Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Most People Arrested at Protests Aren't Leftist Radicals" video.

most? what is the percentage? 49% would be bad enough.
1
@samfetter2968 didn't they say that 95-97% of the protests were peaceful? Not 99.9999% It is not about violence though, but "leftist radicals".
1
@samfetter2968 they in this case is MSM. "And no matter what percentage it is...it is miles away from what you tried to imply. " Excuse me? I thought you liked facts.... "While the US has long been home to a vibrant protest environment, demonstrations surged to new levels in 2020. Between 24 May and 22 August, ACLED records more than 10,600 demonstration events across the country. Over 10,100 of these — or nearly 95% — involve peaceful protesters. Fewer than 570 — or approximately 5% — involve demonstrators engaging in violence." "Matter of fact a miniscule percentage of protesters are violent." But that is not what this video is about. "And no matter what percentage it is...it is miles away from what you tried to imply. " What do you think I implied? Remember, this video is about "Most People Arrested at Protests Aren't Leftist Radicals"
1
@samfetter2968 "And if your comprehention skills were a bit better you would have realized that while i was talking about number of violent people at protests the ACLED Was talking number of violent events where a small percentage of people attending doing violence. " It is not a question about comprehention skills, I was just going as off-topic as you did. "And yes...this video isn't about that. So why did you bring it up in the first place, only to have it debunked by me?" Huh? You brought up the frequency of violence, not me. "This video is about most people arrested at protests weren't leftist raficals. Correct." So you should interpret my original comment in that context then. You didn't, and now you try to repair that damage by attacking me, which is kind of sad. "And it was correct. As the data shows...most people arrested weren't leftwing radicals." And this is where we come back to my original comment. Most = 50+%, but the thing is that: "49% would be bad enough."
1
@samfetter2968 "No...you made it about the number of violent protesters. That wasn't me." How hilarious are you? What do you think I talk about when I wrote: "most? what is the percentage? 49% would be bad enough." Not violent protesters, which you started talking about in your first reply. Just go back and read so you can stop embarrassing yourself.
1
@samfetter2968 "You tried to imply that it could be still an almost 50%." That is literally the definition of "most". If you have a problem with what the definition of "most" is, I don't think it is me you should run and complain to.
1
@samfetter2968 "i don't remember challenging you on the definition of most, now did i?" "You tried to imply that it could be still an almost 50%." so yeah... Get your head of of your ass.
1
@samfetter2968 it does, as the only thing I said was that using "most" only meant it could mean up to 49%. It is funny to see you sit on your high horse at the same time as you say things like "Sweety..." and "idiot" etc. What do you think you are accomplishing here by behaving like that? :P
1
@samfetter2968 haha no, that was not implied, that was your interpretation. That misinterpretation really opened the floodgates for your sad behavior. You'll never accept that it was a misinterpretation though because you are too emotionally invested in it. Yeah you really accomplish the goal to have no one take anything you say seriously :P. Since I am a bigger man than you, I'll let you have the last word (if you want it) by ending my participation here. Feel free to write anything you need to make you feel good inside.
1
yea and proud boys are just proud boys.
1
@gerri577 white supremacy is an idea as well, and you can talk about white supremacy organized in groups without a group being named "the white supremacists".
1
so every person who say they aren't racist isn't racist them. Got it.
1