General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

snuffeldjuret
Primal Space
comments

Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Primal Space" channel.

@obsidianstatue you truly got big balls for defending China regarding Hong Kong. It makes me dismiss absolutely everything you say.
24
@obsidianstatue when did I say that you said that you can't have a different opinion on hong kong? You are clearly the one who needs to learn how to read.
13
@obsidianstatue I'm sorry but that does not make sense.
13
regarding spacex starship infrastructure you mean? Yes, very much so :).
9
must be exciting to be close to hopefully the best rocket launches ever, at least taken out of context (prolly tough to beat Apollo 11 launch when context is taken into account)
6
@Jordan-lr4bi Thuderf00t also made fun of the helicopter that is on its way to Mars right now, so don't hold him in too high of regard.
4
it is generally not a good idea to launch over land, in case of bad thing happening. Very few launch sites launch over land, and when they do they do over desolate areas.
4
also, they are still looking at launching from a converted oil rig, but work on that is less prioritized.
4
@ganeshdas1493 I have, that is how I found out it was bs.
4
@ganeshdas1493 this is actual information: https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/workforce-data
4
@adamhendrickson512 "Just Google the Great Bengal Famine" I did: "An estimated 2.1–3 million, out of a population of 60.3 million, died of starvation, malaria, and other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions and lack of health care" That is nothing in comparison to the Holocaust, which made the Jewish population go from 17 to 11 million people.
4
what? That is not the case at all, FAA only regulates American space launches.
4
@fromfareast3070 dismissed is not the same thing as saying it is false. Keep that in mind.
4
"Fun Fact Is most of the engineers in 'NASA' are also Indians" I can't believe you Indians are so gullible that you believe this :P.
3
that always happens. NIMBY is an expression with an abbreviation for a reason.
3
that is a straight up lie.
3
B Jiang it is not that I don't know about the association fallacy, his reply simply made no sense.
3
what did they do?
2
@sushruthkashyap a lot of things are said without it being true.
2
@sushruthkashyap this https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/workforce-data officially disputes that claim.
2
it really should be everything space related. Nothing is ever on time here/there.
2
install a plugin for your browser and you'll manage a while longer.
2
@tomwatts703 well, Starship has flown, just not that high.
2
@akinemainunangugel9650 what makes you think everything else is true but manned landing on the moon? You said the tech was lost, but you accept the Saturn V flew, and flew around the moon unmanned? You wishing it was true and believing it is true are two different things. You convince yourself it isn't true for whatever reason, and then look at everything from that perspective. " if the first human step on the moon is armstrong who put the camera before he do the step?" Are you seriously thinking this is a slam dunk question? I'll quote: "They simply mounted a camera on the Descent Stage of the Lunar Module and pointed it at the steps."
2
it cost a lot of money, unless I recall incorrectly they had an airplane take that footage (if I do, it ought to be an autonomous boat). They took that footage when they needed the information to perfect the procedure, which they don't need anymore so they don't spend money on it. They are improving the onboard camera though, these days the feed is continuous more often than not.
2
@xFirstAidx "Again, the whole point is to demonstrate the landing ability of the crafts." That is not the whole point. They show what they can of the footage they already capture for their own sake, without giving away too juicy details to competitors. "They are filming the landings of the crafts from multiple angles accurately, considering they release the footage to the public days later." What footage are you talking about? I haven't seen such footage from any recent launch. Give an actual example of this. "Someone could idle in a helicopter, and live stream the landing through a phone on YouTube or Facebook for free." But what does the helicopter cost to get out there? That is the cost I am talking about. "They make it so easy for conspiracy theorist." Does anyone really care what conspiracy theorists think? It is a fools errand to spend money in the attempt to convince space related conspiracy theorists about what is real. "Every time." It seems they have managed to improve the situation a bit, many booster landings have not had their feed cut out recently. I presume you haven't watched any of the recent landings? If you want to have a look at them, just open the streamed videos from spacex's yt-channel and jump to around mission time 8:30 or so, that is usually when the landing takes place. Here is the latest one: https://youtu.be/KU6KogxG5BE?t=1513
2
@liambenn1214 I was once accused of being Indian because I knew about ISRO lol :P.
