Comments by "Omer عمر" (@Omer1996E.C) on "VisualEconomik EN"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@seyyes2047 I'm tired of this argument honestly
You just got Egyptians out of the equation because it didn't fit your argument
About saudis, they have alot of cultural non religious norms, remember the car driving ban on women? Yes, it was cultural not religious law, as you know Saudis are generally traditionalist tribalists, so you shouldn't connect to everything they do culturally to Islam
Until the reformation movement, women were freer in the Islamic world than the western world, the they became equal, and in the 20th century, western women became freer in the western world.
Do you seriously think that all the economic problems are just because women are partially in the labour market, and you threw corruption, over regulation, lack of education... out of the window?!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@puraLusa when it comes to legal sharia law, only small parts of Islam is changing (with different interpretations) but these are largely overseen by non-Muslims, idk why
And about picking a side, this is not part of Islam, this is only if there was no evidence for anyone who own it, as it was said in the video, most people used oral testimonies, but in Islam you can use material evidences (and it has a priority), like an ownership paper, a paper indicating that you bought this land and others, if both of you don't have any evidence, the one who was already running that facility would be the owner
So, what we say is that you can own something and have an ownership document for it like nowadays, and it is given a priority as primary evidences.
Oral testimonies are the secondary evidences, if the primary exists, then the secondary would be invalid
2
-
2
-
@boatfloat1412 I'm basing my consideration of good leadership as a true democratic government. And I disagree with you this is because a democratic leadership hears it's people, and most Middle Easterns hate Israel to be honest
Most emiratis, saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians, Sudanese and Moroccans hate Israel, and they were forced to make deals with them, all of them are (unsurprisingly) under totalitarian or simply unlimited ruling system. And if a really democratic government came, it is a disaster, since these countries will experience high economic growth, along with their already high fertility rates.
Last time a real election happened, MB party won in Egypt, that promised to develop Egypt and liberate Palestine, only to be removed by a military coup that is ruling the country until today
2
-
1
-
1
-
@yvelf the facts? What are the facts? With all respect to Americans, you think that the US government is sending this aid to help Palestinians out of their goodness?! Only idiots think this way
The US government is sending this aid for 2 reasons
First, to help the PLO in crushing any future intifada or revolution and keep the government on American and Israeli side (why do you think the PLO is more tolerant to Israel than h@m@s?)
Second, to extend influence, as we can see how the PLO is integrating socially unaccepted educations, regardless of my personal views, like passive ideas to undermine resistance against colonialism, to normalize gender roles, feminism, and the numerous gender types, and many other public services being controlled
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Blah888 @Blah888 let's go again, my comment is being deleted, so I'll used wrong and twisted letters in some words. Like "f" means "v", ok 👍
1st, Muslims started to flow outside??? I think this is a language matter, not history
2nd, slafe industry?? Whatever, SLAfE TRADE to be honest with you, was even worse in india, just like how europeans called slaves "serfs", who were practically slafes.
And who said that slafery (we don't use this term Islamically, we use "riq", since we are all slafes of God) is the same everywhere? Slafery in Europe is human ownership often with no rights for slafes but life, slafery in islam is a mandated servitude with high protected rights, including 10 common rules for any slave to be free, other than the owner's permission. This is disregarding the fact that freeing a slafe is one of the most recommended things in islam, it's considered a charity. And even this slafery can happen only in certain ways, like we can't just take any weak person and call him a slafe, you actually have a whole set of rules of war to have rights over him, such as him being a prisoner of war or guilty of its crimes.
And finally, the indian economy didn't fall during mughal times, get your facts right. The indian economy's share of the global gdp started to fall for good.
First, the chinese economic growth was so great, and china reached its peak at the time with 35 percent of world's gdp.
Then, Europe, which was experiencing renaissance, then enlightenment, then industrial revolution, and let's not forget the colonisation of the Americas, which boosted their economies tremendously
And others, such as the Russian Empire, the ottoman empire, the persian empire, Africa's new empires rising, and so on and so forth.
So, the indian economy was doing great under muslim rule until the Europeans came, and the world was growing, which is a good thing. You want other peoples to starve?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1