus There is no such thing as business smart or science smart. People who are smart tend to do well in all categories. Don't confuse knowledge into intelligence. Knowledge is simply a tool for intelligence. Trump knows a lot about business where Nye knows a lot how to conduct science. Both of them can be intelligent men. They simply know different stuff.
1
Maximus Trolleus "i think there is a difference is between business smart and science smart." Again there isn't. It's simply matter of knowledge gathered, not matter of intelligence. "there is a reason why most ppl tend to be really smart in one thing but dumb in something else. " Again you're confusing knowledge to intelligence. "this is like biology 101 that there are multiple types of intelligences." Nope, general intelligence have been proven. Other traits simply help in other stuff. Talented/intelligent people simply prefer to focus one thing instead of many, hence their skills and knowledge are greater in that one area. However they are still as smart in any other field. If they bother to put the effort they will be talented in those other fields too. " like there are ppl that have never played a single instrument and yet are able to pull out of a pretty decent song with very little practice." And same people are capable of doing well in other fields too. "do you expect einstein do pull off a beethoven level music or do you expect beethoven to invent a new scientific theory?" In matter of fact yes. Also question should be otherway around. Beethoven's music is great art but it isn't greater than einstein's work. Beethoven was simply genius that was forced since his childhood to create music. They only taught music to him, nothing else. Einstein without any doubt would've created good music in same circumstances. In matter of fact he had said that if he wasn't Physicists he would've been musician. And he knew how to play instruments. "violin began to sing, the walls of the room seemed to recede—for the first time, Mozart in all his purity appeared before me, bathed in Hellenic beauty with its pure lines, roguishly playful, mightily sublime.” -. A high school friend report to biographer Carl Seeling that at this time, when the young Einstein played music.
1
Jordan H What the fuck are you talking about? You do realize you just said what I have been saying here all the time?
1
Maximus Trolleus "but with aspergers then that means that his people smarts arent very good then." It's mental illness. You can't say that he isn't smart in it, if his dysfunction is caused by illness. " I have also been diagnosed with aspergers and just like with many aspergers, mine manifested with me being really smart with math and science and all that other stuff like being analytical, critical thinker, recognizing patterns, problem solving, etc." No it doesn't. Asperger can be as dumb as bird, without any special skills. You being interested in math and science is simply due you not being able to interact with human beings hence try to find other interests in this world. Math and science are common interests for anyone who isn't much into human interactions. That and arts. " but not so smart with social interactions. " Again, you lacking knowledge of social interaction has nothing to do with intelligence. "I said that I consider myself smart when it comes to math and science but I dont consider myself smart with social interactions. So there is no contradiction, I just think that you read it wrong. " There was contradiction. You wrote it wrong.
1
Hisoka X Huntah "Deductive reasoning, spatial intelligence and puzzle solving is what’s in an IQ test. Have you ever taken one? If not, google it and get back to me on that, dumbass." You clearly missed my point. All of those demand thinking. It's about puzzle solving. But the fact that you were literally too fucking stupid to get my point is just hilarious. I never claimed that it isn't puzzle solving. You do realize that deductive reasoning, spatial intelligence and puzzle solving has always been seen as intelligence? "Because when you say “thinking” it is literally what human beings do." Either you lied your intelligence or you actually are autistic. If you decide to linger on that "thinking" word I mentioned. Because then you literally lost my point due fucking semantics. "You don’t specify any definition of what thinking can entail;" Because I assumed that I'm talking with people who aren't autistic or total retards. "No, but your ridiculous long responses gives me reason to believe you have some spectrum of autism." Oh the irony... " Everything is pure knowledge. The ability to do math is where your thinking comes in. You are just arguing semantics. " Now you just went full retarded. With your reasoning someone with IQ of 70 can do same things as fast and as well as someone with 150. That is like you would say that everything is in computer's function is hard drive. "Defensive lol I am explaining to you why you are wrong. " Yeah right. "WHERE was this debunked? It was never debunked, it’s a theory you nitwit. " It has never been proven. Again read the fucking study. Instead of random articles online. "You are contradicting yourself as IQ is highly logic based, which is something I excell at." Clearly you don't excel in it. And why I'm contradicting myself? I never believed your words about your IQ in the first place. Only a fucking total idiot thinks that someone would take everything said on internet as truth. If something your IQ claim actually proves your wrong by that reasoning. " Prove to me the theory is debunked." You first. Burden of proof. You claimed that there is studies proving this. Now provide the study. And then I proceed to tell where the flaws are. Bring the best evidence you have to the table, because I'm not going to bother to check multiple different ones. If I'm wrong, then just one should be enough. "Multiple intelligences can be observed" Something being able to observe doesn't make it any less pseudoscience. pseudoscience is study which is made to look scientific even though it's full of flaws and logical fallacies. For example study with only one sample size is obviously pseudoscience. Definition I provided was literally from dictionary. "evidence is ALL AROUND US of people who are good at different things and think and learn in different ways." How is this claim any different from religious person saying that "evidence for god is all around us"? "Holy fucking Christ. Comparing it to a pseudoscience like astrology is like comparing the theory of evolution to religious dogma." again pseudoscience has nothing to do with superstition. It has everything to do with bad methods to conduct science. "That’s why scientists to this day study the theory of multiple intelligences, gotcha. I forgot you were Bill Nye the scient guy." Argument from authority, also lack of evidence to back up the claim. You're most definitely not a smart man. "Oh my jesus christ. The ability to comprehend something is intelligence. How thick headed can you be? Some brains are more able to comprehend a musical piece and even craft entire sonatas while others are kinesthetically intelligent and learn as they go." What makes you think that? Let's make this easy. Provide me musician that is considered genius by idiots like you, but has IQ lower than 100. Or better. Provide mathematician who's IQ is lower than 100 and is still considered genius. Intelligent people are good at comprehending everything they decided to put their attention into. The reason why not everyone of them isn't musicians and scientists same time is simply explained by the fact that they have different interests and we have limited amount of time we can use. "Why would I change the definition of anything? Intelligence is a broad topic" Because you think you can win this by making it into game of semantics. Intelligence is not broad topic. It's made into broad topic by low IQ and PC people. Intelligence is sensitive subject hence it's made into broad topic due that fact so that everyone can feel like special snowflakes. "don't worry if you can't count 1+1, you're still intelligent in your own way..." IS what your mom told you. "Your argument again is based on the stereotypical definition of intelligence. " It's dictionary definition. Not some PC defination where everyone is intelligent. "If you actually knew what you were talking about, you would understand that intelligence is expressed in a variety of ways. " This comment can be regarged in same value as creationists saying "If you actually knew what you were talking about, you would believe that earth was created in 6000 years ago" "You expecting the billions of people on this planet to only learn one way proves that you don;t know a damned thing." Strawman is a strawman. " The fact you believe everyone learns and expressed learning and thinking the same way shows how absolutely retarded your argument is. " The fact that you need to strawman me shows how absolutely retarded you are.
