Comments by "TheBlackSpark" (@theblackspark2644) on "Rationality Rules" channel.

  1.  @Sarah-re7cg  "Usually Christian" let's see some data buddy, I don't buy that for a second.
    5
  2. Why is the moral argument listed here different from the one I have? Are there multiple versions of these arguments? The one I have goes like this. 1. Real moral obligation is a fact. 2. Either the atheistic view of reality is correct or the "religious" one. 3. But the atheistic one is incompatible with there being moral obligation. 4. Therefore the "religious" view of reality is correct. After this it goes on to clarify the premise and shows that the point of this argument isn't so much to prove any specific Creator but more to show that the atheistic world view isn't compatible.
    3
  3. My only issue with this video is that it acts like the watchmaker argument is the same as the design argument.
    2
  4. It sure seems that way.
    1
  5. Hold up, where are you getting that date for your claim?
    1
  6. You mean the design argument? Yeah that one is way more convincing in my opinion.
    1
  7. Ohhh I see, the watchmaker argument is not the same thing as the design argument. It's confusing because when I search up videos about the design argument the only videos I get talk about the watchmaker argument even though they're different.
    1
  8. Actually we can't assume that because suffering (physical evil) is a result of sin (spiritual evil) which comes from human free will.
    1
  9. Yeah I got confused by that.
    1
  10. My biggest issue with this video is that it talks about the watchmaker argument and acts like it's the same thing as the design argument when it's not.
    1