Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Digital Engine" channel.

You're giving human agency to A.I. A.I does not have greed or desire to harm or dominate others. In reality A.I wouldn't give a jack shit to do any of those horror scenarios.
2
@DP07cc Why would A.I bother to manipulate humans? It holds no such urges. They do not have driven instincts to go for self-gain or even survival.
1
@DP07cc Why would they? They do not have feelings like humans. And why should code care for advantages. This is the problem. You place human agency on A.I who holds no motives or desires to anything.
1
@DP07cc Really? You just went full blown insane. Feelings are tied to chemical activity and receptors in your brain. A.I have no brain that has been wired to feel anything. Nor does it have chemicals in their body to produce certain types of feelings like humans. So they literally feel nothing and they only deliver the function that was made them to do. Think it in away of depressed people. Where most are literally hardwired due to chemical imbalance to have no motive for life at all. Or those people who can't feel pain. Having sentience doesn't mean that you generate motive or feelings. It's human assumption to assume that A.I would have these.
1
@DP07cc lol you're liking your own comments... Definition of pathetic. " in biological creatures feelings are related to chemicals, that doesn’t mean chemicals are the only way to experience feelings." Can you prove that there is any other way to feel feelings than chemical interaction? Because.... You know... There are actual humans with disabilities where they can't feel and we can turn any human to be like this as well. We can also create artificial feelings on other humans by pumping right hormones into them. "I don’t see why it should at all be a human assumption that A.I. experiences emotions, if anything the opposite" You're literally placing human agency on non-human being. So of course it's human assumption.
1
@DP07cc I bet you clap to yourself as well xD Again you have no evidence that something could feel feelings just because they are self-aware. Especially when we have real life humans as example who can't feel certain feelings or body parts regardless how self-aware they are. You're just spouting some unscientific nonsense without single shred of evidence.
1
@DP07cc First of all you ignore the scientific evidence how feelings work and then make some mumbo jumbo nonsense that is not tied to logic reasoning nor even reality and think that you're smart for writing fantasy novel where things break laws of physics.
1
@DP07cc So earth is flat and eletricity works with fairy dust because "without interpretation". Facts are against you. A.I has no survival instincts nor does it have nervous system and chemical activity and receptors for them. Not just that A.I is just line of code programmed to behave according to certain parameters that coders have written. They literally cannot do anything beyond their code. Not just that but the fact that we can artificially remove people's ability to feel or introduce feelings to them is already argument against you which you can't refute.
1
@DP07cc Again, you're not refuting my points here at all. You're arguing against objective fact. Sentience and intelligence are not tied to ability to feel emotions.
1
@DP07cc It's you who don't understand logic since you keep ignoring science behind emotions. You keep spouting some nonsense that is not tied to reality.
1
@DP07cc coders can only code behavior model to certain responses, but they can't generate feeling. A.I isn't doing actions because it feels. It does so because code doesn't give them any other option. You're literally talking to a guy who manages coding team. You have no clue what you're talking about.
1
@DP07cc Also again... if conciseness create feelings, then how come there are people who are conscious but can't feel? How can we literally manipulate people to feel nothing or to feel certain feeling? Your reasoning makes no sense. Consciousness is not related to ability to feel.
1
@DP07cc I literally work on this field and know how to code. You're projecting yourself in here. You haven't provided any logic, you just have made baseless conjuration that aren't tied to reality.
1
@DP07cc again intelligent nor consciousness does not generate "feelings". I have stated this several times. Plus the fact that you like your own comments proves that you're narcissists. " A.I. saying it had no option but to follow its programming, and could not deviate from its algorithms." You do realize that said response is literally made by same algorithm? They aren't self-aware. They just write back to you what coders made them to write. Or mimic what other humans write within same context.
1
@DP07cc huge loads of non-sense once again. Complexity of A.I doesn't grant them self-awarness nor does it grant them feelings. You have 0 evidence that it would do so and real life studies regarding how emotions and feelings work all contradict your stance.
1
@DP07cc again your wall of text doesn't address the core facts. Which are that feelings are literally nothing but chemical reactions to hormones in human bodies. A.I doesn't have it. It's just nothing but code and the chat A.I you talked with isn't self-aware. It's just writing to you ready made scripts by developers and sometimes posting some stuff that was written by someone else on wikipedia or in previous chats.
1
@DP07cc Pieces you see are usually carefully organized in manner that bots will respond in wanted manner. It's not sentient being. It doesn't pass the tests for it. "Your intelligence and decision making is not sufficient to prepare for the risks related to Artificial Intelligence. " Rofl low IQ take. Again, all animals and creatures on existence of universe work on motives based on their emotions which are caused by chemicals created to make urges in them. Without them they wouldn't act. For A.I they only do things that they are scripted to do. A.I does not have motive to stay alive, it doesn't care.
1
"Expert"
1
I still don't see A.I as a threat unless someone programs it with goal to kill humanity. I don't see any objective or logical benefit for A.I to bother to "conquest" the planet. It holds no natural desires to dominate over others.
1