Comments by "MikeAG333" (@MikeAG333) on "Putin's Dilemma: Win IMPOSSIBLE Lose" video.

  1. Russia will have lost most of Luhansk within the next week or two anyway, so Russia won't even have that to "protect".
    1
  2. Well, they're about to get Luhansk, so Crimea will have to wait a while.
    1
  3.  @EaglePicking  P1ss off half-wit. Nato isn't involved. Zelensky was legitimately elected by his own people with no input from the west. Russia didn't attack Nato, it attacked Ukraine. Nato didn't train Ukrainians after 2014.......various individual countries did, at Ukraine's request. And the West offered to get Zelensky out of the country when Russia invaded, but he daid no. How does that play into him being the Wests' puppet? Your narrative is bizarre and childish, so p1ss off back to kindergarten and finish your fingerpainting.
    1
  4. I've got to stop you. Nato isn't supplying Ukraine. Don't feed into the stupid Russian narrative. Nato has no involvement whatever. This is a coalition of western countries supporting Ukraine, some of whom happen to be members of Nato, but many aren't.
    1
  5.  @needrosneedrosov4278  Don't be stupid. I mean, pathetically childishly stupid. There are actual adults in this conversation, so see if you can act like a grown up for a second. Putin has had an absolute pummeling in Ukraine, and it's only going to get worse. He is getting this pummeling at the hands of a small country with 30 year old technology. If Nato were attacked, Russia would be annihilated.
    1
  6. The only problem with option 3 is that starting the war was in Russia's control, but stopping it is entirely in Ukraine's. They won't stop until Russia is back behind the 2014 borders.
    1