Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Students Think Our Planet Is Doomed! | Man on the Street" video.

Climate change is real, but it isn't world ending.
1
@thetumans1394 Objectively speaking... False The level of change is nothing in comparison to how hot this planet was in the past while it still had advanced life forms and ecosystems. It will simply change regional climates but it won't destroy life on the planet, nor will it ruin crops globally. This is nothing but fearmongering from communists who wish to state taking over everything, while ignoring that socialist and communist countries are biggest polluters on the planet.
1
@thetumans1394 Socialism, society where means of productions and distribution of goods are owned/controlled by the collective/government. Seeks to abolish private sector. Communism, Classless and stateless society where private sector and property has been abolished. every society that is self-proclaimed as socialist or communists has been terrible places to live. You are way over your league if you think you can win me in debate.
1
@thetumans1394 When were talking about socialism and capitalism in real world, we are talking about spectrum. Since not that many countries falls into 100% of either one of them. According to the research data, the countries with most economic freedom (aka more capitalistic) are creating less pollution that those with less economic freedom. China is good example of a country that is major polluters, to the point that they had even destroyed their own country's ecosystem and caused desertification in disastrous scale. Also you ignored my previous reply. This just proves that you have nothing to add there and you lack intellectual honesty to admit it. Again... You're far over your league. You're not even challenging.
1
@thetumans1394 I have debated you and refuted each and every claim you have spouted. I simply added to the end how you're over your league in here. Seems like it was a sore spot for you. You are trying to debate with someone who has over hundreds of thousands of debates in his life time over multiple different topics. "You can have Capitalist countries more economic freedom, you can have Capitalist countries with less economic freedom, they are still all capitalist." Capitalism is defined by private ownership and control of people's own property, and free trade. Meaning country that limits what you can own and regulates trade is no longer what one could call as full pledged capitalism. "You can even argue that Socialism allows for more economic freedom by ending worker exploitation, arguing that allowing exploitation is freedom is the same as saying allowing slavery is freedom" There is no exploitation of the workers, voluntarily working with someone in order to get resources in return is exploitation. Trade is not exploitation. You're not a slave just because you can't steal from others. "Secondly, you have confused correlation and causation when you stated that China pollutes more due to being state capitalis" State capitalism is nothing but semantics. It's not capitalist in that sense. It's socialist country that has lately allowed more freedom to trade. Socialist country ruled by communist party. Both China, USSR and Cuba were text book definitions of communist/socialist societies. Heck they even followed marx's manifesto by the book. It's normal for people to have common things and different things they enjoy. I don't see anything weird in that.
1
No, she is right. She is part of the upper middle-class. She won't be starving everyone below her economic class will be though.
1