Comments by "snuffeldjuret" (@snuffeldjuret) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1.  @blahblahbleh__9046  ideally, the solar panels would absorb all sunlight or reflect away from Earth what it does not absorb though. The surface that is facing the Earth should not get any sunlight to reflect to Earth. Not sure how close to ideal situation they can get though. They have tried out a special coating and last launch they said they will try out something that sounds somewhat similar to your idea, as I understand it.
    1
  2. are you sure?
    1
  3.  @h.cedric8157  "... the show seems to HAVE to comply WAY TOO MUCH with 2021 gender agenda roles that it starts to be painful." I think this is the case for a lot of things, but I really don't see it here. What specific things do you oppose most regarding this in the show?
    1
  4. I would assume so, but I wonder how easy it is if you want to land it more than once.
    1
  5.  @speedsterwinston  no, there was enough in the bigger tank, not in one filled canister. Also, they had enough for 2 people to begin with.
    1
  6. F's in the chat bois.
    1
  7.  @throx  don't "listen" to him. He talks as if he knows everything in the world, but does not (obviously). He over and over said that mechazilla would never, ever, ever, ever look like it does now. You know he talks a lot of bs if I recall his name from many months ago.
    1
  8.  @ottovonottsville476  ? Are you clinically insane? I remember your comments from RGV, you can't hide from them. If you are insane, please tell me and I shall stop laughing, as that would not be kind of me to do.
    1
  9.  @ottovonottsville476  I fetched something for you: During the assembly of the chopstick arms of Mechazilla 5 months ago, where RGV Aerial Photography described pretty much exactly how they would become to be, you wrote: "You guys don't know how WRONG your guesswork is. At least check w a struct engr bf embarrassment. An Iguanadon." "you've got the arms backwards and upside down. Why would they put that little nib on the end of an arm except to keep the fins from slipping off the end? Those ends are finished - no attachment points." "Again with the uninformed opinions. Luckily the internet will eventually kill you all. Figuratively speaking." (that one is hilariously ironic)
    1
  10.  @ottovonottsville476  "Being lucky is not the same as being right." Correct, but being wrong is being wrong, and that is what you were. This is not about RGV, it is about you being wrong, and accepting that you can be wrong, and realizing that even when you are wrong, you act as if you have absolute knowledge and cannot be wrong. That is a fault within you that you should work on. You need to learn the difference between you knowing something and you thinking something.
    1
  11.  @ottovonottsville476  "... my approach was entirely correct." No your approach wasn't entirely correct because even though you knew you didn't have enough info, you still made 100% confident claims about the future, and in the most arrogant fashion I might add. "My previous discussions have no bearing on THIS one." Correct, but if you can't take responsibility for your own part in failed conversations of the past, you can't expect to have good conversations in the future. I don't know how old you are, but it is never to late to learn something new.
    1
  12. 15 mph impact is quite fast, tbh seems quite impressive that it survived for 7 minutes after that!
    1
  13.  @incognitoburrito6020  they obviously don't have perfect reporting, so either you think they are doing better or worse. Do you honestly think they are doing better than reported?
    1
  14. Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos is boring AF.
    1
  15.  @MateusAntonioBittencourt  "What did I said that is irrational?" This: "Of course it does." To my question: "What if two people know the exact same things, but one has a degree. Are you really going to say that one is real one and one is fake?" You put all the weight on an insignificant distinction. That is being irrational.
    1
  16.  @rhover  oh, that sounds like good news. I find it quite enjoyable honestly.
    1
  17. few things are.
    1
  18.  @KnightRanger38  most plausible explanation I've seen so far.
    1
  19. it's hard to overstate my satisfaction.
    1
  20.  @Sir_Uncle_Ned  seems like an odd choice!
    1
  21. sounds similar to being shot or stabbed :D.
    1
  22. 7:20 Scott knew about Polaris Dawn a lot sooner than we did :).
    1
  23.  @Coconut-219  I don't mind spacex getting all that glorious money from a monopoly.
    1
  24. actually makes a lot of sense.
    1
  25. Is there any update to this? Haven't heard anything about it in a long, long time.
    1
  26. indeed XD.
    1
  27. I am kind of curious about your gripes with SpaceX.
    1
  28. Who is this most ban news for?
    1
  29. I have seen that very shape many times before
    1
  30.  @a32k57  that object has been the topic of discussion many times during and after Everyday Astronaut falcon 9 launch watchings. Especially when something goes wrong. Not sure what it is, but I would place my money on ice.
    1
  31.  @OlivierGabin  they say that they loved the actors and would have loved to keep them, and the actors would have loved to stay on the show, but sometime the story has to be prioritized.
    1
  32. allows for the benefit of mass production is what I recall hearing as an argument. And as Scott said, you can have an engine failure without failing the mission. Not sure how easy it would be to do the landing with fewer engines and not sure how the thrust to weight ratio is on the larger ones.
    1
  33. seen the same object in many launches. It becomes a big talking point in the failed landings but ignored during successful landings :P.
    1
  34. sure, but I want the profit to go to SpaceX, not some random company who will do nothing good with the money. Another way of looking at it is that I'd rather give 100 dollars to a friend than 80 dollars to a stranger.
    1
  35. it looks like a thing that always flies by?
    1
  36. 2:06 wow, 36 000 km, that is low!
    1
  37.  @the18thdoctor3  yeah not sure what I was thinking XD
    1
  38. I was just about to post a similar comment :P.
    1
  39.  @hawkdsl  they are not going to launch if they don't think it is safe enough!
    1
  40.  @hawkdsl  so it is not a safety issue then why you would hand your ticket away, your ego is just not strong enough.
    1
  41.  @hawkdsl  so when you said "The richest people in the world will always have the safest equipment.", you didn't really mean it? Surely you agree that Yusaku Maezawa is among the richest in the world, and that he plans to fly on the dear moon mission, right? :P
    1
  42.  @hawkdsl  I fail to see the relevance of the question.
    1
  43.  @hawkdsl  so what is your point?
    1
  44.  @hawkdsl  your statements still don't really makes sense.
    1
  45.  @hawkdsl  you always huff and puff this much when someone points out how you contradicted yourself? :P
    1
  46.  @hawkdsl  I am not trolling, I am trying to figure out if you can be reasoned with or not. If you say "The uber rich people with two invited little people will probably be a safe flight.", I guess that you no longer stand by your previous statement "The richest people in the world will always have the safest equipment...", which is perfectly fine. I am not here to attack you, just wanted to see if you could be reasoned with, out of curiosity. I wonder how informed you are about this when you say "two invited little people" btw, as both dear moon and inspiration 4 brings along more than two regular people.
    1
  47.  @hawkdsl  so is yours.
    1
  48.  @Grak70  and why is that distinction so important when talking about the number of rocket launches happening? Launches are launches.
    1
  49.  @Grak70  do you not understand how reaching orbit works? If a rocket reaches orbit, it has reached orbit.
    1
  50.  @Grak70  "Nobody’s talking about ..." What was Scott talking about? "Honestly I’m shocked some of you fan boys can put on your pants in the morning…" Now why would you go and write something dumb like that? You could easily have avoided that.
    1