Comments by "Self-Law" (@thegroove2000) on "Jeremy Corbyn reveals Labour's Brexit plan" video.

  1. MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT/HOUSE OF LORDS HAVE NO POWER OR JURISDICTION WHATSOEVER. AND NEITHER DO THE OTHER DIRTY UNCLEAN HANDS THAT ARE PULLING THE STRINGS FROM BEHIND THE SCENES. Something that is so fraudulent that has deceived so many for so long could never be considered to have any true lawful/moral authority. This is conclusive.
    1
  2. There can be no Government because there is no separation. All the parties are bound by the same rules,conventions of the House and all the members have taken the same false oath/affirmation of allegiance. IT' IS ALL CORRUPTION. A MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. YOU HAVE ALL ABUSED THE TRUST AND MISLED THE MANY FOR SO LONG. THIS IS DEPLORABLE. THERE HAS TO BE ACCOUNTABILITY.
    1
  3. Where there is no trust there is no moral obligation and because Parliaments members presumed/assumed authority has now been rebutted then any legal obligations and encumbrances are therefore nullified and they include the presumptions/assumptions of being a Citizen, member of the Public, a Human, Natural Person and all associated concepts.
    1
  4. THE PSEUDO OATH The fake without substance oath of allegiance to Elizabeth (who has no legal powers over Parliament ) that the members of Parliament the Privy Council the Police, Judges and some of the military take. So ask yourself why are oaths/affirmations taken to someone who has no power or authority over the business of Parliament?. Why would members of Parliament feel the need to use so many fictions if they had any real power and authority? Excerpt from the book The Rape of the Constitution pages 39 to 40 written by the former late MP Tony Benn - While in modern democracies the President, as head of state, takes an oath to uphold the constitution, the oaths of allegiance in Britain contain no obligation to serve the interests of the people or to respect democratic rights.
    1
  5. YOU HAVE ALL BEEN DECEIVED. THE SHAM DEMOCRACY Representative Democracy is a wicked fraud and voting is a great deception. There is no Democracy when the assumptions of Parliamentary Sovereignty and the pseudo constitution is at play. That is an oxymoron. THE PSEUDO OATH The fake without substance oath of allegiance to Elizabeth (who has no legal powers over Parliament ) that the members of Parliament the Privy Council the Police, Judges and some of the military take. So ask yourself why are oaths/affirmations taken to someone who has no power or authority over the business of Parliament?. Why would members of Parliament feel the need to use so many fictions if they had any real power and authority? Excerpt from the book The Rape of the Constitution pages 39 to 40 written by the former late MP Tony Benn - While in modern democracies the President, as head of state, takes an oath to uphold the constitution, the oaths of allegiance in Britain contain no obligation to serve the interests of the people or to respect democratic rights. THE PSEUDO ENGLISH CONSTITUTION Not forgetting the presumption/assumption the fictional English constitution that is another sly and cunning deception. THE CROWN CONCEPT Utter nonsense. Another fiction (legal). HM And anything that refers to HM this and HM that as in her Majesty's Government, Courts, Prisons, Revenue and Customs is misleading at the very least.
    1
  6. THE GRAND CON HAS NOW BEEN EXPOSED.
    1
  7. The rebuttal of some of the presumptions/assumptions/fictions ELIZABETH 2ND Elizabeth's position and role is what is imagined up as a constitutional monarch. A titular symbolic head of state who legally has no powers or authority over the business of parliament. Her role is mainly ceremonial and for a sense of national identity. Royal assent is formality as Elizabeth so she does not even need to look at any bills passed that become acts. Queen Elizabeth II "I do not give you law or administer justice" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMBHfVjsIZo And also when one looks at the definitions of the terms sovereign and monarch, she can be neither in truth. Here are some examples for you to look at your leisure. For centuries there has been many attempts to obfuscate from the truth by use of propaganda so watch out for the play on words. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_monarchy#England_and_the_United_Kingdom https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/titular https://www.royal.uk/role-monarchy https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/titular https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jeremy-corbyn-refuses-to-bow-queen-speech-wink-parliament-state-opening-a7800661.html Corbyn - We have a titular head of state as the Monarch but without political power." https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/royal-assent/ https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/formality https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/monarch https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sovereign I can go on and on and on. There is much history that leads up to when the assumed powers of kings and queens were severely restricted. It is all there for you to study. Also if Elizabeth ruled then you would be a subject and not a citizen. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/citizen She misled and deceived the many at her Coronation oath ceremony in 1953 as evidenced by the above. BBC TV Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II: Westminster Abbey 1953 (William McKie) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52NTjasbmgw The Archbishop or bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?" The King and Queen shall say, "I solemnly promise so to do." Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgements?" King and Queen, "I will." Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?" King and Queen, "All this I promise to do." After this, the King and Queen laying his and her hand upon the holy Gospels, shall say, King and Queen, "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep: So help me God.nation oath.
    1
  8. Manifestos are not legally binding neither are referendums.
    1
  9.  @hairyairey  https://www.businessinsider.com/green-eu-referendum-not-legally-binding-brexit-2016-6?r=UK&IR=T hence why the voters were not allowed to decide on the outcome of the vote as it went to parliament to decide. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/24/supreme-court-brexit-ruling-parliament-vote-article-50. Millions have been utterly hoodwinked and bamboozled.
    1
  10.  @hairyairey  judicial review or personation is rather irrelevant in the grand scheme of things and is not the main issue. Let us look at the facts of the matter. The issue is that the masses have been deceived on a scale that beggars belief. . 1. There is no Constitution. The assumption is that there is an unwritten one. 2. Representative Democracy is a wicked fraud because of the assumption or Parliamentary Sovereignty. 3. The Crown is an assumption also that does not exist in substance in reality. It is a concept. 4. The pseudo oath/affirmation of allegiances that members of parliament take is fraudulent because they swear to serve Elizabeth but she has no legal powers as a titular head of state over the business of Parliament. 5. In that oath.affirmation nowhere does it mention anywhere that they have sworn any allegiances and to be faithful to the electorate or the population as a whole. Some examples - Now what is a legal fiction. legal fiction noun an assertion that is accepted as true for legal purposes, even though it may be untrue or unproven. The European settlement in Australia in 1788 as (empty land) was a legal fiction as it suppressed the fact that the land was inhabited ... by the aboriginal peoples." Now we can see that the use of technical but unlawful legal fictions is how the Establishment and the legal fraternity working together have tricked and deceived the masses into accepting the many assumptions that allows the Establishment to appear to be a legitimate assembly. Fraud/deception is a wrong and even more so when done legally in order to trick those who do not understand the legal system so to lead them into error, and of course that allegation will not be accepted because of the assumption of parliamentary sovereignty/ the pseudo constitution and so the courts will uphold and accept those assumptions/fictions to be true. Legality is not morality. Legal is the antitheses of lawful The floor is yours.
    1
  11.  @hairyairey  Seven immutable pillars of Law for a rule to be accepted. 1.If it is illogical it cannot be law 2.If it is dishonest it cannot be law 3.If it is repugnant it cannot be law 4.If it is unequal it cannot be law 5.If it is unknowable it cannot be law 6.If it is incomprehensible it cannot be law 7.If it is unreasonable it cannot be law
    1
  12. CORBYN IS A PERFIDIOUS TRAITOR. HE AND THE REST ARE PLAYING YOU ALL FOR FOOLS.
    1
  13. BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH. HE IS GIVING YOU LIP SERVICE.
    1