Comments by "Deus Ex Homeboy" (@DeusExHomeboy) on "Munchies"
channel.
-
162
-
119
-
72
-
Outside of human societies, where most "moral values" are presonalised, arbitrary and herd-serving. The act of eating a sentient organism's body is not immoral in itself, but what makes the participant moral or immoral, is whether they (a) needed to kill it for their own survival, and (b) whether the organism died of natural causes. No matter how you justify it, ultimately it is unnecessary, denies billions of sentient organisms a natural life and then has them killed and dismembered to satisfy the habits of humans.
Doing something undesired to one sentient organism is objectively equivalent to doing the same to another innocent sentient organism. If you wish to live by subjective morals that are detached from reality and can be bent anytime to preserve one's sense of "decency". I'm sure you'd have a little more problem with a human baby being raised in loving care, shown kindness and kept well and cozy, randomly strung up and decapitated one day unnaturally, then chopped up and packed for buyers to consume. But somehow you seem to conveniently presume that only your own specie and a few other cherry picked species of sentient organisms that you are "familiar and comfortable with", have some magical property that raises them above everything else.
It's all made up, completely detached from reality. You might as well wear fake elf ears and ride a horse around while holding a bow, acting like you're Legolas the eld from Lord of the Rings universe. It's equally detached from objective reality. Why even try at this point? Your whole statement is a contradiction to itself.
"probably not", I am doubtful now, as to whether you've done sufficient research to have confident in what you believe. It seems your statement is more of a symbol to convince yourself.
8
-
6
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Aldo Vazquez I understand, But he STILL, eats the same factory food, industrialised foods, all kinds of unhealthy shit, and Several Times More, too. So, he DOES have a higher propensity for disease and death.
Also, the only time one would become fat, is when they are eating more than they need to. (or they have genetic deficiencies, but that's used more as an excuse).
Twice the weight ain't twice as big, somewhat. Phelps is 1.93 meters himself. Which is not half of this guy's size. AND Swimming IS one of the HIGHEST burners of Calories, and I can bet literal money on the fact that Phelps swims more than this guy Eats and Lifts.
So, he eats twice, though he needs half, and Phelps does Twice, in Half. So he's reduced his physical efficiency down to 1/4th?
2
-
Al Simons No, not necessarily. Think of this guy as a Hummer. Huge, strong, and had made itself dependent on huge amounts of energy to function, But 20,000 is not the number.
The more energy his body gets, the LESS efficient his body will need. Because there is Morbid amounts of energy being supplied constantly.
Here's another, clearer example:
US military.
They get a lot of funds,to do their things, right?
So they spend it, here and there, throughout the year, building things, training people etc.
Say, it gets around 50 Billion in funding. But only ends up spending, say, 30 billion out of that.
At the end of the year, they say "50 billion well spent, we were stretched thing, but we managed, it is the exact amount we need to work.
Now, someone else might be sceptical about the figures, how is it even possible to spend 50 billion when the OUTPUT is NOT tallying up.
And then, some "patriot" comes, and tells them, "Hey, you need to shut the fuck up you bigot anti-american guy, you don't know what they're doing, they're protecting us from the islamists, bla bla bla, fallacy of appealing to authority, blabla bla".
So, this is the situation with Robert, and all the "calorie patriots" here.
Remember Ends do not justify the means. And Co-relation does not IMPLY causation.
Like if I ate 50 newborn chicks everyday, and then grow to be 8 feet tall, I can just attribute it to my growth, so I can justify eating a stupid amount of baby chicks, and nobody can say anything, since they haven't done the "exact same things as me", which according to most people here, is the only way you can judge someone else's actions, lol..
Yes, he got something, and lost something. Well, he isn't a "smartman" after all, so I shouldn't even have taken his "conviction of 20000" seriously, and just ignored it, but you see all these other kids and their butthurtly dumb comments? Hilarious.
Here is something to weigh it around: There will be Dozens if not hundreds of HUGE and MASSIVE strongmen, who actually won a GOLD, and in multiple occasions(unlike our 20000 calorie god), and DID NOT need 20000 calories to do it, let alone the training leading up to it. Does this not show that he DOES NOT NEED it? He might WANT IT, but he Literally, Does Not Need it. He might say he does, but that does nothing to change reality otherwise.
Oberst might be something special probably, thaa chosen golden child. We'll just have to wait and watch ;). Or not wait, just watch randomly if the thought returns 20 years later. :D
2
-
J.M. Lindner I think someone who deliberately continues pretending like they're right, despite being destroyed in all departments, factual or otherwise.
Yes, your lack of ability to "pay attention" to anything, seems to be your major cause of your denial, and desperate evasion of reality. When someone mentions a mistake of yours, you can either accept fault, or waste energy defending something that isn't even there in the first place.
