Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Donald Trump Doesn't Denounce Racist Anti-Muslim Lunatic" video.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+ChristianIce First of all Jesus sword talk is literally a metaphor. He explains it same time. His point is that people have to choose between him and their parents. Not about waging war. Read with context for fuck sake.
"but, whatever, he's seen as "the ultimate forgiving guy"."
Not really only an idiot like yourself would say that. He only forgives if you believe in him. Atheist like me will get a lot of shit regardless what I do in my life.
"The first is that this allows the ultimate cherry-picking,"
First of all when compared Islam, that is far better option than no option for cherry picking. Yes, in Islam it's impossible to cherry pick.
"yet picking any old testament passage when it's convenient...but, hey, I am still the good guy, because jesus!"
Because christianity is based in the new testament not to old one. Old one is just background. What makes them different from the Jews is the what Jesus did and said.
"The second is what you were talking about, and it's "forgiveness"
Now, looks like you can do the fuck you want, but if you repent, it's ok."
According to Christianity yes. I know that is fucked up but that is the case.
"That bitch that won't release marriage licences.
There you have "christianity"."
??? Who? Marriage licenses? What the fuck are you gibbering?
"She can impose her will on others, just because it's her faith and her jesus is good, therefore whatever she thinks is automatically good."
False, and you know it. She does bad, but she will be forgiven as long as she believes in Jesus. Being forgiven from something doesn't make behavior acceptable. Someone can forgive murderer of his parents but that doesn't mean that he think that murder is act of good.
"It's evidence that there is nothing "better" in being a christian, there's just the excuse of jesus to behave the way you want."
Rofl the opposite. Because the very fact that it's easy to cherry pick bible makes it better than Islam. That is the reason why scientific progress did start from the west after the medieval ages. In Islam the book literally goes against scholars and scientists, saying that they should be killed. While in Bible nothing like that is even implied. Of course church did what it did, but that doesn't mean that ideology itself supports it. Just like communism doesn't support killing, but yet lot of people got killed under it.
The fact that people can choose to still behave without being total dicks makes it so that we can live in current progressive and secular countries. Name even one secular country where most people are muslims. You can't find any... simply because Islam doesn't leave room for debate.
Hence they cannot be equally bad religions. Otherone at least allows reasonable people be reasonable.
1
-
+ChristianIce
"Yeah, that count as much as a muslims saying "when Allah says that, it's a metaphor". I don't care.
At any point anybody can say "my interpretation is right, yours is wrong".
It's not math, it's just myths."
Literal commandments is different from someone talking in metaphors of what is about to do.
Muslims follow the example of Muhammed, and example he showed is made into a law. There is no metaphors in literal example of killing someone for simply disagreeing with you.
"I believe in him!
It's just a statement, anybody can speak words."
And?
"Yet, muslims are killing each other, so they already show that they can cherrypick enough."
As I pointed out. They are only killing the ones BREAKING THE RULES OF ISLAM. For fuck sake...
Are you really that dense that you couldn't even remember that reply?
"The old testament is valid, they read a passage of it at any celebration, they can take it as valid whenever they want.
"
Again it's irrelevant what happened in old testament since Christianity is based on new one not to the old one. The new testament is what makes them different from Jews. Religion 101. There is a reason why Christians have very different culture than jews have.
"Hood County Clerk Katie Lang.
You can find that story anywhere."
You expect European knowing some random story from USA?
"That alone proves my point."
No it doesn't. It doesn't make them equally fuck up simply for having some fucked up stuff. You're basically saying that child murdering rapists is as bad as someone who simply kills kids.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+ChristianIce
"You can, but you don't have to."
choice that Islam doesn't provide. This alone makes Christianity less barbaric religion.
"The fact that the bible has more contradictions doesn't make it a better book"
It does when it gives good people chance to be good people, instead of forcing them to do disgusting deeds.
"claim they follow the good jesus, and then use all the shit from the old testament to hate on gays, people of color, women."
None of this actually has anything to do with laws of the bible. That hate is justified in the religion itself by pointing that those things are either immoral or just bad for reason X. However gay people can still be gay, it just another sin in eyes of god but they still get to heaven as long as they praise jebus, while fucking another guy.
"If anything, the contradictory structure of the bible makes it worse, not better."
Rofl... well for person like you who doesn't care about lives of others then maybe.
