Comments by "TheBlackSpark" (@theblackspark2644) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. I feel like even if Vivek poor foreign policy (and I'm not convinced it is) it's still worth voting for him.
    135
  2. Sounds only playing in one ear bud for some reason. Forbes fix your sound!
    25
  3. Why do Forbes clips always have scuffed audio?
    24
  4. Amazing, Forbes finally managed to not scuff up the audio.
    24
  5.  @LazyEyePolitics  Yeah I don't see it.
    23
  6. Holy smokes the audio. Is this intentional? Why is it always so bad on Forbes??
    18
  7. Trump/Vivek 2024 ?
    11
  8. What's he lying about? You cannot expect people to believe you unless you provide some evidence. I've seen quite a few people make this claim and yet nobody has put forth any substantial evidence to support it.
    9
  9. I'm definitely going to be watching Vivek Ramaswamy moving into the 2024 election. He definitely seems to be a highly competent and intelligent presidential candidate with pro American values who knows how to help fix the urgent problems in this country.
    8
  10. This country needs a federal abortion ban on the grounds that the Constitution defends every human beings right to life.
    7
  11. Agenda
    6
  12. But does that make his argument wrong?
    5
  13. How do people like this even get into these offices in the first place??
    4
  14. I haven't heard him say a single false thing. Which means you're the liar here.
    4
  15. What's he selling? Where's the evidence? I could say the same about you Mr Bot.
    4
  16. They should start teaching natural family planning in schools to reduce the use of birth control and abortions.
    3
  17. He's got a YouTube channel.
    3
  18. What about em?
    2
  19. Yeah the whole public school system needs to be reworked.
    2
  20. Let's see some evidence you bot.
    2
  21. Felon or not, here we come! Trump 2034 🇺🇸
    2
  22. If that was true and relevant I'd have heard about it. Link the source it didn't happen.
    2
  23. I bet you voted for Biden
    2
  24. Yeah but that idea was radical at the time and that's not a bad thing.
    2
  25. Biotech =//= Pharmaceutical
    2
  26. Eh, he sounds more trustworthy than you.
    2
  27. If you're finding him "unlikable" that's a you problem.
    2
  28. No country on earth is.
    2
  29. People age at different rates tho.
    2
  30. I wonder why he thinks something like that is good, hopefully he gets some pushback and changes his stance.
    2
  31. Nobody likes hecklers
    2
  32.  @jorgecarrejo  Why wouldn't a fetus be considered a human being? Because it's not fully developed yet? Because it cannot survive outside the womb? Because it's inconvenient for people to consider them humans?
    1
  33.  @jorgecarrejo  If you studied biology you would know that life begins at conception, when the sperm fertilizes the egg.
    1
  34.  @jorgecarrejo  Well if you think about it those two cells are just super underdeveloped compared to a full grown adult. Besides, they have their own DNA just 16 hours after conception.
    1
  35.  @jorgecarrejo  Ok, so how many cells does it take before you consider them human? It's obvious that those two cells grows into a human and not something else. Children have fewer cells than Adults but they're considered humans. The number of cells doesn't matter considering the temporary period of growth. Arguments based on "it's just cells" are flawed and do not stand up to examination.
    1
  36.  @jorgecarrejo I could make the same argument for why anyone under the age of 18 isn't a person because they don't have enough cells in their body. There's no logical reason why the number of cells should be what determines personhood.
    1
  37.  @jorgecarrejo  So the birth canal is what gives a baby it's rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness granted to it by a higher power?
    1
  38.  @jorgecarrejo  So now it's not the size of the baby that makes it a person but the dependency on its mother? There's a lot of people who are dependent on other people for their survival. That's a bad argument.
    1
  39. You mean political prosecution and weaponizing the FBI to push their political agenda? Yeah I agree, that's pretty unthinkable.
    1
  40. ​@robyoung-pl1gq Scumball Democrat, of course, it was unfair when you have Democrat donating judges and prosecutors who stacked the jury!
    1
  41. You guys prefer obscurity in your speech? Why? That's stupid.
    1
  42. Man this is so good, the FBI's reputation had been completely shattered and the corruption has been exposed. Well done lads! 👏
    1
  43. I haven't heard about any of that which means you made it up LMAO. Link your source or it didn't happen.
    1
  44. Sleaze ball snake detected
    1
  45. What exactly is the justification for interfering the foreign affairs of other countries? We're not the global police.
    1
  46. What "interests" are you taking about here?
    1
  47.  @douglasrowland3722  No
    1
  48. Based. Get our troops out of foreign countries and stop antagonizing other countries. We don't belong in any European wars.
    1
  49. Yeah but you could say that about anybody. We can't be so paranoid that we don't trust anyone.
    1
  50. Maybe you should have stayed in school then LMAO
    1