Comments by "lina nicolia" (@linanicolia1363) on "Al-Qaeda Now In Charge Of Syria! w/ Richard Medhurst" video.
-
Mosadegh was their only elected, democratic leader. He wanted to do everything right for Iran. However, the UK and the US wanted to share some of that oil Iran had, so he had to go. He was replaced by the Shah who turned out to be hated by his people , when he spent millions on a coronation, making himself the King of Kings. That pushed the people to the end. They got rid of him, but unfortunately they replaced him with radical clerics. That was a poor choice. Gaddafi was loved by most of his people. Small factions that were against him, came from the West, as a deterrent, as always. Qaddafi lost his life because he wanted gold for his oil instead of the US dollar. That was it. Saddam was a friend of the Bush people. He found out, they were traitors. He had rotten sons, but Iraq was better with him than they are now. History is a complicated mess.
17
-
13
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
After 9/11, the Pentagon found documents quoting, the Middle- East was being destabilized, as a goal. Al Qaeda surfaced after the 9/11 "issue" which we hear was funded by Soros. This guy now is in charge of the Rebels, who are supposedly fighting Isis and other factions, that have different agendas. Assad did not have a good reputation as horrors went on in his famous jails, enough to make you wonder. What the Hell ? Seems like Syria may end up divided in various segments, to go to the near-by neighbors, and in terms of Netanyahu, he should have been fired, a long time go . He is bringing Israel down , in a bad place.The old psychic who said WW3 started in the Middle-East, may have had a valid point. Not looking good. What motivates the US and Israel is always the potential financial benefits but never humanity.
1