Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. Thinking Out Loud IF you cannot make accurate predictions with it. Then it's not proven.
    1
  2. Thinking Out Loud I actually have. It's pseudoscience at it's best. Really surprised that it did pass peer reviewers.
    1
  3. So according to you... You know better than the guy himself was he ISIS or radicalized? He killed them because Quran tells them to kill gays. "Why the FBI wanted to withhold information about his homosexual past from the media?" Because it's still pure hypothesis, not only that but also irrelevant.
    1
  4. ℛɛᴛʀᴏ ℛɛᴅ Oh boy.. You do realize why martys in ISlam usually come from people who weren't that religious? Because with martyrdom they earn they place in heaven, regargless how they acted before it.
    1
  5. Organic isn't labeled because of it's danger. It's a marketing ploy. It's same as selling tuna and having label that no dolphins were killed while doing it. It's same as "light" cola. It's a label which isn't really needed but they use it in order to increase sales and you are only allowed to use it if it meets the definition of organic. GMO companies can do the same but it's up to them do they want to use it or not, same goes for organic, nothing forces you to give organic label to your product. Learn the fucking difference of forced label, and labeling on your own free will.
    1
  6. @M M 5-years old discussion. Everything that we eat can be considered as bio-engineered. Not a single plant that we eat, actually grows like that in the wild. GMO technology is simply more precise than selective breeding.
    1
  7. digitalbookworm5678 That is just outright retarded claim what you made here. It's not that everyone is armed, it was that the person was acting suspicious enough to be the actual shooter.
    1
  8. digitalbookworm5678 " I said they're treated as though they're armed. Paranoia strikes deep." And so fucking what? My point still stands. I never made claim that you said that everyone is armed. My point was pretty clear. That idiot was behaving like a criminal who was about to get caught.
    1
  9. That is like saying that no sane man cares if someone is psychopath. Now before any idiot jumps in and thinks that I have something against gays by pointing out how silly his analogy was... I should mention to you, I have literally nothing against gays or their rights.
    1
  10. Jane Lin Hey idiot. According to OP only reason someone cares about something if they feel insecure.
    1
  11. +Austin Fehrer Or maybe they don't want to vote for a guy who says that white people don't know poverty?
    1
  12. Wait... How can you say that someone is not good business man when empirically he is very successful in that area? That's like saying that X is a bad doctor even though he saves 99% people. Simply because he happened to get good education, and money to have good equipment.
    1
  13. +Beers For Jeers Last time I did check politics in USA are nothing but entertainment.
    1
  14. +Rock Mask They are in same network. Leftists version of fox news.
    1
  15. +curioussebastian 9 people does. But so far no one cared about you.
    1
  16. ***** I don't think that anyone is arguing against getting training before buying the gun. Nor should be against background checks. But there are people who advocate total gun ban, and this seems to be the case of David's channel. Since they are crying every gun incident that happens. Weirdly enough all of them are accidents. Gun accidents can't happen if no one owns them. But they can happen even in trained hands. Personally I don't give a shit are guns illegal or not for the same ground I don't give a shit is marijuana illegal or not. I just happen to realize that only one who benefits from banning are criminal organizations.
    1
  17. bisquitnspanky See my point? It's easy to say "no we don't want total ban" while in fact some people want total ban. And it's easy to say "everyone are okay with some rules" when there is someone who doesn't want any rule at all. My point stands and you did just prove it. "On the other hand, there simply is no movement in existence in the US to ban guns outright. None." whatever people have mobilized to go against all guns is different from do they exists. The fact that in Japan there is total ban already proves that there are people who think that guns should be banned.
    1
  18. bisquitnspanky Of course they are spending millions if they whole lively hood is depending on it. They would be retards for not trying to sell as much as possible. Those random individuals can group up anytime and try to make their demands come true, it's irrelevant if they haven't done it yet in America. Point is they exists and every video david makes implies that is how it should be done.
