Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Cop Points Gun at 14-Year-Old Boy Playing on Balcony, 'Accidentally' Shoots Him" video.

  1. Anyone who has been trained with usage of guns knows that they should never point anyone with gun, even when the safety is on. This is the fucking first thing they teach in army before they give you a gun. Either cops are total retards in your country or they haven't been even educated how to use gun. But same time cops fear more in America because there are lot of criminals there and people tend to be violent in there anyway. Thanks for the fact that you guys have low education. PS: Pistols are very inaccurate, cop really needed to aim in order to even hit the kid. I suspect this is obvious murder case.
    3
  2. ***** I don't think that anyone is arguing against getting training before buying the gun. Nor should be against background checks. But there are people who advocate total gun ban, and this seems to be the case of David's channel. Since they are crying every gun incident that happens. Weirdly enough all of them are accidents. Gun accidents can't happen if no one owns them. But they can happen even in trained hands. Personally I don't give a shit are guns illegal or not for the same ground I don't give a shit is marijuana illegal or not. I just happen to realize that only one who benefits from banning are criminal organizations.
    1
  3. bisquitnspanky See my point? It's easy to say "no we don't want total ban" while in fact some people want total ban. And it's easy to say "everyone are okay with some rules" when there is someone who doesn't want any rule at all. My point stands and you did just prove it. "On the other hand, there simply is no movement in existence in the US to ban guns outright. None." whatever people have mobilized to go against all guns is different from do they exists. The fact that in Japan there is total ban already proves that there are people who think that guns should be banned.
    1
  4. bisquitnspanky Of course they are spending millions if they whole lively hood is depending on it. They would be retards for not trying to sell as much as possible. Those random individuals can group up anytime and try to make their demands come true, it's irrelevant if they haven't done it yet in America. Point is they exists and every video david makes implies that is how it should be done.
    1
  5. bisquitnspanky Why are you bringing religion here? I fucking atheists anyway. Oh wait you're trying to poison the well in here. Bit too obvious and proves that you're dishonest person. " Hope you can sleep while trembling in fear about what David Pakman thinks. " Why would I fear what he thinks? You make no sense in here. "BTW I've never once heard David or anyone else on his show suggest an all out ban. " They are literally making statement about every gun incident that happens in country. No matter how small the gun is. Then they talk about how nothing would've happened if that gun didn't exists. In some of these cases they were just originally people who would've had license for gun anyway. They just had accident. Yes they clearly imply with their videos that gun should be banned. You don't need to say something directly. The way they show their news and talk about them points it out. In fact one of the examples how some people indirectly point their opinions can be seen in Hitler before he got in power. There is a reason why in Europe we are very careful against hate speech, or speech which is between the gray area.
    1
  6. bisquitnspanky Talk about ad hominems when your whole reply back to my rebuttal toward you was huge ad hominem. In fact your comment proves how little you know about politics and history of mankind. How come I can't use nazies subtlety as example of David being subtle about his position over guns? You literally are too stupid to even be allowed to comment.
    1
  7. bisquitnspanky It was by very definition ad hominem what you said. You totally dismissed everything I said based on your opinion about me. You didn't even address my points.
    1
  8. bisquitnspanky I did counter everyones claims. I'm sorry but not everyone accept everything people say to them blindly. None of you did successfully refute my counter arguments. And the fact that you still keep talking even though I used your very own logic against you is just hilarious. "But criminals can just buy swat suits and pretend to be cops" So fucking hilarious when you didn't even consider criminals wearing cop uniforms and asking him to come out nicely xD Oh best of all. nice ad hominem again :P
    1
  9. bisquitnspanky How did you even end up with conclusion of dictatorship here? Did I tell any orders here? Nope, did I say that you should shut up? Nope. so in other words this is bad attempt from you to try to form insult. Even though ironically dictator word would fit you perfectly here. Not to mention your whole comment is crazy as fuck. When was last time you took your meds? Take contact to local Shrink. You really look like you have issues even in real life. PS: I mixed you up with another idiot who thinks that cops should just kindly knock the door and wait for criminal to come out.
    1
  10. bisquitnspanky You do realize that you already lost this debate when you decided to act like that?
    1
  11. bisquitnspanky http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/debate ": a discussion between people in which they express different opinions about something" You sir just proved how idiotic you are if you really didn't comprehend that this was debate the moment you decided to discuss about your opinions.
    1
  12. bisquitnspanky Good that you admit it.
    1