Comments by "" (@1965ace) on "Big Think" channel.

  1.  It has all the markings of a religion such as the Christians believe in a 6 thousand year earth, the Warmers believe it all started about 150 years ago. The sacraments are taxes and regulations for carbon sin. The demons are big business and Satin is big oil. You are an apostate denier and labeled sinful and ignorant if you don't believe . I think the arrogance comes from their belief in their moral superiority. Their God is Gaia and they hate anyone who threatens her. Yes it's much clearer to understand as a religion. Al Gore is a very rich hypocritical TV evangelist. The ipcc is like the vatican producing dogma that is not to be questioned.  They aren't content to practice their faith alone they must proselytize everyone including the children. The apocalypse is coming because man is sinning and they must save as many as they can and pay penance for their carbon sin. You see man by his very exhalation is a sinner, he was born into it. The only answer is defend the faith, vote democrat and drive a Prius Also Man released CO2 is only 1 / 41,666th of the atmosphere based on 6% of 400 ppm which is grossly exaggerated considering all CO2 is not recycled every year. 
    2
  2. Gabriel Hibbitt Really ? The Warmers solutions to a nonexistent problem is anti-Capitalism, anti-Americanism, anti-business, big government regulation. 
    1
  3. Solar panels are crap, it would take 37,000 ft2 just to run my car. Cost is the least problem with solar panels, what are we going to do cover every square inch of the planet in solar panels? On CO2 every legitimate study proves that it follows a temperature increase and is not causation. In any event the LFTR will be the future of energy unless we regress back to the caves which seems more likely every day.
    1
  4. With all due respect to mathematicians of course. Here is a clue, unification is only found in special relativity. Happy hunting mathematicians.....
    1
  5. If special relativity applies to "strings" then they are appearing to vibrate consistent to their own reference frames, does that change their properties for different reference frames ? Rhetorical special relativity is proven, string theory is the invention of unimaginative mathematicians.
    1