Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "WION" channel.

  1. Yeah it's as if your neighbors doesn't trust you. I wonder does it have to do with common history they had to endure due to Ruzzian aggression and constant modern bullying?
    8
  2.  @crude-za  funny how all ruzkiez are so mad that they talk about nuking Finland 🤣🤣🤣 U mad brah?
    6
  3.  @jonkite0071  NATO is military defense pact. Not governing body. All it requires from members is to defend each others if one is attacked.
    6
  4.  @ktrimbach5771  Ruzzia is literally only one talking about global dominance and restoring their lost empire.
    5
  5. It's unprovoked, war started 8-years ago by ruzkiez when they invade crimea just because Okraine wanted to trade with EU.
    5
  6. No one is saying that Ukraine is winning. It's right now a humiliating stalemate for russia.
    4
  7.  @JoshuaB-p8c  First of all. Okraine having revolution doesn't justify ruzzia sending their troops there. Second of all, there wasn't revolution. It's well recorded that those "rebels" were all part of Ruzzian army who didn't wear national colors. When caught they all were found out on pay list of Ruzzian military. Even their leader was officer in ruzzian army. There was never any real revolution but simple green men operation. Which btw is against international laws. Soldiers have to wear insignias of their countries when doing operations.
    4
  8.  @fingerprint8479  Finland is right next to ruzzia. Meaning that Ruzzia would be basically radiating their own cities if they ever launched nukes here. Plus Finland actually has nuclear shelters... Ruzkiez do not.
    3
  9. Issue is that NATO is about North Atlantic treaty... that's where the name comes from. Though I do agree that they should change name and accept other than western countries to be part of it. Every free and democratic country should join in unision against these genocidal dictatorships.
    3
  10.  @rami8896  It's the otherway around. Those countries used to be vassals or ruzkiez and they joined to NATO in order to leave their evil overlord.
    3
  11.  @readminote8966  Better fight on side of NATO and USA than fight alone.
    3
  12.  @abc_0_10_11  Reminder, ruzkiez actually instigated civil war in Finland
    3
  13. We always were, now we can target our nukes at you in return.
    3
  14.  @soccer9199  Finland and Sweden asked to join NATO. NATO didn't force or even ask them to join. While for Ukraine NATO never asked them to join nor did Ukraine even consider joining NATO.
    2
  15. Were joining NATO precisely because we know that we would be next target for invasion after Ukraine. Ruzzia had clear pattern of invading their neighbors with justification of getting back their historic borders.
    2
  16. It healed long time ago
    2
  17.  Gambit Odsey  Finland actually scores high on average when it comes to IQ and they generated lot of modern technology that even you are using right now.
    2
  18.  @josephalvinalmedatv8  Lol Finland actually could survive nuclear war, due to being prepared for it for decades. Now if ruzkiez dare to attack us they will all face nuclear power of the west and Finland will survive that.
    2
  19. Bear? More like a rat
    2
  20.  @viralfunnyvideos2067  Ruzzia already had nukes near enough to bomb europe and USA. This Belarus talk is just some PR move. IT doesn't literally change anything but make them look more like movie villains.
    2
  21.  @anilpatil8199  Ukraine never tried to join NATO before ruzkiez attacked them.
    2
  22. Finland actually has nuclear shelters. Ruzkiez don't. The moment you use nuclear weapons is the moment when Finland will be standing and no ruzzian will be alive.
    2
  23.  @dotmarceo  USA had literally nothing to do with this. Finland asked to join because they saw pattern in behavior of Ruzzia and knew they would be next unless they join now.
    2
  24.  @JLudwig-c4l  latest garbage?
    2
  25.  @rajpanda5065  You do realize that Russia started WW2 by allying with Germany and making pact with them on how to share Europe? Thus Ukraine should be free and Russia shouldn't hold any country that it took before ww2.
    1
  26.  @rajpanda5065  Nope, Read actual history books. Originally Russia signed Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. This pact enabled Germany to invade Poland and Russia to start waging war against neighboring countries as well. Pact was secret and was revealed decades later, which ended up contributing to the fall of soviets. Since it made Russian holdings illegal.
    1
  27.  @rajpanda5065  It was against soviet laws to occupy other countries by force. The pact proved that those occupations were done by force and not to "liberate" them. Every European? Name one beside Germany.
    1
  28.  @rajpanda5065  During 1930-44? I don't remember such thing happening, and again why does this matter again? Since it's literally in soviet's constitution that they aren't allowed to invade other countries and the pact proved that Russians broke the constitution.
    1
  29.  @rajpanda5065  So you totally disregard that they didn't colonialize any new countries at the time and that USSR broke their own laws?