    1
  19. bisquitnspanky Why are you bringing religion here? I fucking atheists anyway. Oh wait you're trying to poison the well in here. Bit too obvious and proves that you're dishonest person. " Hope you can sleep while trembling in fear about what David Pakman thinks. " Why would I fear what he thinks? You make no sense in here. "BTW I've never once heard David or anyone else on his show suggest an all out ban. " They are literally making statement about every gun incident that happens in country. No matter how small the gun is. Then they talk about how nothing would've happened if that gun didn't exists. In some of these cases they were just originally people who would've had license for gun anyway. They just had accident. Yes they clearly imply with their videos that gun should be banned. You don't need to say something directly. The way they show their news and talk about them points it out. In fact one of the examples how some people indirectly point their opinions can be seen in Hitler before he got in power. There is a reason why in Europe we are very careful against hate speech, or speech which is between the gray area.
    1
  20. bisquitnspanky Talk about ad hominems when your whole reply back to my rebuttal toward you was huge ad hominem. In fact your comment proves how little you know about politics and history of mankind. How come I can't use nazies subtlety as example of David being subtle about his position over guns? You literally are too stupid to even be allowed to comment.
    1
  21. bisquitnspanky It was by very definition ad hominem what you said. You totally dismissed everything I said based on your opinion about me. You didn't even address my points.
    1
  22. bisquitnspanky I did counter everyones claims. I'm sorry but not everyone accept everything people say to them blindly. None of you did successfully refute my counter arguments. And the fact that you still keep talking even though I used your very own logic against you is just hilarious. "But criminals can just buy swat suits and pretend to be cops" So fucking hilarious when you didn't even consider criminals wearing cop uniforms and asking him to come out nicely xD Oh best of all. nice ad hominem again :P
    1
  23. bisquitnspanky How did you even end up with conclusion of dictatorship here? Did I tell any orders here? Nope, did I say that you should shut up? Nope. so in other words this is bad attempt from you to try to form insult. Even though ironically dictator word would fit you perfectly here. Not to mention your whole comment is crazy as fuck. When was last time you took your meds? Take contact to local Shrink. You really look like you have issues even in real life. PS: I mixed you up with another idiot who thinks that cops should just kindly knock the door and wait for criminal to come out.
    1
  24. bisquitnspanky You do realize that you already lost this debate when you decided to act like that?
    1
  25. bisquitnspanky http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/debate ": a discussion between people in which they express different opinions about something" You sir just proved how idiotic you are if you really didn't comprehend that this was debate the moment you decided to discuss about your opinions.
    1
  26. bisquitnspanky Good that you admit it.
    1
  27. Why is this even a news?
    1
  28. Alfie Gonzalez It's really not a exposing at all. Every faction including atheists says the same. This isn't news worthy news. Nothing more than a propaganda post. 
    1
  29. Alfie Gonzalez My point still stands. Your red herring argument won't  change it. "You do have to explain the "propaganda" thing though. Are you saying her cheating on her husband is a liberal plot to defame this girl?" You don't seem to understand what propaganda means. Propaganda doesn't necessary mean lying to the public. noun 1. information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc. Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/propaganda This news channel can be called as propaganda channel by all right.
    1
  30. Nickypoo Yes it's not valid argument. IT's a SOUND ARGUMENT. Thanks for recognizing the fact. :) The rape and this situation are same. With your reasoning people shouldn't ever provide examples because examples never are exactly the same as the situation.  Also you don't make this kind of mistakes. Also she was harmed. They intentionally made her have offspring that she clearly didn't want to have. Also rape doesn't always mean violent. But I guess you were too stupid to figure it out. She was forced to carry a child of a man that she didn't want to have. If something that is pretty much like rape but without sex. part.
    1
  31. Contonnia Turner rofl the very first sentence of your comment already counters your whole comment. Word "typically" made it meaningless. :3 This couple wanted certain kind of child, not just any kind of child. And there might be far more reasons than just "being racists" for example child resembling parents would make sure that kid doesn't get teased in school or kid doesn't need to know that she/he was born through this method. But it's clear that you weren't smart enough to think this far. This can be easily compared to rape. Because in both scenarios result were the same. Person is forced to hold a child of a person they never wanted to hold in the first place. Even a raped woman can love a child of that rape, but that doesn't mean that rapist should get a free of his actions. Talking about violating and trauma just proves how much mentally retarded you are for not getting what EXAMPLE MEANS. Example always means a something similar but not exactly the same and the fact that you didn't get this means that you're fucking idiot.