I am not projecting my ego. I merely stated a factual truth of him being terrible at calorie management, let alone all the dirty shit he consumes on the way. Of which there is clear evidence, by the distribution of fat in his body, and fat's just one of the problems.
No glass houses here.. I do wish my room had one more window tho, helps make a good oath for air drafts.
2
-
J.M. Lindner When you write "You're" instead of "your", it does show that you put in conscious effort to type 2 extra keys, thinking that it was the right one.
Worse yet, when someone else remarks at your mistake, you AGAIN, always start by getting butthurt and lashing back, in some effort to undermine or completely disregard the statement.
When just admitting your fault (even silently), would save you the bother of ever typing the wrong your/you're again, but again, your shadow of an ego, pops up and makes you feel like you have some authority to reject truth, simply because it does not consonate with what you think of yourself. Why? Because you live life thinking that whatever you think is justified, and you prefer to reject an idea than to accept being wrong.
Just admitting fault can save you so much effort. But again, to fix the dissonance, you would rather wage war about it than admit and stop making the mistake.
2
-
2
-
CurrencyPrime "One of the best". Claim made, prove it. I don't see any trophies, and there's tens of thousands of strongmen in the world, if not more, and you have nothing to deny that there's people who do better than him at lesser, overall calorie cost, conclusion; his diet, and causally, body is inefficient.
People like you only suck up on other people's beings and leech off them, just to feel less worthless. The typical "Oh, since you're not a participant in the action, you cannot criticise it, but oh yes, all praises are welcome, since we're little butthurt kids who can't deal with any kind of scrutiny, due to psychological inadequacies." Sorry, now I know ^-^.
All I did, was accurately describe his incorrect overestimation of what he needs. He fucking feels dizzy not doing anything if he doesn't get all that flesh deep in him.
If he DID actually have a clear understanding of how HIS body worked, he wouldn't be looking like a pig, but would be fitter.
But then of course, most people like you, like to warp the idea of fitness to suit yourself and your ideas, rather than admitting fault.
"I am the best in the world at doing X activity, because nobody else does it, so I am the champion and the authority and everyone else is wrong. Oh look, we have a competition where people numbering from hundreds to thousands, and not 7 BILLION, let's pull titles out of our steroid filled asses, like "world's strongest man", because logic. Good job sucking the fuck out of this ideology tho :D.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
CurrencyPrime Lol, I do, but kids like you can't hold complex rules for reality. Your brain functions on things like "X works at Y and has spent quite some time there, X knows everything about Y and everyone else is wrong, other than the people who praise X, because hypocritical double standards"
You must just be a low functioning human being, with basic social-survival intellect, and can't think complex thoughts or process information that makes you look like a sycophantic suckup, but I think I just have to remind you this:
You are the one who got butthurt here, all I did, was write a comment on the video and left. You were the one who got butthurt and had to write something (even though completely unsubstantiated, and merely pulled out of your own ass). Whatever happened after that, was just me replying to people writing on my OP. so, time to self-reflect for you ^-^.
Wow, kids like you are stupid enough for me to feel like I have to waste my time writing these things, or maybe nobody else ever might for you, and then you'll just remain as dumb and ignorant as you are now, so I'm kinda trying to help you <3.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** Oh good god, yes I have, since it was IN the video.
Of course I won't be running behind a strongman trophy, just how I won't be running behind a figure ice skating. They're all petty titles that people chase all their lives, when all they ever had to do, was to realise their strength themselves, lol.
A "TITLE" is a TITLE, not the "TRUTH". "Miss Universe, DOES NOT MEAN, Mistress of the universe. "Mister World, DOES NOT mean mister of the world. "Strongest man trophies" DO NOT make the person "The Strongest man". It's just a human concept, and equally petty. Just because a bunch of people start caring about these things, doesn't change their worthlessness and arbitrariness.
What does the number of trophies he has, have anything to do with anything?
If a guy who has 1 more award than him, comes an tells him that he is an idiot, then you will probably believe him instantly, because of the 1 more trophy he has, lol.
I Guarantee to you, that even if he wanted, he wouldn't be able to hold his breath for more than a few seconds, and would lose to little kids. Should I call him a loser who can't even hold his breath for longer than little Children, but still calls himself a "strongman"? Lol, no. Because that's how idiots think.
He didn't win trophies on calorie utilization mastery, nor did he win the national trophy of knowing what to eat, and knowing how much one needs to eat.
I Can use the same trophy argument in the other direction and just say "Nope, he doesn't count for shit, since he has no world championship trophies." But then I would just be deliberately lowering my logic, just to feel like I am making sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Anthony Bachour Difference between "Huge calorie intake to maintain body fat" and "consuming 20,000, Ten times the average calories".
