Comments by "Deus Ex Homeboy" (@DeusExHomeboy) on "China’s Obsession with Mink Coats" video.

  1. Most people here have fooled themselves into thinking there is a moral difference between taking another animal's skin to wear, against its will, and taking another animal's body parts to eat, against its will. It's sad when people live with such self-handicapped cognition. All the damage they cause, and where their moral state ends up ;>
    104
  2. Benjamin Hanley, another thing ""King John Un by the way I don't support the fur trade at all"". You don't have to virtue signal to me about that, you can just get to the point and tell me exactly why what I originally posted was """was the most pretentious condescending drivel I've ever read.""" according to you. Don't detract from your original point lol. I don't care about hurting your or anyone's feelings, just be sure to illustrate why I am wrong. I don't need to be told why I offend someone's sensibilities. Just point out the actual error k thanks.
    5
  3. Just because "Opinions" are subjective, does not magically convert all facts about reality into "opinions", and neither are all opinions equally baseless as yours. Example: There is a spherical ball on a table. - I say it is spherical and a ball. (sure, this might be my opinion, but it is based on reality and can be proven as such, which makes it more than just an opinion, it becomes fact. - You say it is a pyramid of the illuminati. (sure, this might be your opinion, But you've just pulled it out of your ass, and it has no basis in reality, and at no point will the spherical ball change itself to fit your opinion.) You are the kind of person who tries to outright flatten all moral potential of humanity by saying shit like 'we just don't know', so you can hide and justify your immoral state and immoral habits. Ben, spend some time working on your cognition, it's poorly formed right now, and seems to be deformed to serve your needs, rather than observe the real world.
    4
  4. Oh man what is this? "kind of like how a closeted gay man would grow a beard to cover up for their insecurity with their sexuality you instead attacking people with strength try to bog them with words you think they won't understand but to me it just seems like you're trying to look smart and coming off insecure and arrogant although it's possible that it's not insecurity but narcissism" That was a tangent, you again, just gave your subjective opinion on what you subjectively perceived. *You have continuously failed to mention a single fact that proves that I am being 'self-righteous, etc.' it's like you've deluded yourself into thinking that your personal interpretations have any inherent value. "oh and why do you expect scientific facts in an argument about morality that's rather silly" Another stupid statement from someone who's clearly scientifically ignorant but thinks his opinion is just as valid as everyone else's. Now that is an inferiority complex trying to compensate, if nothing else. Because of how limited your knowledge of biology is, you are incapable of observing the details of cognitive experience that underlie all conscious existence. The same conscious experience that creates moral structures, and even in non human species, organisms inherently experience moral and immoral behaviors. And ultimately, all biology emerges from the laws of this universe, that means THEY ARE FIXED IN PLACE, and everything emerging from it, will follow the same laws. Too bad for you there is no space in it for your made up interpretations. Just because you hold made up opinions about what morality is, and just because you like to believe that there is no way morality can be objective, despite every mechanism involved in existence, is objective. The subjectivity only arises from your ignorance and need to compensate for the lack of knowledge, the same knowledge that you have NEVER IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE, bothered to pursue, but FOR YOUR ENTIRE LIFE, YOU HAVE PRESUMED GARBAGE BELIEFS TO COMPENSATE. And frankly, you seem to be offended more than irritated. Like some primitive behavior of yours was just evoked when you read through what I wrote. Perhaps you've got a history of animal abuse, that could be plausible seeing how defensive you've gotten.
    4
  5. And if you just want to play a trash talking game where both people just make shit up and throw it at each other, where everything is make belief with potential of infinite arguments, you can just go somewhere else. Seeing from the way you're continuing, you don't seem open to facts, and continue using baseless deflection tactics. Maybe some random coincidence might change your mind, as direct confrontation with your errors don't seem to have much effect. Sure I might sound crude, but I really don't want to waste my or anyone else's time in circular yammering.
    3
  6. Oh Benjamin haha this will be funny. I see you writing about how wrong I am and how I'm "FORCING MY WORLDVIEW DOWN OTHERS THROATS OMFGGGG!! GRAPHIC ALERT!!!!!! *But what you clearly haven't done yet, is actually quote my "mistakes" and correct them. You've simply driveled about how "I am attacking toxic masculinity and force fucking people's throats with my world view." Are you so sensitive that you'd see someone type a comment on youtube, and begin thinking how they MUST BE FORCING THEIR VIEWS DOWN OTHERS THROATS.. by TYPING ON YOUTUBE!!!! So, before you try continuing on any further. Do make the effort of ACTUALLY REFUTING WHAT I ORIGINALLY POSTED. Mention my errors, followed up by correction. And be sure to make the effort of basing what you write, entirely on scientific facts. If you put in any subjective interpretations, I will trample them.
    2