2
@nurphurecarnium it is kind of true though...
2
different styles of landing and taking off, thus he invented it.
1
@criticalhard if the houses have very low value, 3x that value isn't that great if the houses really are exactly what the owner wants.
1
@ericpowell7547 you compare them to show how different they are. That is the purpose.
1
@avg_user-dd2yb what is the evidence for that?
1
Peter Aremone so since they had other measures to deal with the situation, isn't that evidence for them not killing them?
1
@EragonShadowSlasher so you think the us assassinates scientists in all countries they compete with? :P You don't think it is more likely another country is doing it? Are no other country competing with India?
1
@EragonShadowSlasher given that they all do it, why don't they do it even more?
1
@EragonShadowSlasher I'm Swedish, so I have no stakes in this, all I care about is the truth. So if they all do it, why don't they do it even more you think?
1
@EragonShadowSlasher but it doesn't make sense only a few are able to get assassinated. Additionally, this fairy tale has zero evidence. From what I have seen in this comment section, Indians love believing things without evidence. That is probably what killed the scientists LOL.
1
@EragonShadowSlasher I seem to understand it better as I can argue my point, something you can't.
1
@thepodcastpoint9653 what makes you think CIA did that instead of anyone else? Because CIA talked about it? If they did it, wouldn't it have been better for them to be quiet about it? You talk about it as if it is an established fact, when it is not. That does not make me confident in your dedication to the truth.
1
@thepodcastpoint9653 so you choose to believe things based on circumstantial evidence, great. Why wouldn't you think it was Pakistan? Since it was such a crude method, no finesse what so ever you could expect from the CIA?
1
@akhilvyas5388 none of you here have any idea of what you are talking about. Btw, we have nuclear power here in Sweden, in case you didn't know....................
1
@xenonspeaks7018 you are just speculating.
1
@xenonspeaks7018 and I am the king of Spain, this is the truth.
1
@xenonspeaks7018 yea I know I didn't kill him :P. If you are going to make wild accusations based on circumstantial evidence, at best, I'm gonna call you out.
1
@kunal_gaud so? What is your point?
1
@KALIYANZ Blogs not sure what that has to do with what I wrote though...
1
@mandeep_thakur for your information, the leap from that to CIA assassinations involving killing many civilians is huge. Why would the U.S: help India anyway? How would that help the world?
1
@mandeep_thakur the fewer countries with icbm nuclear weapons the better. That is why. Especially a country that seems to be filled with super paranoid people who can't differentiate between facts and unsubstantiated rumors. Do you think the U.S. is the only country in the world with these wishes? I seem to recall there being some disputes between India and China for instance... maybe point your finger towards them, perhaps? Why not?
1
@mandeep_thakur so you agree with me, great. Then why are you so upset and talk conspiracy theories?
1
@25thMax 2003 yea I read some and there is absolutely nothing that points fingers at CIA. All you have is this quote "“In it, Crowley is quoted as saying that the Indian victory in the 1965 India-Pakistan war made America uncomfortable, and that it viewed with concern the emergence of India as a nuclear power...." which doesn't mean bleep. "36% of scientists at NASA are Indians: Govt survey" Is absolute pure garbage. On NASA website you can read that "Other than extremely rare exceptions, you must be a U.S. citizen in order to work for NASA as a civil service employee." As one of your links said: "When you are in one of three neighboring nuclear powers like Iran, Pakistan and India, each struggling to achieve martial rivalry over the other two ..." It seems like you should point fingers towards Pakistan and Iran, not The US. I mean, if you trust your sources, that is ;).
1
@25thMax 2003 "but the CIA one is not to be made public only known by ISRO and DRDO scientist it was wrong about making it public." What are you talking about? Also, why are you and (almost) everyone else here so reluctant to talk about this idea: "When you are in one of three neighboring nuclear powers like Iran, Pakistan and India, each struggling to achieve martial rivalry over the other two ..."?
1
@EragonShadowSlasher hehe yea, it is as if the U.S. isn't really involved ;).
1
@EragonShadowSlasher ergo CIA killed Indian scientists?
1
@EragonShadowSlasher don't be conspiratorial. The evidence presented by everyone here is pathetic. "And their intelligence agencies will do whatever it takes to fulfill their national objectives." is an exaggeration and you know it. Do better.
