Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "The Tesla Bot: BUSTED!" video.

  1.  @stylis666  with that last "Idiots like you?" you really proved my point even though I was mostly joking, that is impressive! Good job mate :).
    4
  2. "they think they're smarter than they actually are" I think you are referring to the TF audience :).
    3
  3.  @hbtm2951  then you haven't seen the TF audience enough :).
    3
  4. you are way to reasonable to be found in the TF comment section :P.
    3
  5.  @fask69  Artemis and Dear Moon are two different things.
    2
  6. bsers are usually good speakers...
    2
  7.  @fask69  I think so too, but they have to really nail the Starship landing method.
    1
  8. what specifically did he say about the "1-year release date"?
    1
  9.  @tjnucnuc  I thought he was talking about a prototype?
    1
  10.  @philip_bray  "He hasn't accomplished anything with space travel yet." Ah the typical TF fanboi.
    1
  11.  @philip_bray  "a certain someone." I don't think you know very much about Musk, he rarely if ever takes credit for anything. He always attributes it to his teams. "By the way partially reusing a rocket is only half of the way there." It is still achieving something no one has ever done.
    1
  12.  @philip_bray  "If I complete half of my days work I didn't achieve my goal. Sure he achieved half of his goal I'll correct my statement to he has achieved half of what he wanted. Sorry if that upset you." That it the stupidest thing I have seen in this comment section. If a person aims to break the world record in the Olympics, it would be idiotic to say winning the gold medal is meaningless just because the person aimed high. "I really can't be bothered to argue if you believe in what he says ..." That is not what we are talking about, we are talking about what SpaceX have achieved so far.
    1
  13.  @philip_bray  you are shifting the goalpost so much I am not sure you even remember what you previously said.
    1
  14.  @hbtm2951  I didn't, but now I did just so that you can see I wasn't the initial one. Again, you prove to me that you are not as smart as you think :).
    1
  15.  @kyushirokun  ehm, what is your issue with that? Someone clearly showed an example of inflated sense of their own brilliance.
    1
  16.  @hbtm2951  who said you cared about looking smart? I just mentioned that you were wrong. Was I wrong to think that you genuinely though I liked my own comments?
    1
  17.  @kyushirokun  "Just laughing at the lack of self awareness." What you perceive as lack of self awareness, which is quite different. "If him calling you an idiot is proving your point, you "jokingly" calling them less smart than they think is not much better." My comment was evidence based, his was only believed to be and thus strengthened the evidence for mine. I am not sure if things can be much more different than that :P. "Also you don't get to claim it was a joke and then say it was your point, but that's a whole other can of worms lol" Have you ever heard that "there's a grain of truth in every joke"? It was a joke with a point, but the joke bit was more about the intentional misunderstanding of OP rather than my statement itself. Not replying to it would leave it as a joke, replying to it with stupidity brings out the truth aspect of it. You are trying to hard here mate, two things can be true at the same time.
    1
  18.  @hbtm2951  what are you trying to accomplish here in this comment section?
    1
  19.  @hbtm2951  I could speculate, but I am more interested in your answer.
    1
  20. isn't solar tiles already a thing?
    1
  21.  @skaruts  mate, why would you assume everyone would watch a TF video? It's just a waste of time. Looking in the comment section is fun though.
    1
  22.  @skaruts  how did you come to that conclusion? (which ironically enough is peak arrogance)
    1
  23.  @skaruts  but watching a TF video does not make a person know a topic, so I think your fixation with watching a TF video is misguided. There are better ways to know things than to watch TF videos. Assuming someone is uninformed because they haven't watched it is a big no-no, so I hope you didn't do that!
    1
  24.  @skaruts  I assumed so, so would you then rephrase this: "if you don't watch the video, then you don't know his arguments, which makes you arrogant if you come here speaking from a position of certainty about something you don't know."?
    1
  25.  @hans-joachimbierwirth4727  "No human rating, no Starship." Pure bs, even if no human ever flies on it, it will be a success. "His new engines have no engineer." Lol, why did you say that? That was just embarrassing to read :P.
    1
  26.  @hans-joachimbierwirth4727  If that is how you react to a reality check, I feel sorry for you.
    1
  27.  @hans-joachimbierwirth4727  Starship is meant to serve more purposes than that though (e.g. sending Starlink satellites into LEO), which is why your statement that "No human rating, no Starship." is so erroneous. Your analogy with the ocean lines would be fitting if it economically made sense to have it cross a small lake, so your analogy fails as well.
    1
  28.  @hans-joachimbierwirth4727  lol, when you start talking about the name, we all know you are grasping at straws. I have no time for your nonsense, goodbye.
    1