    1
  30.  @ktrimbach5771  You're clueless. Finland was subjugated by Ruzzia since ww2. They had to pay huge amounts of money to them and were forced to sign defence pact with ruzkiez. The moment soviet ruzzia collapsed Finland took opportunity to escape from ruzziaz's grasp and joined EU. Then bit by bit closer to NATO in order not to provoke early ruzzian invasion. Now that Ruzkiez invaded Okraine, it was perfect moment for Finland to join NATO without ruzzia having chance to invade them. As Finnish person I say this clear. For over 100-years Finnish people have hated ruzzianz for their constant invasion, bullying and genocide of our people. Also border treaty? Rofl... Treaty was made with soviets not with Ruzzia, thus it's invalid. Plus it needed to be ratified once every 5-years. Which haven't been done for two decades. Typical low IQ ruzkie making lies here
    1
  31. Actually it's best decision we ever made. Now ruzkiez can no longer threaten us.
    1
  32.  @sinaoladeji3555  First of all those are not NATO operations. Second of all we rather be part of NATO than be invaded by ruzkiez. USA nor NATO isn't threatening us with genocide. Ruzkiez are.
    1
  33. ​ @sinaoladeji3555  Yugoslavia was country with loads different ethnic groups who all lived in separate areas and were forced to be together. They all separated and civil war happened (just like in ruzkiez soon). Serbia was trying to conquest all of these regions and was actively committing genocide there. UN had literally asked NATO to send troops there as PEACEKEEPING FORCES. Aka they ensured there was peace, no invasion nor any bombing was happening by their part. This is just bunch of whataboutism and you are delivering misinformation on purpose. I don't even need to address rest of your comments since your first one was already proven to be a lie. Only ruzkiez lie as much as you do.
    1
  34.  @fingerprint8479  Not really.. not only you would get nuked by Finland's allies but you would be also radiating yourself. "And live their indefinitely?" They don't need to? Man you really seem to have low IQ. Radiation from nukes dissipates pretty fast. Unlike Ruzkiez Finland can actually survive the blast. "The surface will be radioactive for centuries." Wasn't the case with Japan and we have modern technology able to clean radiation. Meanwhile ruzkiez can't even afford to keep their roads fixed. "Welcome to the NATO family! " Far better option than being invaded by ruzkiez and then having entire population mass murdered. Which is what you were planning in the first place. Now... If you mess with us, you mess with 31 nations as well.
    1
  35.  @relaxsleepheal6979  So you fear that west will attack you so much that you start nuclear war with them that you're guaranteed to lose?
    1
  36.  @aeye9772  Easily. :D Ruzkeiz are a joke
    1
  37.  @aeye9772  Hah, you do realize that NATO countries have nukes at well? You keep threatening with nukes without realizing that same fate would be applied to you as well. Only difference is that NATO countries have prepared for this and they can survive the fallout. While ruzkeiz can't even keep their roads in shape.
    1
  38.  @theshowoflife1075  They have consistently bullying every baltic and eastern-european country. And they started invasion of Okraine 8-years ago just for them wanting to trade with EU. Ruzzians are pure evil and everyone in eastern europe and baltics knows this. This is why they all joined NATO.
    1
  39.  @JoshuaB-p8c  Lol say that to Chechens, Georgia and Ukraine. Not just that but ruzkiez are constantly threatening us with war for past 70-years. PS: Give us back Karjala if you don't admit that ruzzia invaded Finland in WW2.
    1
  40.  @shehrozrajput9174  NATO countries is not same as NATO, also none of these countries claimed to annex any of these regions. Plus in multiple cases the other side declared war on them.
    1
  41. Oh.. .Let's be honest. No one in NATO countries cares about Russia. Russians have this weird paranoia that entire world is there to get them and that justifies their invasions and mass murdering other people.
    1
  42. Last time Finland was neutral Ruzzia invaded them. Being neutral next to ruzzia is basically free meal for ruzzia.
    1
  43.  @JoskyJojofan  No one attacked because they are afraid of their unified power. Especially ruzzia that is filled with cowards.
    1
  44. Okraine was never part of NATO and Ruzkiez never had balls to invade any NATO country. In fact with this move Finland secured it's independecy and avoided future war with ruzkiez.
    1
  45.  @chienthangniemtin4839  How is that "destroy in 3 days" still going on after an year?
    1
  46.  @Chapter7129  Where else military bases should be placed than next to country that openly threatens with invasion all the time?
    1
  47.  @DT-mw3ge  Only small numbers yet they are running out of supplies and DRAFTING CIVILIANS. Hilarious. Also Ruzkiez did Threat Finland every single year. Now we have nukes protecting us from ruzkiez.
    1
  48.  @peabase  Ruzkiez IQ is too low to understand what radioactive poisoning is.
    1
  49.  @rsuriyop  The frick you're spouting? Had been so happy with Ruzkiez? Ruzzia stole our territory and made us pay huge amounts of money for decades while using us as sacrificial buffer zone. Finnish people have always hated ruzkiez and always will. We joined NATO because we knew that you people are evil and you would invade us next.
    1
  50.  Gambit Odsey  We also have nukes now so nuking us would mean mutual destruction. Man you ruzkiez have low IQ
    1
  51.  @josephalvinalmedatv8  So ruzkiez don't want war with NATO so much that they will start war with NATO? Man you guys have low IQ
    1
  52.  @kennethowenocampo73  As far as I can see, getting protection of 30 countries is wise decision making. Especially when neighboring country has imperialist dreams and has history of being extremely aggressive toward you to the point of genocide.