1
@thepodcastpoint9653 what you believe is irrelevant really.
1
@radhakrishna-fv6dt "... but u can't deny the fact that there is a chance that cia did this!" Did I do that? I don't recall doing that, but please quote me if i did. Of course you can't say they didn't do it unless there is unquestionable evidence someone else did. My point is that it is ludicrous to assume or claim the U.S. did it (which so, so many do here in this thread and comment section) when there are other, more motivated, actors.
1
@radhakrishna-fv6dt "US doesn't have any less motivation than other countries!" and "... if they did kill the scientist they would have been caught! cause they are not that much capable as CIA !" Just looks like uninformed speculation from your part. To me, making a plane crash (if that's the one we are talking about) lacks any finesse, certainly sounds like something Iran or Pakistan would do. Or you know, it could just have been an accident ;). You see, you have to back up your argument with something substantial to be convincing, otherwise it just looks like you are taking advantage of a situation to throw shade at an arbitrary chosen direction.
1
@iscifion7122 "So the solution was. Kill the lead scientist." Still, this is your speculation. Be honest about that.
1
@iscifion7122 how does that question make sense?
1
@iscifion7122 What did I write that makes you think it is even remotely possible that I think the world is a utopia?
1
@danydash316 ergo USA killed an Indian scientist? Is that what you are trying to say?
1
@danydash316 do you think he should have gotten a more severe punishment? Surely you can understand the desire to not send a citizen away to another country for prosecution?
1
@samusam5853 oh, we are up to "many" now? XD. You must be furious people only talk about one!
1
@asi2765 Do you dispute that "Misunderstanding between Geneva Airport and the pilot about the aircraft position near the mountain is the official reason of the crash."? All in all though, if you align with Russia in the cold war, I think you deserve it if CIA did it :P.
1
@asi2765 "Nice of you to come in front of the curtain." What is that even supposed to mean? What made you think I could even possibly be pro-Russia? Call it what you want, it is what it is. Haha, next up I am expecting Germans coming in here, complaining about how the U.S. and Russia stole their scientist, setting them back I don't know how many decades. Oh how they would complain XD. Do you get my point? :D
1
@avishekmondal4836 "Scientists" Plural s? That is a rare claim, even in this thread. Are you mad at your bretheren who only claim there was one? I have only seen evidence presented for one, and that is very weak evidence mind you. Not even remotely as comparable to today, which is Israel btw, not the U.S.
1
@avishekmondal4836 "Yes, CIA killed 200 other innocent passengers just to kill 1 Indian Nuclear Scientist." Does the Indian government make this claim? Last I heard, the official story is accidents. They do happen, you know.
1
@avishekmondal4836 "In comments section of other videos too" Yeah I'd like you to present evidence on that one haha. Unless you think it is hate propaganda to point out that NASA does not consist of 37% Indians :P. "... wont stop India from developing. Just watch and suffer. Wish you a long life so that you see for yourself what this country has to achieve." Quite the opposite (I was once accused for being an Indian masquerading as a Swede just because I praised ISRO), but that is not what this is about. This is about the truth and how confident we can be in us understanding it based on evidence. This whole hate thing is something you just made up in your head, which seems common in comment sections like this. A lot of patriotism over truth and rationality.
1
@mrnobody9473 "the only evidence we have was when our scientist Homi bhaba was killed by CIA" But that is not evidence, that is a rumor. I mean, is this even the official stance of the India government?
1
@sambin8481 "But before jumping the gun" I am not jumping any gun, the gun jumpers are those who say it as if it is a fact.
1
@mrnobody9473 "many were saying that it was CIA" yeah but that doesn't make it evidence or true. Do you know that many people say that the democrats stole the election from Trump, do you believe that as well? I mean, many people are saying it!
1
@mrnobody9473 "I have not said that it is CIA confirmed" Mate, you literally did when you wrote: "our scientist Homi bhaba was killed by CIA in bomb blast on his plane"
1
@mrnobody9473 I was quoting your first comment mate. "our scientist Homi bhaba was killed by CIA in bomb blast on his plane" is from your first comment, which does indeed contradict what you later said "I have not said that it is CIA confirmed". Maybe you are commenting from multiple accounts?
