Comments by "Deus Ex Homeboy" (@DeusExHomeboy) on "Cash Slaves: Inside the Dystopian Fetish of Financial Domination" video.

  1. Ash Bartlett Actually, EVERYTHING PSYCHOLOGICAL, STEMS FROM BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS!!!  (surprise; even your comment), time to play, dammmmmmmit. Also, since you've stated "evolutionary psychology". Maybe you should try dwelling into the bit where the men actively seek out women/OtherMen in order to fulfill the urges stemming from THEIR BIOLOGY, which is affected by their genetics, to how their mommy treated them, etc,etc.  "seems like a normal desire of women" >>See how you used "normal", showing that you don't consider this to be a ridiculously low % of the population as  claim it to be NORMAL, lol. Which is why I called it a generalisation. BECAUSE  the words NORMAL and GENERALISATION also have LITERAL meaning. "as opposed to a fetish (of men)".  Lol, how can you just jump over the fact of that Person ACTIVELY seeking out someone to dominate him, but seem to hit the imaginary wall of "ITS THE WOMEN LUSTING FOR MONAAYAY". Seems shallow as fuck. FUCK, I NEED TO EAT BREAKFAST!!! FUCKING INTERRUPTIONSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!! STAPHHH!
    4
  2. +Ash Bartlett psychoanalysis master right here yo, o wait, base generalisation spotted. scratch that.
    3
  3. Ben Baker What? Where did I make a generalisation? Seriously. I merely pointed out what op said.  Also, yes in the case of a person simply making a statement about the primary surface of said action, and giving no context as to how it holds any truth, the generalisation becomes invalid/discredited. How is it "women's desire"? Are you telling me WOMEN STARTED IT, and went around looking for MEN, to make them feel financially dominated and in turn, receive money? How many did they go through before finding the "right men" online?  Or Is it the MEN, who're the ones who WANTED to be financially dominated and actively sought out women/(men?) to accommodate their desire, by asking 'mistresses'/etc, to treat them in a way particular to what they want, which they then express to the women/(men?), and pay Willingly upon receiving said treatment?   It'd be funny if you think the first scenario is the case. Which it isn't, and that is the reason why I said what I did, lelel. Also, you don't have to defend yourself, etc,etc. I've typed about 9 times more than I would have liked to, already.
    2
  4. Ash Bartlett  That response is apt enough to reveal to me, your stance and realisation. Cognitive dissonance can be a bitch. But so can so many other things, lel.
    2
  5. Ash Bartlett "write like a person." Sheesh, one more baseless generalisaion, lol.  The shallowness is boring. You were actually saving me the pain. Some people should just be left to their own little being, where they are totally right. Can't put punctuation or capitals, or full stops, but has the gall to state shit. You must be gifted at self deception. Enjoy. 
    2
  6. But you must be feeling confident, inflated by the bandwagon I see forming here, bahahahahahaha. I'm outttttttshhhhhhhhhhhhhehe
    1