Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "CBN News" channel.

@Johnconner1298 Ruzkiez already had 100 nukes pointing them at Finland around 70-years. Now we have our own nukes to point at ruzkiez in return.
11
@rizdevo2512 There is literally video footage of hamas tunnels in hospitals and troops shooting from the hospital. Hardly "unarmed"
4
@Thor.Jorgensen They didn't lose war. IF goal of the war for ruzzia was total annexation, and Finland kept their independence and merely lost some usless plot of land that has no economic value. Then it was a win for Finnish people.
3
@ivana_7010 Name NATO war that NATO used to attack. NON-NATO country and annexed said region.
2
@ДанилаМилицын-ж8г Ilma Tar refuted you soundly. Also to point out Finlan did not take part of Stalingrad. Finland stayed within their previous borders. This is well established fact. Also it was Ruzzia who asked for peace. Ruzzia's goal was to total domination of Finland, but they noticed they can't do it if they want to get eastern-europe and baltics. So they made peace treaty with Finland and asked Finland to give a way some landmass that has no economic value. Also the fact that you admit Ribbentrop pact existed it proves that you admit that Ruzkiez's goal was to annex Finland as whole, but they failed doing so. Stalin didn't have "more improtant tasks". Stalin just knew that he would have to commit everything to get Finland, and that would mean he wouldn't get eastern, europe not baltics. Fins entire war strategy relied on this and it paid off. Ruzkiez were played and humiliated.
2
@madvestjan3718 Everyone in Finland say that they won. This is because Finland achieved it's war goals while Ruzzia didn't gain anything that they originally wanted.
2
@Aaron-br4pi Ruzzia did concentrate all of it's troops to the capital in the first week of the war. And they lost big time. Even without any nato weapons. Ruzkeiz are pure clowns.
2
@LordPrutsikas What a low IQ ruzkie claim. I'm from Finland and I know for a fact that we wanted to join NATO. And Finland has always hated Ruzzia for all the atrocities they had done to us. If you wanted Finland to be Neutral, you would've given us back our ancestral lands and give nukes for self-protection.
1
@aliwalil4160 preemptive? What they would gain from it?
1
@claytonhawk8512 NATO was formed to defend. Ruzkie and Khina are both seeking to expand
1
@dthrust9037 Rofl what a clown comment. Then tell me... Why isn't Polland moving to Ruzkiez heartland? Why isn't USA nuking pathetic ruzzian cities? NATO isn't fighting ruzzia right now.
1
@fitzroy6970 So how does it justify ruzzia to bully other nations next to it? Ruzzian's think they own the world even though they own nothing but vodka bottle. "Finland knew that joining nato" Finland was always in odds with ruzkiez because ruzzianz have always dreamed invading Finland.
1
@fitzroy6970 Just press trigger? Only one threatening to nuke whole world is Ruzzia. IF rest of the world didn't have nukes as well ruzkiez would've killed entire humanity already
1
@Johnconner1298 And? You act as if it's bad thing to be scared of a country with long history of genocide and oppression on your and other people right next to it. Rofl you ruzkiez are so try hards. But you lost the ww3 the moment Finland joined NATO. Ruzkiez will never achieve their imperial goals now.
1
@AdamEzraOfficial They tried 8 months same city and failed.
1
@colindavis1496 So if partial mobilization was enough to make them run out of equipment and supplies... What makes you think that "fully mobilized" orc army would be a threat? More meat to the grinder?
1
@weelou4203 Okraine is literally pushing
1
@kevindamarray7463 So why would ruzkiez then start it?
1
@Viku-m9e Okraine got supplies only several months after holding on their own, and they mostly got outdated equipment that were left in the old storehouses. Now they are getting latest stuff. Also Okraine is still small and lacks population. While entire regions is hard to defend due to being flat and no forests. Ruzkiez are failing hard
1
@xFlow777 Umm what? Before war Okraine had outdated equipment and less people in army than Finland.
1
@rosieroblox4874 Imagine laughing at people's miseries. You're living evidence of ruzkiez being enemy of humanity.
1
@xFlow777 rofl ruzkie removed his comment. You're attacking and even your own president has made his imperial dreams open.
1
@xFlow777 You claimed that Ruzzia has no reason to wage war and invade. I proved you wrong
1
@xFlow777 Yes they had less people than Finland. Your point was useless for obvious reason. You're ruzkie pretending as if Okraine had best army ever. While in truth it was just bunch of farmers until Westerners came and gave them education and actual weaponry. No one was planning on attacking Okraine? You kidding? Ruzzia started the war around 8-years ago. Finland has prepared 1/5 of it's entire population to fight against Ruzzia and has been preparing for it 70-years.
1
@blackgoatee9535 They gained NATO weapons only recently and the moment they gained NATO weapons they actually started to push ruzkiez away.
1
@fisherflush Knowing actual veterans. They would laugh at ruzzia.
1
@jamesgreen8573 Actual loss counts. Ruzkiez lost more in a week than USA had within 20-years. The casualties are open records in the west while hidden in Ruzkiez. Ruzzians are known to lie all the time and lack empathy toward other humans. Fix that... Lack empathy toward humans, since ruzkiez are worse than animals.
1
@erenjaeger1738 not true. Countries that are part of NATO took several months before any aid to Okraine. Also why is it wrong to help Okraine against genocidal ruzkeiz?
1
@erenjaeger1738 lol you stopped clicking respond and just put the @ there in order to avoid having counter arguments back at you. What is your point? Something wrong with USA helping Okraine?
1
@erenjaeger1738 rofl keep on lying ruzkie
1
@erenjaeger1738 nah ruzzianz are incapable to ever be right or to say truths.
1
Umm Arabs were the ones who occupied the region. Israelis are just taking back what is rightfully theirs.
1