Comments by "" (@1965ace) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1. phwoarprozak http://nov79.com/gbwm/ntyg.html
    1
  2. garouHH It's a narrow band unlike water vapor. http://cosmoscon.com/2011/12/27/a-graph-on-co2-absorption/
    1
  3. Derek Your condescension lacks authority. 
    1
  4. Derek You're close minded to critical thinking. Every climate model has been wrong , the feedbacks are totally underestimated and the tsunami they swore would happen is less than a ripple if that. The theory is wrong and the evidence keeps mounting. You sound like a flat earther telling Columbus he will sail off the edge of the earth.
    1
  5. ExperienceCounts2 It's a religion with you warmers. Don't challenge anything don't question your masters. You are good sheep / fools.
    1
  6. ExperienceCounts2 You have said a lot of nothing but based on the number of insults you have made you're very emotionally invested is this false theory religion.  The negative feedbacks are completely ignored. The increase in CO2 has been 100% attributed to man, when for the past several billion years natural levels always swing up with temperature.  My authority to point out their theory is wrong comes out of their failures. They predicted a tidal wave of heat causing massive changes and yet not even a ripple. And talk about gutless, their man made global warming was revised to ambiguous climate change. Talk about not backing up what you say ........  I'm not claiming to have all the answers I'm just pointing out the snake oil salesmen to sheep like yourself. Baaaaaaa
    1
  7. ExperienceCounts2 You must feel really stupid  and offended magic troll. You are comparing CO2 a gas you exhale in every breath to arsenic. LOL  "What the fuck are the units being compared?" It's a ratio of volume, the units don't matter, and you call me stupid.........
    1
  8. George Lacroix There  is no controversy on my 6% man caused contribution, in fact 3.8% is more often quoted. The rest is basic math if you can do it........
    1
  9. ExperienceCounts2 The guy who demands to know what units are involved in volumetric ratios is calling someone stupid ...LOLOLOLOL !!!
    1
  10. Aguila701 That's the point,  it becomes increasingly ignorant, like religious dogma, to continue to believe in MMGW when more evidence comes every day that the theory is wrong. 
    1
  11. ExperienceCounts2""At what ratio does CO2 become significant?" All it takes is a yes or no answer, stupid. Can you not even manage that?" Do you realize you asked a question that cannot be answered with yes or no and then demand a yes or no answer ?  From the way you write and insult me you must be a very low brow person. I have no interest in determining for you the exact amount of CO2 it takes to become harmful but don't stop breathing just yet we are along way from it.  Stop asking ignorant questions . 
    1
  12. ExperienceCounts2 LOL
    1
  13. joeschultz2 Another idiot comparing arsenic with CO2 . WTF, why even have science, let's just compare arsenic with everything in the environment. Hey don't drink that water, a glass of arsenic will kill you . LOL
    1
  14. joeschultz2 Illogical
    1
  15. questworldmatrix Neither does imaginary environmental "problems". 
    1
  16. joeschultz2 Man caused global warming is imaginary . 
    1
  17. joeschultz2 Deliberately misquoting me and misleading my point makes you a dishonest person and a liar. When you quote someone and change what they said (not paraphrasing) you are a fraud and your argument relies on lies, but isn't that the whole case of the warmers ? 
    1
  18. joeschultz2   You're a liar who has been caught and you won't admit it , no surprise here. 
    1
  19. Ardy F Your an idiot to think I'm the only one who disagrees.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/ http://www.petitionproject.org/review_article.php I have spent hundreds of hours studying Einstein's theories by the way. 
    1
  20. ***** http://www.space.com/2942-sun-activity-increased-century-study-confirms.html
    1
  21. joeschultz2 Too bad for you it hasn't warmed since 1998, so much for CO2 leading temperature ..........and half the 20th century is out of reach for the warmers. Let's not forget the ice age predictions from the 70's . I think your warmers movement is falling apart LOL. 
    1
  22. joeschultz2 I don't agree with every point of the article however your article from 2008 has been 100% wrong. LOL There has been fewer and weaker hurricanes. 
    1
  23. joeschultz2 When you have to cite "scientists" to refute what everyone can see for themselves in some convoluted concoction  it brings more doubt to the thing these "scientists" believe in .....warming.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/08/sorry-global-warmists-but-extreme-weather-events-are-becoming-less-extreme/ This thing is more cult like every day where the true believers like you favor the priests revelations and disbelieve your own eyes. 
    1
  24. ExperienceCounts2 It's funny how you accuse others of the thing you do. Go back to the Medieval warm period it's a lot cooler now.  So 17 years is not a trend, who's cherry picking now ?  I don't know why I engage with you, you by your own words are very emotionally immature. Reminds me of a grade school argument.  http://www.cfact.org/2014/09/25/new-peer-reviewed-paper-un-overestimated-climate-sensitivity-to-co2/
    1
  25. Sydney Allen Here's a little more advanced one Newtonian Physics vs General Relativity. Need more ? 
    1
  26. joeschultz2 That isn't a science consensus, that is an observation of a law of physics . Here's another one Geocentric and Heliocentric. I personally find the Michaelson Morley experiment fascinating because it disproved a theory about the either and proved a number of future theories on Special Relativity. 
    1
  27. joeschultz2 That's not a consensus it's an observation that is indisputable. A consensus is an option. 