1
swapnil katkar lol, you are that person who is proud over beating up a guy even though you were in a group of 8 against him. Pathetic.
1
@wrwhiteal "... most viewers don’t bother to downvote because they don’t show anyway. " Is this your feeling or do you have any actual solid empirical evidence? Something is still better than nothing, you can consider the new dislike landscape and act accordingly, but only if you have a plugin showing the number of dislikes.
1
@tomwatts703 "a prototype has flown to 10km" 5 prototypes flew that high. "only a tenth of the distance to actual space, with no crew or cargo" But they flew, and as I said "just not that high." "that is nowhere near enough to qualify it as a success." Not sure what "it" is that you are referring to here. "At least the Orion capsule has actually made it above the Karman Line." That was an odd tangent. So has Crew Dragon, so I wonder what point you are trying to make here.
1
@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 you can say that about absolutely everything. It hasn't happened until it has happened, what a brilliant comment...
1
@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 but you are here attacking SpaceX, not SpaceX fanbois.
1
@oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 you are erratic, so it is difficult to take you seriously.
1
do you believe in the second, and third etc.?
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 but first was live, and you don't believe that one either? So you are dishonest in your standards mate.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 "for me they didn't make it live again because it will be noticed coz the viewing technology is evolving" But you realize the second landing was in the same year, 1969, right? How much had the viewing technology advanced at that point? Why didn't they fake the footage again, to convince even more people? If they faked it once, it'd be a piece of cake to fake it again, right? If you think it was fake back then, why would you change your opinion if they landed now? Why wouldn't you just call the footage fake, like all other flat earthers etc?
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 that does not answer my questions.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 how did the technology evolve in 5 months? From mid 69 to late 69? "but the critics on the same year voice it out" Who did? All this nonsense started much later. Not even Russia disputed this, who were in the same race.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 "you didn't know there is a critics??? oh ok" Name one. If you say there are, without naming one single person, why should I believe you? If you don't believe in the moon landing, despite massive amounts of evidence, why should I believe you, with zero evidence? "there is always a critics and supporters everytime there is a record or show " But if there is always critics, you can't use the existence of critics as evidence against it actually happening, lol. Your logic is way out of whack dude.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 "whatever... naming people I don't know personally is not my thing" but claiming things without evidence is, I see. Which is so, so ironic, isn't it? "there is no evidence that the first human on the moon is real" do you confuse evidence with proof? There is tons of evidence. This is all evidence: https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/12/12/heres-your-proof-that-we-landed-on-the-moon-steph-curry/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings and for you to say it doesn't exist only shows your ignorance of the situation.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 "they believe it's true so they imagine it is" Have you ever thought that you refuse to see the evidence for what it is because you believe it is not true to begin with? The arguments you present are so inconsistent that it does not hold up to scrutiny, and you even claimed there were no evidence yet you disputed none of the evidence I just showed you. In the greater context, do you believe in everything about space flight, except the human moon landings? "forbes is made by the same country, so ¯\_(⊙_ʖ⊙)_/¯" Again, this is not an argument as you dismiss evidence from other countries as well.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 you are in denial mate, what you want and what you think you want doesn't always align. You have made zero effort in understanding the evidence for the manned moon landing, but you take any so called evidence against it at face value, without any critical thinking. Actions speak louder than words, and your actions are quite loud and your words are meaningless.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 yes, the relevant actions, like dismissing evidence on baseless grounds, and accepting evidence on baseless grounds. You are inconsistent in how you treat evidence, and you are very obvious about it.
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 no you dismiss on baseless grounds as you do not treat all evidence the same. I don't believe, I assess evidence in the fairest manner I can and make a judgement call on the likelihood of the different possibilities. My problem is not with your outcome, but how you arrive to it. So regarding the evidence of the footage of Neil stepping down on the Moon, what did you think of my answer to your question " if the first human step on the moon is armstrong who put the camera before he do the step?"?
1
@akinemainunangugel9650 hm, I have no idea what you are trying to say about the Apollo 11 cam. I think you have to be more elaborate in your description of your issue with it.
