Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Will Ukraine run out of troops before Russia?" video.

nazies literally were outnumbered by allied forces. In both population and army size.
9
So why then make several drafts if they only lost 60? XD Keep on coping harder
6
@johnnyg3166 Literally reported even in Russian media that they had drafts XD Also reported of going door to door and forcelly drafting kids.
6
@mittensandcoconut German was in war with multiple different countries same time. Soviets outnumbered Finland 100x
1
@mittensandcoconut They had to invade USSR because they lacked oil due to blockade that Britain had done to them. This means that in order to run their warmachines, they needed those oil fields from USSR. This is objective fact. You clearly haven't studied the war. It's relevant since OP said that it's not population that wins war. The Finland KD score for Finland was basically 10K and 1D Look it up. If population wouldn't win wars then Finland would've easily won. Too easy
1
@mittensandcoconut they had to. They had no oil or gas sources at the time. You can't have infrastructure and army moving without it. This again is well recorded fact. Soviets had planned invading Germany eventually also a fact that had documents backing it up.
1
@mittensandcoconut Those camps were practically labor camps of free workforce. You act as if those camps spend more oil and gas than entire military machine. Again it's objective fact that their objective was to get those oil fields to ensure dependency. This is precisely why H ignored the wartargets that generals suggested and went for the gas/oil instead. Regarding to Trade with SoV, again it was well documented that it was bound to break eventually by either side.
1
@julienckjm7430 fighting against all nato? Then explain why NATO haven't mobilized their armies to Russia? XD
1
@julienckjm7430 All they did was to sell their oudated stockpiles. Hardly the same as if entire nato would take part. Or are you saying that China is part of the war?
1
@stalker2.007 russia literally started the war. Same with Afghanistan
1
@stalker2.007 it's not. War had nothing to do with nato and it took several months before nato did start to sell stockpiles to ukraine
1
@stalker2.007 If it was proxy of NATO and Russia. Then Ukraine would've had all latest nato tech and equipment at start. They didn't have any of that. There is literally nothing for NATO to gain from that region.
1
@julienckjm7430 NATO is just excuse used by Russia. One out of many. Such as "G3nocide" or "it belongs to Russia". One should never trust Russian. They always lie and cheat and murder whenever given a chance.
1
@stalker2.007 There is nothing for NATO to gain to be there, and if they were part of it, they would've send latest tech instead of waiting over year to do so.
1
@julienckjm7430 prove that it has to do with nato
1
@julienckjm7430 and that is problem why?
1
@julienckjm7430 what? Your comment makes 0 sense. How does any of this justify russia annexing anothrr country?
1
@julienckjm7430 what justified? Why would russia get angry that countries join defense allience if their goal isn't to expand?
1
@julienckjm7430 name article in nato rules that demand to join offensive war. This was too easy
1
@julienckjm7430 Huge wall of text nothing but copy paste. I asked you to name article from the rules. Instead you go on and tell about stories of USA. Simply put.. You couldn't find a single rule which would force all members to join offensive war. This was too easy
1
@julienckjm7430 Huge wall of text nothing but copy paste. I asked you to name article from the rules. Instead you go on and tell about stories of America. Simply put.. You couldn't find a single rule which would force all members to join offensive war. This was too easy
1
@julienckjm7430 I asked you to name article from the rules. Instead you go on and tell about whataboutism about certain country. Simply put.. You couldn't find a single rule which would force all members to join offensive war. This was too easy
1
@julienckjm7430 You're switching the topic. You said that NATO is a threat but failed to provide actual ruling in NATO that would force members to participate on offensive war. Your stories about USA has no relation to this. Also it's weird that you even consider it as a threat when you have nuclear weapons as security guarantee.
1
@dudeonyoutube Seethe? Lol why would I? Russia made deadly mistake and lost big time in manner that they can never recover.
1
@dudeonyoutube I'm a guy, though russian men can't really be called as men. Too cowardly to be one
1
@dudeonyoutube lol there are no men in russia
1