Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Illegal Immigration: It's About Power | 5 Minute Video" video.

@ReiEmeraldTakedo tangent?
1
@ReiEmeraldTakedo You: Seems like a tangent to me. Me: tangent? You: Not in the slightest. Me: ???
1
@ReiEmeraldTakedo I was asking why you think corbin mcnabb's original comment was a tangent. It certainly did not seem like "an abrupt change of course" to me, if you looked at the video and read Tim Biagen's comment.
1
@ReiEmeraldTakedo the video doesn't have to substantiate the claim, it just have to build on the premise. You can argue about the premise if you like, which both Tim and Corbin does. So there is nothing tangential about it. I am honestly really confused about what you want to accomplish here.
1
@ReiEmeraldTakedo read again. I said "build on the premise", not "build a premise" as you said. Vast difference. What you explained is arguing the premise. The thing is that prager U doesn't say everyone will vote dem though right? If they do, PLEASE QUOTE and provide time stamp! So Tim isn't contradicting anything by saying that he won't vote dem. Tims comment is essentially utterly stupid, and so is all of yours. "Dropping in to make a declarative statement about whether or not the Dems rely on immigrant votes seems tangental to whether or not Tim is going to vote Dem, especially when he's already stated he won't be." You have gotten it all backwards. Tim is responding to a declarative statement about whether or not the Dems rely on immigrant votes. There is nothing tangential here. Again, what are you trying to accomplish here? I really can't understand, and boy am I trying. Forget about the most idiotic discussion about the definition of a tangent or what this comment or that comment is about. What do you want to accomplish here? I am listening.
1
the ciimate denier video is a better example :)
1