    1
  28. joeschultz2 Wrong , the consensus was that they fell at different rates. Galileo postulated and observed something different. Today with gigantic vacuum chambers its a proven fact that feathers and bowling balls are accelerated at the same rate 32fps/ps, no consensus needed. 
    1
  29. joeschultz2 I don't care how you frame it the "consensus" was wrong before then and your proving my point. 
    1
  30. joeschultz2 Still proving my point. 
    1
  31. joeschultz2 Just like global warming began only 150 years ago to hell with everything before that right ???? Consensus is completely worthless when it's wrong and it's mostly wrong flat earther. 
    1
  32. mike o'leary I'm certainly aware of all this, my point can still be understood. Global Warming caused by man released CO2 is as scientifically wrong as a flat earth. 
    1
  33. joeschultz2 In this case, man caused global warming is wrong. There has been very valuable government research,  no one is saying anything different.  I guess you are saying,  government research is never wrong because it's been right about some things in the past ? That is pretty sycophantic isn't it ? 
    1
  34. joeschultz2 As I said in this case it's true in other cases it's not . I can't help that you see things as black and white. So is government ever wrong ???? 
    1
  35. joeschultz2 You are a government cheerleader trying to put words in my mouth. The only overwhelming evidence is the predictions have been wrong and therefore their understanding of climate mechanisms are wrong too.That is mountains of evidence. 
    1
  36. joeschultz2 Predictions are wrong 97.4% of the time, I'd say that is a terrible track record.  http://www.westernjournalism.com/global-warming-predictions-proven-wrong-97-4-time/
    1
  37. ExperienceCounts2 Hey moron I'm not masquerading as several people to get my point across.  https://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Climate-Hype-Exposed.pdf I don't need "one" or a hundred corrupt sources to validate my position all I need is FACTS. Something you can't conceive because it conflicts with your beliefs.
    1
  38. ExperienceCounts2 Hey moron the evidence is overwhelming. The predictions are embarrassingly WRONG. Warmers have lost almost all their credibility. 
    1
  39. joeschultz2 Now your using local events to defend global predictions that on the whole aren't happening.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3052926/Our-climate-models-WRONG-Global-warming-slowed-recent-changes-natural-variability-says-study.html
    1
  40. ExperienceCounts2 You might have a point if the evidence wasn't so overwhelming that the "science" hasn't been completely wrong and corrupt with politicians and crooks making money. 
    1
  41. ExperienceCounts2 Hey Moron open your eyes it's not happening it's a scam. 
    1
  42. ExperienceCounts2 Hey Moron , I'm not even sure there is a "conspiracy" I'm pointing out the whole thing is wrong and the participants won't admit the truth because they are either making a living at it or getting rich $$$$$$. 
    1
  43. ExperienceCounts2 Well Moron , if you think the scientific community is all in agreement then you're dumber than I thought. People like you need others to tell them what to think and your belief that they ALL agree is like a cult member.  No amount of evidence is going to dissuade a true believer like you. http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/16643-top-scientists-slam-and-ridicule-un-ipcc-climate-report Here's your peer reviewed critic.  http://www.petitionproject.org/review_article.php
    1
  44. No more feeding the Trolls, 384 comments is enough, I'm going to spend my time taking down more global warming videos. 
    1
  45. ExperienceCounts2 All of them including yours.  You even sound like a raving lunatic, incensed that anyone would question your religion. It starts showing it's true colors when the leaders accuse people of being "deniers" and demanding the infidels be rounded up and jailed. YUP it's a cult ........ 
    1
  46. ExperienceCounts2 ALL OF THEM ! They will all say the scientific evidence points to their particular belief, creation, evolution, heliocentricism, Greek gods, Roman gods etc.   The warmer's cult is also rife with FAILED PROPHETIC PREDICTIONS, they adjust their view so as to still continue to believe. When predicted global warming catastrophic disaster didn't happen year after year after year they finally decided to tell members it's really "climate change" they need to fear. More hurricanes, tornadoes etc, BUT the current real data for that is once again proving them wrong........less tornadoes and fewer hurricanes.  They keep holding on for a shred of evidence and true to any cult, a sign will come, a year with a couple more natural disasters. Then it's absolutely confirmed , time to sacrifice some more virgins in the volcano. Just a shred of evidence is all you need...............and that is exactly what this cult is based on. 
    1
  47. ExperienceCounts2 Just like that 97% right?   http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/ Fewer Tornadoes and Hurricanes !!! MMGW isn't science, the scientific method has proven it wrong.  Make observations. Propose a hypothesis. Design and perform an experiment to test the hypothesis. Analyze your data to determine whether to accept or reject the hypothesis. It's not abnormally warming and weather is not getting abnormally or even a little worse. It's imaginary, just like the belief's of any other cult.  I'm done responding to you, You don't understand the science. You won't employ any critical thinking.  You think consensus will change real observations.  And you're an arrogant little prick. 
    1
  48. Dai Qibao The guy is obsessed with his imaginary problem. He would love the Fascists to come lock up all the infidels who doubt in his imaginary crisis. 
    1
  49. 7 million , you mean less than 3% of the nation ????? I guess we can call them the 3%ers . The most pathetic government program ever !!! What a joke . 
    1