Comments by "" (@1965ace) on "AMAZING 35% More MPG with HHO? Let’s find out! Help with high gas prices?" video.

The laws of physics cannot be violated. The system gets it's actual power from the alternator in a conversion to HHO. Energy conversion is always running at a loss so yes you are making HHO which is energy that can be burned in the engine but the parasitic loss of power from the alternator on the engine is actually greater so the theory is actually flawed so testing for more power and efficiency could be proved wrong with basic science but we are all enjoying the video.
1
@keithfucious7067 "The amount of energy used to extract the hydrogen has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of energy contained within the hydrogen" It takes more energy to release the potential energy so it has everything to do with the energy needed to release it. That is the energy to start the process. When HH and O burn it becomes H2O again all you did was use energy (more) to separate them and when they recombined they released energy (less). If you can separate them without using more energy then you truly have an energy source. Basic Science.
1
@keithfucious7067 We are not talking about splitting an atom (Weak Nuclear Force) we are talking about the Electromagnetic Force holding molecules together so much weaker on the level of forces. Breaking molecular bonds and through another process bonding them together again, energy in and energy out that is all. You aren't gaining a thing.
1
@keithfucious7067 All processes lose energy it's called entropy, even if you had a way to break the bonds that didn't lose energy you still would not get a net positive.
1
@keithfucious7067 You are trying to mock the exact thing that is happening. The product of burning hydrogen is water and heat. The heat that does work comes from electrolysis (breaking the bonds). It takes work to break the bonds and when recombined that energy is realized again. This is why magnets pulled apart will have the potential energy to pull themselves together again. They can store potential energy but require the same energy to break them apart to begin with.
1
@keithfucious7067 Molecular bonds are like magnets so let's say you have two or 3 magnets stuck together They only have the potential to do work that comes from being separated when they are separated by force, a force that happens to be equal or greater than it takes to separate them. There are 4 forces gravity, EM, the Weak Force and the Strong Force. The bonds we are talking about are EM (electromagnetic). If you can break the bonds with less force than they are held together with you have a source of energy but when it takes an equal or greater energy to make HH and O you only have a conversion and if possible an equal conversion but never will you have additional energy. This is not to say the Strong Force within the atoms has a potential for much greater energy but that has nothing to do with molecular bonds. You are either a smart guy who has the wrong idea and will investigate this yourself or you are an ignorant guy who thinks he's smart and doesn't care to test his own assumptions.
1
@keithfucious7067 There is so much wrong with what you said first of all the bonds are Electromagnetic. The anatomy of an atom is the nucleus is positively charged which attracts the negatively charged electrons. You don't even seem to understand that electrical current is Energy. Learn the law of energy conservation to understand the additional energy used to break the bonds is spent in the combustion when the hydrogen rebonds with oxygen. You put more energy in than you got out and H2O is exactly the same as it was before and you seem to think you got something out of it that you didn't put in in the first place.
1
@keithfucious7067 3rd reply, in the beginning, you start with H2O, in the end, you finish with H2O and combustion energy where did this energy come from? That is the question you have to answer and understand.
1