"Name calling won't help your case."
Says guy who have been name calling others.
"Providing something brutal that the Quran allows and the bible doesn't, will."
I Did. I said OP provided quotes. You failed to provide quote which tells exactly the same.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+ChristianIce "I just understand the difference between doctrines and people."
And I understand that people tend to also follow doctrines if they believe that they are true.
"The fact that muslims behave worse, generally, doesn't make Islam worse than christianity."
The fact that their religion supports it without any contradiction makes it so.
"You have to be a complete idiot to miss the difference."
You have to be completely idiot for not realizing how violent tenets of a religion can make good person into suicide bomber.
"The doctrine was the same when christians were the oppressors, the doctrine was the same during the dark ages, it's the same fucking book that is now."
Actually no they weren't. Most christians weren't even capable of reading the bible and Church refused to translate books for the common people. The early christians were a lot different from christians in the dark/medieval age. This was due to the fact that Latin was actually spoken language and christians were capable of understanding the book. Only an idiot like you would totally ignore the fact.
"everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman"
Yet you failed to give one for the other quote. Here is some more:
"Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves."- Qur'an 48.29
"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
- Qur'an 9.29
"O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." - Qur'an 9.73
That last one means that penalty for apostasy is DEATH. Now what is apostasy in christianity?
"You've lost on all the grounds, so have the last comment on this, dear pigeon on the chessboard :D"
Says guy who literally behaved like pigeon most of the time. Usually it's the person who is about to leave the discussion while claiming triumphant is the one who is acting like a pigeon ;)
Now this matches you perfectly. You have been soundly defeated but you fail to acknowledge it. Instead you do pigeon stuff and try to run away.
Edit: Also how the fuck you jump into conclusion that since old testament is also part of Islam, therefore it's all about repetition?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
ChristianIce Nope, enlightenment had nothing to do with it. The people left catholic church and became protestants the moment they could actually read the book. Their views became drastically different at the time.
Before this people had to believe what corrupted priesthood told them.
It seems that you're not really familiar with Martin luther.
Protestants haven't really changed after it.
"You will find a line that teach you to kill the infidel, but you wanted to kill in the first place."
Difference is that in christianity there is line that condemns the said action. While in Islam you can't find anything that would go against it.
"Sure, they put kids there, read the Quran, and they will act accordingly.
But you can tell young german kids how bad are the jews and get the same result."
False equalization. Yes you can brainwash a person, but you can't say that Islam is like everything else. IT's religion that is highly violent one without any excuse.
You're basically stating that we should just give time to ISlam and it will become like christianity today. But you're wrong, because Islam had as much time as christianity, it's just fundamentally different than it.
There is no debate about the commands that mohammed gave.
"..and that's what muslims do, btw.
The Quran forbids to kill another muslim, it says it's the worst crime.
So?
Sunni say "Shia are not real muslims".
Job done, 1 line."
The thing is On muslims someone breaking the rules deserves to die according to them.
And this doesn't match with your talk about jesus. You're taking in this case his words out of context and interpreting them on your own. BUT I REPEAT. IN ISLAM YOU CAN'T INTERCEPT ON YOUR OWN.
Commands are cut and clear. Plus fight with sunni and shia is about who should be leader, they still follow the same rules. They only argue who should be the "pope" of Islam.
1
-
ChristianIce "You know that the vast majority of christians in Europe are catholic, right?"
The most secular countries you can find in europe, are protestants. Catholic church lost lot of it's power back then and the trend kept moving. It was one of the reasons why age of enlightenment was allowed to happen, instead of being snuffed out by inquisition.
And only reason catholic church lost it's power. Because it no longer had monopoly over "truth".
"Maybe islam will never progress, maybe it will, "
This is what I meant. There isn't no such thing as religion progressing. Religions are static. When they progress they become new religion.
Early christians are good example of how christianity was suppose to be. And that was when people could still read and understand the words in scriptures.
"On the comparison on how strict the Quran is and how the bible is open to interpretation, I agree that if you take the Quran alone there's not much space for interpretation, but I remind you it was you, some comments ago, saying that the bible is valid for muslims too.
So, you answered yourself, there."
Old testament, not new testament. Jesus for muslims was totally different, and they comprehend him totally different. They say that jesus christians believe is a lie.
So no, they don't take christian bible seriously on any level.