" Also I don't know your goals but being 6'1'' at only 165lbs is nothing to brag about ;)" Wrong. You are the one brining out his dimensions, do you not think it sensible for a context and contrast?
But of course, someone who's set on defending the guy, will certainly think anyone who mentions a number, is "bragging", lel.
"You also know nothing about nutrition if you think that maintaining 400lbs body weight while doing extremely demanding physical exercise doesn't require a way above average calorie intake."
*Wrong again, but you have already drawn long conclusions,so*.
There's a difference between maintaining 400 pounds of non-fat, Lean muscle AND Between hitting the 400 number with a huge belly and stuffing oneself calling it "training food, extreeemeee".
Of course, he's taken the easy way in. Like most do anyway, which is not a surprise.
Also remember fat is lighter than bones and muscle.
And you ACTUALLY think that a man whose 6'8'', has to "work hard to maintain 400 pounds". Lewl.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Za Warudo... WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! MUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDA The idea of an "average man" again, I suppose, differs depending on geographical regions. I've lived in places where people couldn't drive to work, because there were no roads, so they climbed mountains everyday, and then worked on the mountains.
Also; "say everyone starts doing really bad in the tests one day, and you're the only one who scores relatively higher marks. But, did the others lowering their own level of scoring, suddenly make you better?" Yes, but only in comparison :D
Someone still has to explain to me, How he manages to burn 20,000 Calories, in under SIXTEEN HOURS? He sure as fuck doesn't look like someone who can exercise for long amounts of time in a stretch. More of an explosive strength kind of guy. That makes it more likely for him to workout even less in a day.
Dat name thooooooooooooooooooooooo
OOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOO
O
OOOOOO!!!::
OOO!!
1
-
onlymoneyloves You are misinformed if you think I give a fuck about lay minded people giving a fuck about what I say. Therefore, your fucks, become irrelevant.
Leeeeel, Your idea of what "matters", seems to be copied from the general population around you. Do you even think anyone's gonna remember his "uber 20000 calorie diet of manliness", a few years in the future, when people realise how pathetic a diet like this is? Of course you do. Wishful thinking is strong in this one.
"I'll just play this charade I am surrounded by and pretend like it's the shit, since there's idiots idiotic enough to buy it, and then we'll all close our ears and scream at any other opinion, until we die, so we never have to face reality." lelelele
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nas Weekes Ok. I'll just put some more detail into the facts here>, rather than just looking at the points that support your argument.
Marius Pudzinaowski
February 7, 1977 (age 37)
Other names Dominator, Pyton, Pudzian
Nationality Polish
Height 186 cm (6 ft 1 in)
Weight 142 kg (313 lb)
So, Marius is EIGHT years older. only FOURTY Kilos LESS, and only SEVENTEEN Centimetres shorter. Has actually won a gold (If you are the kind of person who takes medals as something important, which is likely.)
Robert Oberst
December 20, 1984 (age 29)
United States United States
Other names "OB"
Occupation Strongman
Height 203 cm (6 ft 8 in)
Weight 181 kg (399 lb
This boy, is ONE HUNDRED Pounds heavier, and only SEVEN inches taller, and ALSO YOUNGER, But FATTER, and WEAKER, and MORE CALORIE DEPENDENT. It's called being a fatty who eats 20,000 Calories in a day, can lift some weight.
I Just don't see the logic, maybe there is none to him.
Coorelation does not automatically imply causation.
1
-
1
-
Krešimir Duvnjak You're wrong.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2177613/Michael-Phelps-12-000-calories-day-dont-doing-harm.html
Please, do explain how "phelps swimm*ed and eat a lot, that's true, but swimming is less calorie demanding than strongman training. I must say, you obviously don't know what a strongman training looks like. "
Phelps eats 12000 Calories in a day (He's skinnier and 4 inches shorter, and STILL TAKES THIS MUCH ENERGY), " swimming is less calorie demanding. " Lol...
Also, Since you like the basic societal mentality of perception and 'value', The Fatty hasn't won a single world championship gold, and Phelps has more than I remember.
And I'm not even defending or attacking anyone, lol. People should do some checking before they waste their own time, and mine :|...
1
-
***** It's not my fault, that people, repeatedly use the same reasoning. "You can't say anything about him because you are not a strongman yourself." Etc,etc.
Totem did point again, at "my lack of being a strongman.", Even if not entirely basing it upon oberst.
So I guess only a mad man can call another mad man, mad. I guess asylums should be run by crazies, and Managers who've never played football themselves, should just shut the fuck up and not tell the footballers what they're doing wrong, etc.etc.
This is not a competition, I am not ahead, and neither is anyone else. It's just a remark, that some people seem to take offence at. *Despite themselves, feeling like they have some authority to defend him and then tell me things like* "You can't say anything because [insert random argument here]"...
1
-
1
-
1