Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "SpaceX Starship's 'monumental' test flight, explained | About That" video.

  1. I have to say it again. This video was ridiculously good. Praying to the yt-algorithm gods for it to gain more traction :).
    60
  2. 4:42 absolutely love the production quality of this video and the technical details accuracy, but it was kind of cute how intentionally or not the video sort of insinuated that the rocket went the wrong direction to the Indian ocean :).
    43
  3. you are way, way exaggerating the issue.
    6
  4. and this is combusted methane, so even less bad :).
    4
  5.  @jptrainor  it feels like one of those things chatgpt should be good at. My understanding is that it is less than expected, but I would not bet my life that it is that low. I would call 37 home-years bs but I would not instinctively object to 3750. Now I'm kind of curious what result a manual calculation would give us :).
    4
  6.  @cbdude  my comment was about the direction, not the destination. Don't throw around comments about clapping seals when you are the one making a fool out of yourself. We are past pi day, but it is time for you to eat humble pie.
    2
  7. indeed, but you do get into the problem of, what is a new rocket? Like, falcon 9 that flies today is clearly not the same as the inaugural Falcon 9, but Vostok and Soyuz counts as different rockets?
    1
  8. They didn't fully load it for ift-3 because of that lack of payload. They did for ift-2 though, but that resulted in the we-have-too-much-propellant-so-we-need-to-dump-it-problem. This is quite obvious if you compare the frost on the outside on ift-2 and ift-3. Your attitude does not match your knowledge.
    1
  9.  @cbdude  was that eating noise? XD
    1
  10. if you are annoyed with the star in starship, I can't wait to hear your rant about starliner :P.
    1
  11. how so?
    1