Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Controversial Dr. Peter McCullough Tells Joe Rogan That Lack Of Covid Treatments DELIBERATE" video.

@CaliMeatWagon all yt-users are not treated the same. My comments have been hidden for spelling out TDS, while others haven't.
2
@Gr8flGrrl more like how the argument was framed. If a person says "many citations" instead of "good citations" as an example.
2
@mstangfiveo it is never needed to use wiki as a source, as if you want to use anything they write, just use the source they used.
2
Wikipedia do cite their sources though, so it is generally more reliable than MSM :P.
1
wikipedia cites its sources. Ryan didn't say sources are bad, he pointed out that it is a tactic by those who want to peddle misinformation to use a lot of sources to make it too much work to be fact checked.
1
@AgentMeowMeow sure, but where do you get an unbiased collection of information about people? :D As far as I know, there is no such thing, so the whole good/bad dichotomy seems incorrect and should rather be about better/worse. As a hypothetical, if I want to quickly inform myself about let's say the leader or Kyrgyzstan (whomever it is :P), how should I go about that?
1
how do you know how accurate it is in general?
1
@SoloRenegade "wikipedia hasn't been an acceptable source in school work at least since the early 2000s" It never was accepted. It has improved a lot though, so much that I trust it as much as anything.
1
@sadiemakesmesmile the goal is always to go for the original source, right? That means that no matter how good Wikipedia is, you shouldn't accept it. Also, as Wikipedia is as good as it is, it would just create lazy students to accept it.
1
do you agree that there is a difference between "accurate" and "pretty accurate"? Not a quantifiable difference, but a significant one when it comes to how we are to interpret what he said.
1