Comments by "Horatio82" (@horatio8213) on "Explanation: Why hasn't TIK published videos on the Holocaust yet?" video.

@TheTokkin Again you miss the point. Soviet socialism was different than nazism. Noone claim that this two system were the same, the just were in origin socialist, but create own schools of socialism.
3
@TheTokkin Plus in Third Reich NSDAP put party members in position of control in companies. Yes that was direct control over the privat companies by nazi regime.
2
@TheTokkin Do you read Marx or Engels? They rejected democracy, revolution was way to ploretariat dictatorship. That is not egalitarian or democratic. Useing your definition Marx wasn't socialist. In his socialism there is no room for personal freedom.
2
@TheImperatorKnight For me there is four main ways to kill " Hitlerv didn't knew". First is Mein Kampf. Second is Wansee Protocole. Third Hitler's own public statements. Four is tricky, but even in dictatorship are some personal and political conflicts. Some would just report Hitler report that whitout his agreement someone is createing Holocaust. That will benefit the position of the side that report to Hitler. Not mention all other material evidence and eye witness testimony.
1
@TheTokkin Then read what companies were created in occiupied countries and who was in control. The same happen with property of Jews on Germany. Look on Goreing and Ley.
1
@TheTokkin They were litteraly a party controlers over company! They could do what they wish in this company if that was "in interst of Reich".
1
@LordDark102 China is state own economy. But party have absolute controle over property and people in country. That is not capitalism. For some time that was on way to switch to authoritarian state, but now China make big step back to totalitarian control with Social Credit system.
1
@Tupadre97 So strong argument. But not really. Capitalism is based on freedome of trade and service. That is so "totalitarian". I think you are some "starbucks" socialist that never taste real socialism in work. Then you wil understand what is totalitarian and what is not.
1
@jonathanliberatore3175 My political science cry when you dissmis his view. In definition @TIK is right. Simple and plain, whitout control over all aspects of life NSDAP was just authoritarian (but we know how much it is false), with including of socialist pratice you have totalitarian state. In case of property rights, economy and political system power of party and lider in Third Reich, Italy and USSR was absolute. For your argument you can change socialism to colectivism (in reality is the same form of rejection of individualism, subject that really start in second part of 19th century divide for right and left wing). This three countries were based on ideas of socialism, but from end of WW2 communist propaganda did everything to paint Hitler and Mussolini as a right wing. It is so blunt lie, because if that was true, then how USSR nearly became a member of Pact of Steel. Because that was reason why Molotov travel so many times to Berlin before Barbarossa. Maybe you gonna claim that is also falsification.
1
@TIK can you make some video comapring tactics of people like David Irving and Grover Furr? Both present them as a historians, but both are deniers, one as you know deneied Holocaust, second denied communist's crimes against humanity.
1