Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "3 Laws Could Reduce Gun Deaths by 90%" video.

  1. +afaegfsgsdef It's game of semantics. For example they like to avoid using word murder. Instead they label it as gun death so that it looks like that murdering will be reduced by removing/restricting guns. It's pretty typical dishonest approach. They try to make it appear so that guns are reason why people kill. Worse... they act like sociopaths who think that laws are absolute and that no one will break them.
    2
  2. +dethtrain you assume that people are born with violent criminal record. Record has to start from somewhere.
    1
  3. dethtrain Majority mostly always obeys the laws.  You're pretty much making a pointless law.
    1
  4. The Brophinator Technically nazi germany started from people being not satisfied with current regime, hence they voted in extreme party, which made laws which would help them to make sure that they will stay in power. This thing has been going on in europe, and german currently is in brink of starting a civil war due shitty leaders.
    1
  5. Jonny Stugotts "well that's the MAIN STREAM NARRATIVE" MAinstream narrative is that everything is okay and nothing bad is happening in german, no rape events ever happened in new year. That is the mainstream narrative.
    1
  6. +highdough if I would go on rampage I would just use explosives and poison. Both easy as fuck to create with household materials. People who use guns are doing it as way to force police to kill them. Suicide by cops, I assume you guys know what that means.
    1
  7. BioCapsule They are actually easy to make and get knowledge for them if someone bothers to study chemistry. Heck you can even find guides from deep web.
    1
  8. highdough No, they use guns because they are doing suicide by cops. They all know that they are going to die after it. They simply want to go in blazing glory, while taking out people who they hate.
    1
  9. BioCapsule people who are ready to commit murder, tend to have that certain mindset and ready to do lot of effort. "There is however a level of aggression that both explosive & poison does not express. " Irrelevant, what counts is death toll. I would argue that there is more aggresion in stabbing people with kitchen knife than shooting people with ak-47. Should we know ban knives? " for others it more a consequences of wanting to express the aggression that involve more mindless, unrestrained physical "satisfaction". " Most famous cases have always been about having the last stand and die.
    1
  10. highdough Maybe I'm?  However in pretty much all cases psychologists have made statement that they all were committed fully and even prepared for months.
    1
  11. How about 3 laws to prevent murder?
    1
  12. BioCapsule Then how about reduce murder. Murdering is already against law. Why the fuck you guys think that it's good idea to make two laws which do the same thing, expect one makes carrying object illegal.
    1
  13. BioCapsule "Death don't necessary imply murder," Correct, but this is what left has been trying to stage this thing as. They believe that all crimes/most crimes will disappear when people stop using guns. " If you want to talk about "extra", what about that stand-your-ground nonsense... what is it cover is already covered generally under self-defense internationally. " Not really. Generally in west you're not allowed to self defend unless you want to go to jail for hurting the criminal. Also selfdefence means that your enemy has to punch or shoot you first. Which means in most cases it's too late to do anything. You cannot just shoot anyone with stand-your ground.  Threat needs to be real.  There is huge legal difference in this case.
    1