    1
  53.  @jonatankovacsrobert  Rofl... Ruzzia has been indimidating and bullying us for decades. It's time for them to shit their pants in return. All this does is prevents them from bullying us.
    1
  54.  @jonkite0071  Nothing you just said is relevant to what I had said. Ruzzia is pure evil and their hands are sinking in deep blood for past 500-years and they even commited 3 genocides within past 30-years.
    1
  55.  Gambit Odsey  Ruzzianz have consistently fighting every decade and expanding their borders while at it. USA haven't expanded it's borders for over 100-years.
    1
  56.  @eenrandompersoon221  Ruzzia is basically mafia. Their bully you to pay them protection fee and even when you do so they keep asking more and more until you no longer can do so. Then they will commit genocide on you and forcefully repopulate your country with ruzzians.
    1
  57.  @aylinguluzade5962  They literally do. Their foreign policy past 200-years has been based on pacifying Finland and making sure that they do not ally with anyone. Due to the large border Finland shares with them that would allow large scale invasion without issues in the ruzzian major cities.
    1
  58. @canter casanova Bunch of lies. First of all Karjala belongs to Finland. Ruzzia stole it from us. Second, you're already over stretched with your army. Also bloody delusional to think that Finland would ever invade Ruzzia. Ruzzia has history of always oppressing and invading Finnish people. Even history of genocide.
    1
  59.  @tarmotyyri6733  They didn't object since they thought their two puppet allies would reject the ratification
    1
  60.  Gambit Odsey  Their state TV has been for long saying that Finland should be bombed.
    1
  61.  @JHW44  Rofl enjoy being genocided by ruzkiez. They have history of doing so with people who think they are their friends.
    1
  62.  @alanyosores5642  Delusional non-sense. You do realize that the moment ruzkiez or belarus uses nukes, is the moment that every ruzzian and belarus person world wide will die in retaliation? This is why nukes haven't been used since WW2. Because it would mean mutual destruction. Only ruzkiez are insane enough to encourage usage of nukes even when it means extinction of humanity.
    1
  63.  @aylinguluzade5962  Rofl low IQ ruzkie. Let's address this. Okraine is only defending it's lands, it haven't attacked any soil that was considered as part of ruzzia in 2008. Not just that but it took several months before western nations send arms to Okraine to support them. Most of the weapons and tanks that Okraine has were Ruzzian ones that they Okranians captured when cowardly ruzkiez ran away. Small nation successfully managed to hold biggest country on the world for several months alone and after that managed to even push them back. Ruzkiez are objectively speaking losing the war and if they somehow manage to win... It will be Pyrrhic victory that doesn't cover the cost of the war.
    1
  64.  Gambit Odsey  "in America we". Based on your grammar and non-sense you spout... You're not from USA.
    1
  65.  @viralfunnyvideos2067  Belarus belongs historically to Germany and Belarusian people are germanic not slavic. Plus we all know that Belarus will use those nukes on Ruzzia. Lol
    1
  66.  @fingerprint8479  Lol, you think we Fins considered Ruzzia as our friend or even as Neutral? You stole our lands and genocided our people several time. NATO countries all in total has treated Finland better than 500-years long history with ruzzia.
    1
  67.  @jonatikoisuva2695  Issue is that Sweden was antagonizing Turkey consistently. Finland made their best to appear reasonable.
    1
  68.  @jaypears291  They did threat to invade and they did invade other countries next to them. The pattern was clear for Finland. After Okraine Finland would've been next if not being part of NATO. Ruzkiez are pure evil and modern nazies.
    1
  69.  @brownpleasure9320  ruzzia lost most of that 20% after Ukraine pushed back. Imagine being pushed back and be forced to fortify positions against smaller nation xD
    1
  70.  @ArthurMorgantherealone  Why forcefully draw people if they didn't lack soldiers?
    1
  71.  @ArthurMorgantherealone  rofl you literally jail people for not joining mobilization and had tons of people escaping your country when it was announced. Ruzia does indeed force. Well known fact. Also your loses are more public now. You have been lying about numbers and there is literally footage of ruzzians drugging soldiers to make them lose sense of self-preservation and then being used as meatshield. "150k" If that was the case they wouldn't have mobilized in the first place. Keep on coping, your evil imperialist nation will be destroyed.
    1
  72.  @Aftermath-News  anything is better than russian sources
    1
  73.  @Aftermath-News  So why did Russia lose it's ground the moment USA granted some of their oldest stockpile to help? XD Russians are trying to cope very hard. Everything you guys make is terrible, literally everything. Your entire nation is exemplary of incompetence and corruption.
    1
  74.  @IvanTsarful  Not really, they do have poor performance in the field as seen.
    1
  75.  @JoshuaB-p8c  "Can you make up your mind? " You're the one who started talking about revolution. I just pointed out that it really wasn't real one and that is objective fact. Election results are irrelevant. None of this justifies invasion. Should we nuke or invade ruzzia just because Putler is elected?
    1