1
I'm confused, I thought Team Cocoa won over Team Boca Chica, but they chose Boca Chica's location for obvious reasons.
1
do you know which team won? Don't use this video as a source.
1
why?
1
@thebookofwisdom2147 because neutrality is sometimes immoral.
1
from what I have been able to find, it seems closer to 500k than 250k for Bezos. Branson seems closer to 250k.
1
@iamarokotmanson *most fans suck
1
84km could be though :)
1
@tartiflett5248 according to Karman, it is.
1
@ManicMovesDrowsyDreams 100 km is arbitrary, you might as well choose 101 km. 100 km is not based on anything "real", it is based on us having 10 fingers :P.
1
@xFirstAidx while I wait for you references, I'll just point out that: "The Falcon 9’s first stage will target a landing on SpaceX’s drone ship “Just Read the Instructions” in the Atlantic Ocean nearly 400 miles (630 kilometers) northeast of Cape Canaveral." https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/06/03/timeline-for-falcon-9-launch-with-starlink-satellites/ "As a general rule, helicopters usually fly around 2.5 to 5 hours before they have to stop and refuel. This translates to a distance of roughly 250 miles ... Many helicopters with no reserve are able to fly at 5000 feet for nearly 600 miles at a time." https://www.aircraftcompare.com/blog/how-far-can-helicopters-fly/ Adding on to the cost, what is the added risk to life? Looking at this tweet though: https://twitter.com/spacex/status/718628506230370308 It seems it was a chase plane they used, not helicopter. Chase plane was also used for the splash down of the Crew Dragon capsule recently iirc.
1
@xFirstAidx speaking of all this, cool footage of the faring capture from this week's launch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTH3mq7SsK4 And again uninterrupted footage of the landing: https://youtu.be/jTMJK7wb0rM?t=1414
1
@M.Y.B.A-p4d do you know how big starship is? What the "faring" volume is?
1
was that a reference to something specific? :)
1
the only thing keeping any space company alive is government handouts.
1
@SylviaRustyFae other companies get people killed all the time, do you care?
1
Alex Mercer so?
1
@crystalball020 not necessarily. Many times it can be advantageous to appear as if you care if there is a desire from others that you do care.
1
@Rahul don't confuse bathe and shower. People rarely bathe, but shower very often.
1
you're messing me up with that "RGV-music" :D.
1
if you compare the quantity of something between a country of 1 billion people to one with 10 million, you have already lost.
1
@bd8594 lol, of course technology is about quantity regarding the comparison you make. Don't be an idiot. Who is mocking China's space program?
1
@bd8594 dude, you even admitted to it yourself with your "... even the combined EU is not a space powerhouse." comment. Now, can the straight A student answer the apparently really difficult question "Who is mocking China's space program"?
1
BVZ I get a feeling that this talk about 9 year olds and 19 year olds is a reference to pewdiepie :P.
1
@Vinay Nair you have fallen victim to fake news mate. Don't believe everything you read. https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/workforce-data/
1
it was healthy competition because the end result was always going to be the same thing, they continue to develop Boca Chica based on the winning team's design. As I understand it, Cocoa did win over Boca Chica.
1
was going to say the same, so I'll just comment here instead :).
1
it doesn't matter how any times you guys repeat that, it is still not true.
1
anyone who wants to watch those events :P.
1
hehe yea, and it is quite pathetic. Just look at how many times the "NASA 34percent (less or more) scientist is Indian" lie is repeated here :P.
1
@yunidhkumar5571 I am not jealous over people who building their identity based on a lie, specifically the "NASA 34percent (less or more) scientist is Indian" lie. I mean, you do not believe that one, right?
1
@oracle4127 but we are not talking about Indian Americans here, we are talking about Indians. I am sure your brain is big enough to understand the difference.
1
@oracle4127 American Indians refers to Native Americans. No need to face palm yourself when you display your ignorance, we see it anyway ;).
1
does it matter if people think it is a con? The good thing with people being vocal about the conspiracy's they believe we know who we can't trust.
1
@fromfareast3070 do you honestly believe they would tell the truth?
1
@fromfareast3070 are you saying that there is no evidence for them not being 100% honest? There is no presumption of guilt, don't try to play the straw man game with me.
1