Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "New Yorker Staff Writer: How The Pentagon WOKE UP To UFO Phenomenon" video.

thunderf00t if you want to waste time, Mick West if you want to be efficient :D.
3
nothing is more exciting than out of focus videos of airplanes that people think is aliens/UFOs.
3
@RobertFalconer1967 I did and it was honestly trash.
2
@RobertFalconer1967 why wouldn't it be trash? It is filled with nonsense. Didn't you spot the nonsense?
1
@RobertFalconer1967 "I'm waiting for you to be specific." I didn't take notes and I am not going to watch it again. In general, I'd say they trick the watcher by first presenting ordinary things said as something extraordinary, and then jumps to extraordinary conclusions. It is in no way an honest look at "the phenomena", and that makes it trash.
1
@RobertFalconer1967 Supposition? I explained why the "documentary" is trash. That really has nothing to do with what unexplained events there are or not, the "doc" is trash, and I never claimed anything more or less. Out of curiosity, when you watched it, how did you make sure that you weren't fooled by dishonest tactics?
1
@RobertFalconer1967 when you say "Meanwhile, the government is openly admitting these things are real, and that they don't know what they are." What exact quote are you thinking about?
1
@truthsayer1356 "... there's still this really crazy phenomenon that no one can explain. Like the Pentagon videos where even the pilots are amazed by the flight capabilities of these things." Which videos are you referring to?
1
@truthsayer1356 those videos weren't very impressive, people have explained them reasonably enough to comfortably rule out anything extraordinary.
1
@RobertFalconer1967 "Who do you mean by "people?" Folks on YouTube? " Sure, they can be as good as anyone. "The Pentagon themselves have publicly stated that the videos are real and that the objects are unidentified." Doesn't mean much, just indicated that there isn't 100% knowledge about what is seen. If I hear a loud noise down the street, I might not know for sure what it is, but I can be quite confident it ain't something extraordinary.
1
@truthsayer1356 what do you mean with "The Pentagon couldn't explain what they were."? Do you just mean they are not 100% sure what they were or that they have absolutely no clue at all? Yes I have watched them, as an example I think Mick West does a good job explaining them.
1
@RobertFalconer1967 did I hurt your feelings?
1
@RobertFalconer1967 well, you seem upset anyway.
1
@truthsayer1356 "The Pentagon confirmed that they could not identify what their pilots saw." Which means nothing, honestly. "The pilots have rejected his explanations for what they saw." Saw? Again? I thought we were talking about the videos? Did they reject his analysis of the videos? If so, why? "One instance they were tracking something off the coastline for over an hour (definitely not a balloon)." Are you specifically talking about the "go fast" event? "I just think everyone should keep an open mind as disclosure is supposed to happen soon." And everyone should be extremely skeptical regarding extraordinary claims. "Whether it's unidentified new technology or extraterrestrial." You forgot the option "something completely normal". "Should check out Lue Elizondo's show 'Unidentified' on History" Could make for a good laugh, these things are usually hilariously bad.
1
@truthsayer1356 "He never tries to explain the impossible flight patterns these things display! (90 degree turns, incredible speeds and acceleration, etc.)" Given that we are talking about the three specific videos, which specific movement in which specific video do you think West hasn't addressed? I saw the video of him explaining the movement (i.e. no change of movement) in the "FLIR" video so I wonder if you just missed it, there are a lot to address about the videos. "All of the resources of the Pentagon couldn't identify them." That is beside the point as it is a question about semantics. "Skepticism is always good to have but you don't seem to want to listen to anything that doesn't support your own opinion." I'm listening, so please be specific what about these three videos you think West failed to address. "Talking about someone who has spent his entire career proving that there is unexplained phenomenon around the world ..." It would be astonishing if there were no such events as it would be insane to expect us to understand absolutely everything all the time.
1
@kevincrady2831 I think people misinterpret what the military says. When they say "We don't know", they mean it literally. They might be confident it is an airplane, but they don't know. It is not a big thing to "admit" that you see a UFO/UAP, the only thing that means is that they are not 100% sure what they have seen, even if they strongly suspect it is an airplane. I don't see any downside for the military allowing such talk going on. What is the worst thing that could happen, their budget increases?
1
@kevincrady2831 "If anything, it's a good reason to cut their budgets." You may think it is a good reason, but do you honestly think it is an actual reason for those who decide? No, of course not. All this can do is increase their budget. "If there really are unknown craft that are able to accelerate from zero to supersonic in a fraction of a second, make no sonic booms, fly straight into water, etc., then no budget increase we could offer will do any good." It is not about that, it is about increasing support for the military among the population. "Either way, this ought to be a giant scandal. UFO's are the OG conspiracy theory." It really isn't. The military is inherently secretive, and sometimes they are open. It is not a bigger deal than that.
1
@deer105 shouldn't be too surprising though.
1
@deer105 then I have to ask, do you think all jet fighters know more then me about absolutely everything in the world?
1
@deer105 eye witness accounts are always unreliable, and scientifically speaking completely uninteresting. On top of that, if you listen to how they react to seeing what we have seen in the recent videos (like Gofast, Gimbal, Flir etc.), you'll notice that they don't seem to be very good at interpreting what they see. Properly analyzing these videos makes it obvious that there are reasonable non-extraordinary explanations. Not sure why you are so confident that it is absolutely impossible for Gimbal and Flir to be airplanes.
1
it would be interesting if they would dive into the debunking of all this bs.
1