Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Jordan B Peterson" channel.

HMS Blackprice Nope, capitalist would gladly make a shirt and sell it to you. "If poor get richer please explain The United States. " Statistically poverty has been in decline. Also nothing bad in income inequality.
8
HMS Blackprice Nope it's a statistical fact that poverty was decreasing. You really think that economists doesn't take into account inflation which you don't even understand as a concept? Or purchasing power? Please... Poor today have cars, computers and cellphones. You can't even compare poor in USA to poor in socialist countries who don't have any of that. For you poverty is that someone can't go daily to starbucks and drink expensive coffee.
6
For your stance against atheism. Psychopathic interest is irrational. Look... When you are about to cause harm to others for your own self gain, you are making unnecessarily risks that can fuck up your life completely. Each crime you commit, has a chance of thinks getting wrong. Not only that, but you lose in friendships. Hard to build up decent friendship when no one can trust you. Humans are still social animals and loneliness is not healthy, not that most people even want to be alone. There is a reason why humans are group animals and why societies where people help each others are strong. Because strength in numbers. Also you're basically claiming that nothing stops atheist from start killing people. On what grounds? There is this thing as called as empathy, and most people don't wish to rape, murder and steal. So in other words, there are more to gain when you're not acting like asshole or psychotic killer. Just look at history of mankind, people commit crimes regardless do they believe in god or not.
5
Well Fry has more experience on that regard. Though I wish Hitchen would've been there. He would've crushed them. Sad that we don't have anymore many famous people who are capable to debate.
4
@sandoristar7597 Norway isn't socialist
2
@DonDeering There is no such thing as surplus value, and your system is literally ensuring that no one has any reason to invest in creation of new business.
2
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 Ah you're that type of person who can't control their emotions thus just spam messages instead of making one coherent and well build response. "It shouldn't, lol, whether it's 30% Capitalist, 70% Socialist or 10% Socialist and 90% Capitalist, it's still a mixed economy. " Which makes word mixed economy mean nothing since it means everything same time. In regards of "mixed economy" the nordic countries are more right wing than USA. More capitalist than USA. "Workplace Democracy is a socialist policy." Not really as long as it's private company it's capitalism. And unlike you I actually live in nordic country. We do not have workplace democracy. Rofl... What a joke. Using wikipedia as his source and doesn't even bother to remove the source numbers away from his copy paste response.
2
@emperorstevee Actually if they acted like business they would provide more online lectures with cheaper price and with wider access. It's precisely because it's not ran like business that you have problems with education.
1
@havenbastion On what basis it's not legitimately earned? "Nobody works a billion times smarter or harder than anyone else " Expect they do. Some people are limited on their natural talent and aptitudes. With your reasoning rock stars shouldn't earn more than random street artists. "nobody deserves a billion times more power than anybody else" On what basis?
1
@PierreVeniot Too many, all flat out psychopaths.
1
@sandoristar7597 It's not even mixed economy. This is fallacy made by left wing not understanding that nordic countries are mainly free market capitalist nations. Many of them have less corporate tax rates than in USA and even less regulations.
1
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 The word mixed holds certain image of economy being 50% of both. The word mixed means nothing since with your reasoning literally all societies on the planet are mixed economies, including USA. Thus rendering word mixed economy into meaningless word salad. "The threshold of a company's size where co-determination must apply varies between countrie" Are the companies private or public? "Codetermination" Literally nothing to do with anything I had said.
1
@Grom76300 Under socialism no medical bills but no medical treatment either.
1
@Grom76300 I challenge you to actually look up definition of communism and socialism before spouting such non-sense.
