Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. nazies literally were outnumbered by allied forces. In both population and army size.
    9
  2. So why then make several drafts if they only lost 60? XD Keep on coping harder
    6
  3.  @johnnyg3166  Literally reported even in Russian media that they had drafts XD Also reported of going door to door and forcelly drafting kids.
    6
  4. There is nothing ruzzia can do to salvage situation anymore than full on retreat and cutting head of Putler. Even if ruzzia would somehow win the war. What they would gain? All the cities they took over are nothing but ruinz and population mass murdered and lucky ones escaped to Poland. It would be pyrrhic victory at cost of entire ruzzian empire. Not just that but Okranians would keep on fighting guerilla warfare thus making holding troops in Okraine costly.
    5
  5. So far they have been pushing back bigger nation. Population size doesn't matter if you can't arm them. Also using nuclear weapons would mean extinction event to all ruzkiez around the globe. It would turn whole world against ruzzia and probably even nuke all of their cities. Not just that but nukes? Rofl... Okraine is too close to ruzzia. Nuclear fallout would harm ruzzia and tactical nukes are outdated in modern warfare where people don't really make massive blobs of troops.
    2
  6.  @michelcharron4633  Man what a low IQ take. Ruzzia made surprise invasion. That's only reason why they occupied so much territory at start. Now they are being pushed back and they have suffered major loses .They literally lost more men and equipment within first week than USA at afg for 20-years. Millions of Ruzzianz have fled their own coutnry as well and their economy has suffered greatly. Ruzzia is running short on their war treasury that they had been building up for 30-years. After that the reality will hit hard on ruzkie trolls. " west is now rounding up anything it can cobble together," This is not true. West has been sending extra stockpiles of oudated weapons. They haven't sended their best weapons due to fear of escalation. Plus most equipment Okrainians have got is from surrendered ruzkiez. At this point there is literally nothing Ruzzia can do to win. Let's look at things objectively: Their excuse for invasion is "nato" "expanding". Well the moment they invaded NATO gained two far more powerful and strategically important allies. Thus on their very first prime objective and excuse they already failed. Instead of giving "one" they gave 2 and probably 3 after the war. What is there to gain anymore? Cities that have been leveled down? Population that has either escaped, mass murdered or simply acts as guerillas in occupied territory? This would be pyrrhic victory at best that wouldn't pay the cost of the war and would still result in collapse of ruzkie empire. Ruzzia can end the war anytime they want. Just retreat fully and pay back your warcrimes.
    2
  7.  @michelcharron4633  lol bot found,you just repeated same nonsense i refuted
    2
  8.  @michelcharron4633  you posting copy pasted nonsense without actually responding my counter argument proves that you're paid ruzzkie troll and should be exiled from this planet.
    2
  9. Ruzkiez have never been smart when it comes to warfare. Even in WW2 they relied on allied intel and strategy. while ruzkiez greatest strategy was "just send men in until they run out of bullets"
    2
  10. Nah they should give them nukes and give permission to launch them at moscow if ruzzia doesn't retreat.
    2
  11. Their goal right now is war off attrition. Which means destroying Okraine's ability to keep their warmachine running so that they only rely on west's support for warfare. Basically ruzzia is betting on west getting tired of situation and stops supporting. That and the secondary goal of ethnic cleansing. Ruzzia is there to kill everyone who is not ethnic ruzzian.
    2
  12.  @Henry_the_Eighth_  You're spouting ruzzian propaganda on this comment section and praising them as saviors of the universe. Of course you're ruzzian troll. Not just that but dismiss anything everyone says as long as it's not said by RT. "embarrassing yourself " The fact that you think that people care about "embarrassing yourself " on internet while having anonymous accounts just speaks out loudly about how low your IQ is.
    2
  13. If you don't show hostility toward ruzzia then you're not a human
    2
  14.  @KnownNiche1999  just speaking facts
    2
  15.  @mittensandcoconut  German was in war with multiple different countries same time. Soviets outnumbered Finland 100x
    1
  16.  @mittensandcoconut  They had to invade USSR because they lacked oil due to blockade that Britain had done to them. This means that in order to run their warmachines, they needed those oil fields from USSR. This is objective fact. You clearly haven't studied the war. It's relevant since OP said that it's not population that wins war. The Finland KD score for Finland was basically 10K and 1D Look it up. If population wouldn't win wars then Finland would've easily won. Too easy
    1
  17. @mittensandcoconut  they had to. They had no oil or gas sources at the time. You can't have infrastructure and army moving without it. This again is well recorded fact. Soviets had planned invading Germany eventually also a fact that had documents backing it up.
    1
  18.  @mittensandcoconut  Those camps were practically labor camps of free workforce. You act as if those camps spend more oil and gas than entire military machine. Again it's objective fact that their objective was to get those oil fields to ensure dependency. This is precisely why H ignored the wartargets that generals suggested and went for the gas/oil instead. Regarding to Trade with SoV, again it was well documented that it was bound to break eventually by either side.
    1
  19.  @julienckjm7430  fighting against all nato? Then explain why NATO haven't mobilized their armies to Russia? XD
    1
  20.  @julienckjm7430  All they did was to sell their oudated stockpiles. Hardly the same as if entire nato would take part. Or are you saying that China is part of the war?
    1
  21. @stalker2.007  russia literally started the war. Same with Afghanistan
    1
  22. @stalker2.007  it's not. War had nothing to do with nato and it took several months before nato did start to sell stockpiles to ukraine
    1
  23.  @stalker2.007  If it was proxy of NATO and Russia. Then Ukraine would've had all latest nato tech and equipment at start. They didn't have any of that. There is literally nothing for NATO to gain from that region.
