Comments by "Self-Law" (@thegroove2000) on "Demanding Facts Not Beliefs On The Resurrection | Bob| Speakers Corner" video.

Bob has fallen for the roman deception. The bible is a book of deception based on ancient manuscripts that were taken by the Romans when they invaded ancient Egypt and the middle east. The ancient stories were rewritten to suit the aims and needs of the roman catholic church. Do you all know that the man was not born as Jesus? he was born in the middle east and had a middle eastern name. The romans named him jesus as that name is a roman name. DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE LOOK AND YOU WILL START TO SEE. Also, all the images of the man portray him as a white man when that is a blatant deception as the man would have had brown skin as he was born in the middle. Any disagree then feel free to discuss this clear controversy.
2
That is a weak counter-argument especially when you don't really know when the actual bible was really compiled. Hint it was much later that what is told. Also, if you could be bothered to do any research you would see that many Roman names ended in US. The man was not a Roman and Jesus is a Roman name. So are you claiming the man they call Jes-US was not born in the middle east then? @emetechad4621
1
@emetechad4621 Yes good points. I don't want to give too much away for now but he was born in the Arabian Peninsula and his last name was the same as the area he came from. Like many families whose names were based on where they were born in the middle east. I would suggest you open your own mind and start to think for yourself. Go and look up the name Jesus and you will see that many Roman names ended in US. So he could not have been born with that name, and we know the Romans occupied the middle east at the time he was born and lived.
1