1
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 Wikipedia is not reliable source, literally anyone can edit it. "Only to Peterson fans would Wikipedia's listing of many sources seem like a bad thing." You clearly lack brain activity to get my point. I didn't say that listing sources is bad thing. You see wikipedia articles has this number which is reference to wikipedia's sources. You copy pasting whole thing including the number itself makes your post look terrible. Even worse... You didn't even admit at the time that your source was wikipedia. Basically you copied and pasted some text and thought it makes you look smart and as if it comes out of your mouth. "And the only inaccuracy that plagues that page is the fact that Denmark has raised the amount of workers required for representation to 35, and it has very little effect for those workers anyway, it only really takes effect at up to 150+ workers under one person/company's employ." Citation needed that every company needs 35 worker presentation in denmark. Also 35 representing doesn't mean that they have ownership or control over the company. Thus still capitalist company. "It's no longer PURE Capitalist, workers get a say in how that business operates, as opposed to one person/small group of people only having their say." Name a single country in history of this planet that was "pure" capitalist. And no workers don't get to say how business operates. Right for it is still on the owner. Represents can just voice out their opinions. "There's a fairly good reason why most, if not ALL developed nations are mixed economies, don't just dismiss this because you don't understand, tickle that urge for knowledge once." Name a single nation on this planet which doesn't have mixed economy on given definition you gave before. "In another thread, guy cries about my typing "walls of text", YOU cry when I do not." There is this thing called as segments, learn to use them.
1
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 Ah more spam and this time it took you hour in between to post second comment. "Literally anyone can fix bullshit edits, too. " Having publicity of whole country noticing is different from someone using common misconception of a word. As I had already explained with your reasoning literally every society in history of this planet is mixed economy, thus rendering the term useless. "Employee representation at board level starts in companies with 35 employees and these representatives have one third of the seats." Math might be hard for you to comprehend. 1/3 isn't enough for total control or ownership. So chapter 8? Hahaha seems like you don't even know the high terms used in here, this only applies to public and limited liability companies. Limited liability company is whereby the owners are not personally liable for company's debts or liabilities. And as stated before representatives do not have majority of decision power thus does not fall under their control. Personally I find it silly to have representatives from the people who do not even understand management and other high level stuff needed for running a business. That is practically same as demanding that in every school 1/3 out of every teacher should be a creationist. Always easy to defeat far leftist.
1
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 "Simply because you say so, right." Name a single society which wasn't. "Uhm, why do they need majority of "decision power", exactly? Good non existent god, it's like arguing with a brick wall. " Socialism is about workers owning and controlling the means of productions and the distribution of goods. Not about voicing out their issues in company's meetings. "Not all Socialists want "Total" worker control/ownership." It's literally defined as that.
1
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 "t the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned OR regulated by the community as a whole." If you use regulation as definition of socialism then literally every society in history of this planet is socialist. There is no society where there are no regulations. You didn't state your source so here is my google results: 1.any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods" 2. a system of society or group living in which there is no private propert b a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state. -Merriam webster "Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy." - American Heritage dictionary of English Language 5th edition "a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the community as a whole, usually through a centralized government." -Dictionary "Socialism, social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources. " -Britannica With fast search I weren't able to find the results you had. Literally nothing had said before anything about regulation.
1
@definitelynotcrazyrei3890 I just gave you multiple definitions from different sources. Also you lie. I'm know on site called as Oxford learner's dictionaries. Socialism: a set of political and economic theories based on the belief that everyone has an equal right to share of country's wealth and that the government should own and control the main industries. "Yes. Every single society on earth has workers regulating their workplace." Name a single country where government doesn't regulate workplace. You literally lied just moment ago.
1
Peterson like all the Americans (the continent) right wingers just went batshit crazy and started simp for Putin. They literally have no clue over history of Russia and how it treats other countries. Current war is basically repetition of what happened in Georgia.
1
@flameguy3416 libertarians aren't anarchists.
1
You should make higher court case while showing examples of left wing hate speech from people in same field and haven't lost their licenses for it.
1
@henrythegreatamerican8136 " humans have the potential to do things without proper boundaries." So you admit that government can do things without proper boundaries?
1
Interesting, I didn't know who Dyson was, but the moment he started to talk I was thinking "that guy sounds like an evangelist priest". Pretty fun to notice that he actually was that. He did rely too much on sophistry, and unfortunately for fry and you. Neither of you did point that out early on. Should have focused on point and say "yeah, black people have suffered in the past, what that has to do with government making laws which speech is allowed and which not?". Or bring examples of how jews suffered in the past or how chinese were used as slaves as well. In fact there was nothing unique in slavery of black people.
1
Reported for spreading misinformation. This is disgusting how you keep defending genocide.
1