Comments by "Horatio82" (@horatio8213) on "Military Aviation History" channel.

  1.  书中自有黄金屋  Then read about Frampol bombings. No military value for the target. No AA defence. City was used as a pratice target to test German bombs. Nothing more. You just cherrypick examples or use sources in that way thaat by manipulation support your claims.
    1
  2.  书中自有黄金屋  Wieluń is was prove as a German war crime. Germans bomb city with knowledge that there were no Polish Army unit there. No units were there and Germans did not prove that they have any material evidence of that. And if you put whataboutism on me, I will respond that Wieluń and Frampol are simple st examples of German war crimes. Also you mention Gliwitz Provocation, you forget taht Germans were claiming Polish guilt and there were testimonies of German official that prove German false Flag operation.
    1
  3.  书中自有黄金屋  And one thing that make irrwlevant any of your claim about Wieluń. City was bombed houres BEFORE Germany declare war against Poland. That make it automaticly act of war crime.
    1
  4.  书中自有黄金屋  Unit stationed in Danzig was on Polish soil gived in international treaties. Westerplatte was Polish transit station given Poland as a part of Versalies Treaty. Also Danzig wasn't part of Germany. It was Free State under Polish and Leauge of Nation protectorate. . You really know shit about history of WW2.
    1
  5.  书中自有黄金屋  " "You want to act like the Polish had no knowledge of a German attack, even after they ignored Germany's attempts at peaceful negotiation? " There was no peacefull negotiations from German side. And German aggression had no excusse. Hitler was not interested in peace. "Then why did Poland already have troops stationed in Danzig before Germany were went in to liberate it?" 1) Poland after WW1 was given a transit station in Free City of Danzig, place was called Westerplatte and was Polish territory, then there is no occupation here. 2) Free City of Danzig was protectorate of Leauge of Nations and some part of it's policy was under Polish control. 3)Germans do not liberate Free City of Danzig, they annexed it. "Reference which law at the time that stated that any aggression before a formal declaration of war was a "war crime"?" Two main international source of laws of war: Hague Convention of 1899 Geneva Conventions 1)In international definition action like attack on Pearl Harbour or German invasion on Poland are war crime. Because in both cases attacked side were not in a stste of war with aggressor. Any signals of comming attack or intention do not give a exccusse for aggressor. Germans attack Wielun before formal delacration of war and they attack target that was without confirmed presence of enemy combatants. 2)Even your sources inform that Germans had not any confirmed informations! They bomb target without knowing position of enemy force! And later they destroy civilian infrastrucure targeting local population! Lack of confirmation is rather point for accusation not for defence. Bombing city without confirming targets is in definition war crime!
    1