Comments by "Horatio82" (@horatio8213) on "Was Finland's "Continuation War" Pre-Planned? Eastern Front #WW2" video.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 2
  6.  @ВячеславСкопюк  Finland was neutral before and after Winter War, USSR force bases for Red Army in Hanko and block defence pact between Sweden and Finland. Take bunch of teritories and block trade, excluding only vital trade with Germany. By the way Germany was only other source of food for Fins, take it to consideration. Also everybody knows what happen when USSR places bases in Baltic States. Only way to keep balance, was take (forced by trade embargo) german offer of laeasing the bases and tranist rights on Fininland's teritory. Second options was just waiting for next soviet attack and do nothing. Stalin was outraged because Moscov treaty didn't say anything about german presence in Finland and Fins were not a part of soviet-german arragments and do not have to any obligations to obey them . If soviet units in Finland didn't mean that Finland was soviet ally, that what logic support your claim that german units broke this neutrality? Portugal stay neutral even aften leasing bases to UK and USA on atlantic islands in WW2. The same neutral USA in 1940 and 1941 place military bases on british teritories! Do you need more examples? Fins just stay between two bloody tyrants and manage to use them against eachother. Next false claim. Sweden didn't stay so neutral at all. At the time of invasion on Norway in 1940, Germans forced transit of materials to Narvik. The same happend after invasion on USSR in 1941. Transport from Norway goes to Finland by swedish railways! That cause power shift in swedish politics. On the other side soviet submarines also have no problem with attacking neutral swedish merchant ships. Next point is soviet protest was based on Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, which state Finland as a part of USSR "sphere of interest". That also mean that finish goverment wasn't any part of this agrement! That was only imperial politics between Moscov and Berlin. Noone ask Fins about that! In any way they did not been obligated to do whatever Stalin and Hitler decide. I'm not claiming that Stalin was wrong in 1941-41 preparing to strike Hitler! It is sure today that Stalin's plan in 1940-41 was attack Germany and capture or destroy romanian oilfields! Stalin taking Besarabia and Bukovina give Hitler hint of his plans! There is many more evidence of that offensive preparation. Movement and preparations of soviet units long before german deployment to Barbarossa! The biggest lie is that USSR was preparing to defence! Where is that mythical defence plan for Red Army for 1941? There is no such plan, because it was never existed. Nearly 80 years ago Red Army prepare attack on III Reich and we know the name of plan, it is MP-41! Today also we know layout of sowiet armies but we still hear about mythical defence plan that noone seen till today! I ask you where is that soviet defence plan for german invasion? Can you give me source for that plan? The most stiupid claim you make is that when both countries (USSR and III Reich ) were enemies. Not really befor 22.06.1941. Using your logic Hanko base was enemy target for Germans! In that base was over 20 thousand of soldier and base was heavly fortified! When Soviets have base in Hanko and place large forces on finish border, Germans use economical means to put small forces in Finland. In the same time Stalin and Hitler talk about formal alliance and were cooperating in war against UK! About bombing on Finland, USSR were not at war in this time with Fins! Soviet or Fins didn't declare it! The same "accident" happen to city in Slovakia, then part of neutral Hungary! The same day, 25 June 1941!Maybe that was soviet mistake, but i don't belive in that. Formaly Finland and Hungary were still neutral in war between USSR and III Reich! But both of this countries never have problems with other countries neutrality, like Germans invading Belgium or Stalin "helping" Baltic States. But you will claim that befor 22.06.1941. Hitler and Stalin was enemies. Yeah right. And this enemies just politly slice half of Europe together. Final case is that Fins didn't claim or retake any teritory that wasn't finish property before 1940! They stoped on 1940's border! That was one of the many reason why Stalin didn't fully conquere Finland after 1944.
    2
  7.  @ВячеславСкопюк  No, I just claim that between 22nd-25th June finish goverment try to secure neutrality. Both III Reich and USSR was ready to war. Both have bases in Finland and right to transit troops. At 22nd June Finland were forced to give Germans everything that was guarantee in treaties, the same obligations were given to USSR! But USSR didn't "ask" Finland about help in invasion on III Reich, for USSR Finland was next target like Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary ( bombed by soviet airforce at 25th June! When Hungary was still neutral!). Fins were prepered at both situation, if soviet forces were faster the Germans wiil be in disadvantage. Between 22nd-25th Fins operate only on own territory and give transit for german forces ( the same like neutral Sweden!). Fins just have no choice, but that don't mean that they plan invasion on USSR! Because they operate only in own territory. At 25th June after soviet bombings Finish Army joint to war against USSR, but basicly stops on border from year1939! Fins didn't help in blocade of Leningrad and probably that save the city. Even in 1944 they cooperate with Red Army to remove german forces from finish territory after the talks wit USSR! Finland were not in any way interested in attacking USSR in 1941 because for Finish goverment was obvieus that III Reich will lose the war. All operations were just aim to protect teritory of Finland from pushing to war, both by USSR and III Reich. But after 22nd and 25th June that was impossiable. You should look on book of Mark Solonin, maybe then you understad of situation of Finland in 1941!
    2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1