You don't find a single muslim leader condemning words that mohammed himself have told. In fact mohammed is considered last prophet and only one who's words and examples should be followed.
"and I also know for a fact that muslims can be secular."
Only muslim who doesn't care about his religion, and has most likely born in west. Do you know what word ISlam and Muslim means? By definition one who is in Islam, can't be secular.
"chances are they can find a way to not kill the infidels and stay muslims :)"
You already forgot how they supported ISIS in syria? Or how they did commit genocide not long a go?
1
-
ChristianIce "Maybe muslims will never progress, maybe they will."
Again it implies that it can progress, which religions don't. In case of christianity it was simply people actually able to read the scripture instead of blind trust in a priest.
"You don't find a single christian leader condemning words that Yahweh have told, and Jesus is Yahweh according to christians."
Not all christians think him as yahweh, and again they don't condemn, they don't need. The purpose of Jesus was to make jews change their way. You understand what old testament means? Then guess what new testament is. It's basically new covenant between god and men.
"Yeah, that goes for all abrahamic religions."
No it doesn't, as I already said, christian who cares about his religion is pacifists.
"Turkish metalheads present at my concert (that are the muslims I was talking about) didn't and don't support ISIS."
What makes you think that metal music is against Islam?
"Looks like you think that christians had some kind of inside revolution, while I am telling you that the age of enlightement are the main reason."
For fuck sake they didn't have "revolution". They simply finally could read the book again and act like they were originally acting.
In otherwords they actually learned about their religion. While you live under delusion that most christians could read fucking latin few centuries ago. And understood their religion perfectly.
"Probably bot the protestant reform and the enlightement had a role, yet one called for a clean church, the other for a clean man without religious dogmas."
Clean man without religion was only possible, because christianity wasn't viewed in same way as it was centuries ago. That is thanks to the catholic church losing their monopoly on what scriptures says. They could no longer pull shit up.
You have shown that you have very little understanding over history, especially history of europe.
1
-
ChristianIce "No, it doesn't.
It implies that people can ignore the idiocies of their books, like christians do."
Again serious christians don't ignore it. And the ones who don't ignore it ARE PACIFISTS.
"You know that the teaching of christ are sacred to muslims too, right?"
They have different view of jesus, how thick are you? I said this in comment before.
"Then again, if you ignore the role of the enlightment in the creation of a secular europe, please, don't tell others that they have a little understanding over history.
"
Then again you ignore the reality of world where muslims have been accessed to enlightenment as we do. It wasn't enlightenment that changed, but the religion giving less fuck over what people do.
In order for enlightenment to even take place, you needed less strict religion.
Are you really that silly that you think that muslims haven't heard of ideas of enlightenment? They fucking spitting on those values.
"don't tell others that they have a little understanding over history."
Says guy who has proven to not know shit about european history.
"Sure the protestant reformation was a necessary step, but that's not a reason to say that the same thing couldn't happen also for muslims."
It can't happen to muslims BECAUSE QURAN ISN'T MISREPSESENTED BY A FUCKING CHURCH THAT IS ONLY ONE WHO HAS ACCESS TO IT'S TEXTS.
Got it now? I repeat ISLAM IS NOT MISREPRESENTED, BY AUTHORITARIAN CHURCH WHO REFUSES TO LET ORIGINALLY PEOPLE TO READ IT'S BOOK.
This is why "reformation" was possible. Because it really wasn't a fucking reformation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
ChristianIce
How does quoting it prove it's existance better than fucking naming it?
Okay fucking idiot. I'll quote it for you since you're too fucking stupid to use google.
"In large part, the movement to circumscribe the bounds of free expression has its roots in three instruments of international law—the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 10 of the ECHR, for example, grants the freedom of expression to all, but the exercise of this right is conditioned on conformity with the restrictions necessary, inter alia, "for the protection of the reputation and rights of others." The CERD and ICCPR, which also purport to recognize the freedom of expression, go a step further. Article 4(a) of the CERD obligates signatories to make "all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred" a punishable offense, while Article 20 of the ICCPR requires outlawing "any advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence.""
source legal-project.
And since you live in a cave which explains why you're SJW. Google up what EU just did in this week. Enforcing companies to follow hate speech laws in order to prevent people from telling their opinions.
EU is orwellian nightmare.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1