Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Obvious Cheating On Coin Toss In Iowa Caucus" video.

  1. and don't touch it until the loser of the coin toss have accepted the results.
    24
  2.  @smode983  saw it, it is pure insanity. Even if there is no cheating, it is pure insanity.
    2
  3.  @Cpen54  the republicans are probably worse. They are just as shitty, but more capable.
    2
  4. if killing Franz Ferdinand could lead to a world war, this "coin toss" could kill democracy.
    1
  5. the probability of a specific outcome (such as 6 out of 6 going Hillary's way) for 6 coin tosses is one in 64, so roughly 1.5% probability. Well outside the expected outcome if there was no bias.
    1
  6. If you have a coin toss in the rules, the rules should state how the coin toss should be made (i.e. describe how it is done correctly to be a valid random outcome generator).
    1
  7. That guy bought a "home magic box kit" and thought he would be savvy enough to get away with cheating.
    1
  8.  Texas Outlaw  well, you can't know how honest the vote counting was, you only know the official results. Corruption is more than just who is elected as well, it is about what happens in office.
    1
  9.  Texas Outlaw  that is not what I am saying and you didn't actually address what I wrote. If you want to be objective, actually read and genuinely try to understand what I wrote. If you think what I wrote was stupid, look up and apply "the principle of charity" and think again.
    1
  10.  Texas Outlaw  my reply was to Patrick Henry, who wrote: "If you don't think the republicans are just as corrupt you dont understand the nature of the beast" in his reply to Tim Othy who wrote: "Says “this is the Democracy we need to save.” ...No, those are the Democrats we need to kick out of the process." They were both speaking in more general terms than just electing people. Given your reply to Patrick Henry regarding being bought by the DNC, I don't think you write with objectivity but instead emotion.
    1
  11.  Texas Outlaw  this discussion is not just about who the party nominates. As soon as you can understand that you will better understand this discussion. You don't know if they counted the votes honestly as well, how could you? You trust that they did, but knowing and trusting are two different things.
    1
  12.  Texas Outlaw  you are not correcting us. You need to look up "the principle of charity" again and really try hard to apply it. Exhibit a: I didn't say "they probably all do it", that is your biased interpretation.
    1
  13.  Texas Outlaw  there is a question of magnitude. Exactly how many votes did they cheat Bernie on? There is a limit to how much you can cheat before it becomes too obvious to be able get away with. So if someone is too far ahead, you can't cheat them secretly enough.
    1