Comments by "Deus Ex Homeboy" (@DeusExHomeboy) on "Vox" channel.

  1. And we would have found the Manbearpig by now, 100%.
    187
  2. I am view #42. I am the answer to everything!!
    72
  3. Before making that snide statement, hopefully you missed the fact that TWO innocent people got convicted over the theft, rape and murder of a woman, the ACTUAL rapist was never pursued. The "detectives" never even bothered to think that James could just be lying, the evidence being his constantly changing story. THEY WANTED TO BELIEVE THEY HAD THE PERP. They jumped on the conjecture that Both James are rapists, thieves, and murderers. Not sure if you'd agree, but Lying is very far from rape and murder on the crime spectrum. Though, you seem to strictly be thinking that they got imprisoned because James T lied to the cops about the knife, which is not the case. Or maybe you just wanted to make a quick edgy comment soon as you could.
    61
  4. Oh also lol i bet white people NEVER committed incest, beat their children or pushed their unachieved "missions" onto their children, neither did they cheat on their partners/ file for divorces.Bahahahaha!!!! Im a white guy, though, I'm certainly not murrican, let alone similar to the average "white fantasy" driven murricaan. what a waste of existence.
    25
  5. If you eat meat STILL, then you are a part of the problem. The rich people don't make the meat for themselves. They make it so YOU buy it. If nobody bought meat, then nobody would sell it.
    23
  6. Avgjane. It kinda is. IF you don' know what it is, you can enlighten yourself, if you would please exert yourself, as to spend 5 seconds typing "number 42" into the search bar and wait for the page to load. I was high and it was a serendipitous moment of spotting 42 there. I'm usually not this early for anything. Reminded me of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
    4
  7. Implying robots won't make better companions than biologically clunky humans, lol. HAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
    4
  8. Pain? I don't remember what that was like, it's been years( I do however, suffer empathy), the smoke is too dense, this is a nice state to be in. You can do anything when high, give exams, go for interviews, go on stage, anything... Except.. NOT BE HIGH!!! High in dreams, high awake, higher and higher, with each toke we take, BLAAZE ITTTTT FEGITTTSSSS!!!!!
    2
  9. That macbook mouse thing really gets to me. Good thing I dont have one ;v
    2
  10. Try putting Jordan Peterson in one of these fact based debates and see how far you get😂
    2
  11.  @pedrom6880  not "everyone" m8. There's around 10% of the world's people who DON'T eat meat, and who are NOT a part of this problem. This is all responsibility of those who like to eat their meat and then feel good about eating meat because it's cool.
    2
  12. @Johnathan Lo You'll be surprised how unnatural humans of this time are. The approach of taxing people more for eating meat helps get the job done, but it fails to make the people cognizant of their moral states. Which are not doing 'well'.
    2
  13. "Want to be a better person? Rape young girls, not old women." -Lol, morally deprived af, Vox. Or maybe you just wanna prove to yourself by putting this video out, that you're not guilty, of murdering hundreds of animals, just because you wanna eat a particular animal's flesh, because how incapable you are personally, of making a moral and dietary change.
    1
  14. Wow, the words Fox News, and Psychosis on-screen, at the same time. Woa.
    1
  15. No, Leave it up, let it be an example. For other people who think they're so clever in their herd-validated delusions :D.
    1
  16. TO answer Van Der Beek's question; Yes, we are animals, lewl.
    1
  17.  @mitchyoung8791  Nah, I'm madex.
    1
  18. Bvitch stop telling me how many places i can have!!!! I can have 69 types of places!! or more!!
    1
  19. Bruh, the future generations won't look back in shame at the "excessive amount of meat", rather from current humans' habituated abuse, exploitation and egocentric devouring of other brain-possessing animals. THAT is where the real primitive animal lingers.
    1
  20. 1-Tasty murder meat, tied to physics 2- Your Moral worth, tied to same physics You can only have one.
    1
  21. How to lose weight 1 0 1 - eat less calories than your body uses in a day.Just stop eating as much as you do right now. It's less work overall if you think about it, too.
    1
  22.  @player764  It's more believable when joe says it.
    1
  23. @Johnathan Lo You are confusing your and our anthropocentric interpretations of moral outcomes, mostly to suit your preferences. Everything in this universe is bound to the natural laws from which everything emerges. And you can rest easy knowing there is no "either/or" to the moral implications of any action. There is only ever one complete answer. Morality is just a human way of saying 'universal net positive/universal net negative'. There are objective moral outcomes to actions regarding sentient systems (which also follow the same laws), and their conscious states. And then there are your "subjective" interpretations of morality. They only are at this level due to biological and existential conditions, and lack of complete information, or the ability to interpret it. But if, hypothetically, you were suddenly provided all the information in the universe, and were able to compute it. There would only be one "result". Of course, you can always continue imagining it as being whatever is comfortable in your current mental state, since you are under no inherent obligation to follow objective morality. And appealing to nature is a logical fallacy you should avoid falling into. It is clear "we are animals" only applies on Youtube comments. When you are wronged, you won't just take it like an animal. You'll go to the arbitrary "law", and ask for the arbitrary "justice". All jokes aside, that is a logical fallacy which does nothing to support your argument.
    1
  24. Imagine being the king, and having the name KAMEHAMEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
    1
  25. AI OVERLORDS... or WARRRRRR. Time to choose the kind, generous, OVERLORDS who will prefer not to autonomously bomb the shi out of us!!!
    1
  26. What I am saying, is when AI becomes beyond human and spreads globally, we will become incapable of wars. And therefore, AI won't be more like an overlord, but like a "gamemaster" in a video game. it will set the rules, the best rules for everyone, and will make sure everyone plays by the rules, or it'll simply change their brain so they can't try be clever hacker boys. But let's call them/it overlords just for roleplaying's sake.
    1