    1
  24.  @julienckjm7430  NATO is just excuse used by Russia. One out of many. Such as "G3nocide" or "it belongs to Russia". One should never trust Russian. They always lie and cheat and murder whenever given a chance.
    1
  25.  @stalker2.007  There is nothing for NATO to gain to be there, and if they were part of it, they would've send latest tech instead of waiting over year to do so.
    1
  26.  @julienckjm7430  prove that it has to do with nato
    1
  27. @julienckjm7430  and that is problem why?
    1
  28. @julienckjm7430  what? Your comment makes 0 sense. How does any of this justify russia annexing anothrr country?
    1
  29. @julienckjm7430  what justified? Why would russia get angry that countries join defense allience if their goal isn't to expand?
    1
  30. @julienckjm7430  name article in nato rules that demand to join offensive war. This was too easy
    1
  31.  @julienckjm7430  Huge wall of text nothing but copy paste. I asked you to name article from the rules. Instead you go on and tell about stories of USA. Simply put.. You couldn't find a single rule which would force all members to join offensive war. This was too easy
    1
  32.  @julienckjm7430  Huge wall of text nothing but copy paste. I asked you to name article from the rules. Instead you go on and tell about stories of America. Simply put.. You couldn't find a single rule which would force all members to join offensive war. This was too easy
    1
  33.  @julienckjm7430  I asked you to name article from the rules. Instead you go on and tell about whataboutism about certain country. Simply put.. You couldn't find a single rule which would force all members to join offensive war. This was too easy
    1
  34.  @julienckjm7430  You're switching the topic. You said that NATO is a threat but failed to provide actual ruling in NATO that would force members to participate on offensive war. Your stories about USA has no relation to this. Also it's weird that you even consider it as a threat when you have nuclear weapons as security guarantee.
    1
  35.  @maggoli67  ruzkiez have been losing ground against smaller nation with outdated equipment. They failed to take over the country in time limit they claimed.
    1
  36.  @kramer8487  ruzzia would conduct massive genocide there like they did in Georgia. Ruzkie are pure evil.
    1
  37.  @ikmal017  ruzzia claimed to take okraine in 3 days. Now its almost an year. Also usa did defeat afgan government. There were just left overs of terrorist groups selling drugs to pay their small engagements. Of you look at stats usa lost less in 20-years than ruzzia within first week. For Vietnam goal waa never to occupy but to defend South just like with korea. It ended up in usa's victory but north Vietnam broke peace treaty and invaded south after usa pulled troops back
    1
  38.  @matthiuskoenig3378  Ruzzia broke minsk agreement and Budapest agreement
    1
  39.  @Roboutdoors17  First 3 months West did nothing. After that West started to help since they notice that Okraine has a fighting chance and spirit to fight for right to exists.
    1
  40.  @anarchyorslavery1616  Rofl, thus proving that westerners have better in handling economy.
    1
  41.  @Roboutdoors17  West only started training Okranian soldiers 2014 when ruzzia started invasion. Also this isn't same as helping them with weapons and funds. They had send 0 millitary help itself to the country before the 3 months had passed. Okranians managed to defeat ruzzian horde on their own. West just helps them to manage the long term war of attrition.
    1
  42.  @anarchyorslavery1616  So you're saying that jews are superior to the ruzzianz?
    1
  43.  @michelcharron4633  Saw you copy pasting talking points I had previously refuted and you refused to actually address any of my points. Ruzkiez are pure evil and that is a fact. World will be better place after your evil empire falls. "concluded that you don't know or understand much so therefore it would be pointless " I conclude from this that you're incapable to refute my points. " I might be interested from the point of view of ripping" Rofl delusion at max that some random ruzkiez drunkard could ever do that. Especially when all of his information comes from state media. Ruzkiez are enemy of humanity and all life on earth. You will get what you deserve like nazies had ;)
    1
  44.  @anarchyorslavery1616  well clearly superior to you and your evil empire of gobniz. Since they have outplayed you into war where even winning means losing 🤣
    1
  45.  @Wordbird69  That makes no logical sense. So then you agree that west should never trade with ruzzia ever again?
    1
  46.  @hombreg1  Rofl Yuan is literally ponzi scheme. Arabs are going bankruptcy if they go to that scam.
    1
  47.  @Henry_the_Eighth_  Even if that would be the case, I don't see that beneficial to ruzkiez. Especially since they see west as their eternal enemy and they just lost generation while west lost virtually nothing.
    1
  48.  @impersonal6650  You totally forgot that in their retreat they did send mobilized civilians to stand there to slow down. So literally meat grinder. Plus what I have seen from their equipment. People aren't even given rations since ruzzian commanders think they will die anyway within day or two.,
    1
  49.  @sarankumar7236  Iraq was sanctioned by UN and Talibans had declared war on US. How are any of these comparable to peaceful Okranians wanting to trade with west? "US did not make Ukraine provoke " Correct they didn't provoke and how would trading with west provoke evil ruzkiez?
    1
  50.  @sullathehutt7720  "Since we respect the UN so much, right? " IF UN sanctions then it's considered as global consensus on action. Also Iraq wasn't some sweet little angel. "The Taliban did not do" They did. They literally took full credit on it and posted it online. You would need to have IQ less than 30 for think that they would took credit for attack they had not done.
    1