1
Jordan H "Tell me again how your grammar is perfect and mine is flawed. " I never said my grammar is perfect. I pointed out that you have no right to complain about grammar when you don't know difference between your and you're.
1
Maximus Trolleus "you sound like an IQ elitist. as having a high IQ" Ah here we go. So this is what it has come to. After you failed to counter any of my arguments you decided to rely on ad hominems and insults. Shame that you're not mature enough to admit when you are wrong.
1
Maximus Trolleus Elitists is insult and you have insulted here far before it. However that's not the problem. Problem is that you decided to ignore everything I wrote and resort on personal attack instead. "and with the debate we have to agree to disagree. ive read peer reviewed articles about multiple intelligences and you said they were false." No you haven't as I just did prove. You simply did do fast google search on subject and just planted them here. you clearly never read them. And I provided links from actual psychologists pointing out why it's bad science. "like i said, the one thing i know is that intelligence is still being debated about in the scientific community." So is creationism and flat earth by some. That doesn't make it true. It simply means that some people believe it regardless of the evidence. Rest of your comment is total non-sense which has nothing to do with the topic. It's just you wanting to make wall of text out of irrelevant monologue. Only thing that can debunk general intelligence is the fact that someone with Low IQ does something that we consider that geniuses achieve.
1
Maximus Trolleus "i think your not understanding my argument. im not saying low iq ppl are smart. " Again you keep saying that, but that would mean that you don't understand multiple intelligence theory. Theory literally says that IQ tests is meaningless and doesn't prove anything. "im simply saying that ppl can be smart in different ways." Only way you can prove this sort of claim is to provide evidence of a guy with LOW IQ score and then show how he is smart in different way. ". i have high intelligence when it comes to math and science as determined by my IQ test, but I have poor musical intelligence. How do you explain that?" I have already done that multiple times but you keep ignoring it. " So if someone has a well developed creative part of their brain and lesser developed logic part and someone else is the opposite" Creativity is not same as intelligence. People who take drugs are more creative during drug abuses. Even though studies imply that their IQ is lower during those trips. Creativity is something else than intelligence. However intelligent mind with creativity can create something else than abstract art. " thats the point im trying to make with the emotional intelligence thing I typed in the previous argument." Again emotional intelligence is non-sense. It literally has nothing to do with intelligence. It has everything to do with how much you know about social norms. This is tied on how well you were taught and how often you have social contacts. " Like how do you even define intelligence" Like we have defined it for fucking centuries. You're trying to redefine intelligence into something else so it fits better to your delusional world view. This is a slap into face to every genius in history of mankind who have been called as intelligent.
1
Floki holy shit does he really think that french revolution was in middle-ages? HAHA what a joke.
1
Maximus Trolleus Again I don't believe that you have high IQ. Facebook tests doesn't count. Also you say that logic isn't your strongest suit. Even though intelligence tests generally demand logical thinking. So your claim by itself is contradiction. "here is an emotional part of the brain and people with higher "emotional intelligence" tend to have that part of their brain overdeveloped." Now you're talking about empathy. Empathy has nothing to do with intelligence. When you have high empathy it's easier to relate to other people's position. Again nothing to do with intelligence. "If not intelligence then it is clearly something that they were born with that makes them better then average people." just like being born with legs makes legged people better than those who did born without leg. "And with emotions you are actually wrong. TONS AND TONS of research on different cultures and newborns show that the basic emotions are innate and not learned and they are universal. " No they are not. People who their emotions in different way in different cultures. It's just in current era where other cultures learn habits of westerners. Newborns copy emotional cues they see in people's around them. "Even among hunter/gatherer tribes, the basic emotions hold true. T" Ah you're again twisting language and point in here to serve your agenda. Now you're trying to make argument over that all cultures have emotions. Even though argument was that they show their emotions in different ways. "Out of curiosity what is your IQ? And do you have any science background because it just seems like you have never taken any biology or psychology course before." Not going to tell anything since it has no actually purpose. This is simply your attempt to try to use ad hominem attack. You cannot dismiss someone's arguments hence you try to dismiss their credibility. That by itself proves that you don't understand science nor how to conduct debate.
1