    1
  32. Nickypoo It's sound argument. Awww did you become butthurt over one insult? So butthurt that you can't even provide any counter arguments to the points I just made? You really are pathetic individual aren't you? Dismiss others the moment you can't take the heath and call them trolls. Way to go idiot! :3
    1
  33. Contonnia Turner Awww you really are pathetic aren't you? Ad hominems doesn't make you mature nor civilized adult at all. In fact mature person would point out faults in someone's reasoning instead of resorting to bullshit that you're doing now. Do you even know what ad hominem means?
    1
  34. Machines can't replace humans perfectly. We need to maintain them and design them. It just means that in far future most jobs are intellectually demanding instead of mundane repetition.
    1
  35. realCevra No they can't replace humans perfectly until you figure out how to make them self aware and able to do creative thinking.
    1
  36. realCevra It would be so far that we wouldn't even give a shit about jobs nor money in that case anyway.
    1
  37. realCevra Your argument fails to the point that you never had any premises explaining why you need system to distribute wealth. In distant utopia future that you're thinking would be time when people don't give a shit about money since technology grants everything for everyone anyway. Ever watched star trek? Same idea.
    1
  38. realCevra In matter of fact it's possible, unless you're not trying to make word play with "EVERYTHING", but if you're honest and mean good living standards then it's very possible could be done even now if world's population would drastically decrease. IT all depends on the size of population. Due technology increase and education. Population growth as been in decline in countries which are advanced. It's not far of to believe that in far future it would be in level where everyone can have good stuff. They don't have money in star trek unless they are dealing with other cultures incase you haven't noticed..
    1
  39. So sander is confirmed as corporate shill and sell out? He did just destroy his credibility.
    1
  40. I believe that hi is down mostly because people realized how full of BS he is. He is believes in gender wage gap. Myth that has been debunked long time ago.
    1
  41. Daniel Hawkins Sanders believes in gender wage gap. Which is proven to be false. He is too old to learn anything new. Hence he is bad candidate.
    1
  42. Daniel Hawkins It has been. And no the data feminists have is flawed. They never did take into account people's different career choices, nor their education, nor their working hours, how often they are sick, how many decided to become housewifes instead, working experience. Etc. Once those factors were taken in, the wage gap pretty much disappeared. Everyone earns the same from same job
    1
  43. Jose SB Rodriguez Can't provide link. Too many idiots who have disagreed with me have false flagged so many times that youtube will remove any comment where I provide link. You have to google it out on your own. 
    1
  44. Rob McCune Rofl, only a true moron would say something like that instead of providing refutation on anything I have said.
    1
  45. Alex Google Plus 1. That's funny ,because only people who haven't researched believe in wage gap. 2. Oh the irony... Let's totally forget the lies bernie supporters have told about trump? :D
    1
  46. Rob McCune Again I told you to google, I can't provide links on youtube. I know that comment will be removed immediately. "would be stupid enough vote for Hillary over Bernie" Hell no, Hillary is worse.  There are only two options to vote. Bernie or trump. Rest of the people are total shills. However Bernie doesn't think in longterm at all and refuses to check facts.
    1
  47. Spider-Guy Sure, enjoys the same fate as greek did. ". You can vote for whatever dumbass candidate you want. " Sorry but I'm not an american. I'm actually only objective one in here. Since I don't have anything on stake.
    1
  48. Rob McCune " Once again your complaints about Bernie, short term thinking and refusing to check facts applies much more to Trump. " Not making things up, and again bernie will fuck your country greatly in the long run. Believe it or not. 
    1
  49. Spider-Guy " Funny Greek is a Christian place that's main reason that place is fucked. " lol nope, that wasn't the reason why they fucked up. They had too many socialistic programs and economy couldn't handle it. Read it up. Literally nothing to do with christianity. And don't get me wrong, I'm atheist so I'm not defending christianity in here.
    1
  50. Rob McCune So according to you person has to be crazy in order not to like bernie? Rofl do you even listen to yourself? you act like fundamental christian when someone says that jesus isn't real.
    1