Comments by "Omer عمر" (@Omer1996E.C) on "The Market Exit" channel.

  1. Hey Andres, alot of times when I'm scrolling on yt shorts and I see a very good short for a long form content, I stop doomscrolling and get into the long form. This is how I discovered Sarah Paine on the Dwarkesh Patel channel, and I watched many hours of her interviews and discussions, instead of doomscrolling on yt short. If you used yt short, you may also save some other doomscrollers into watching your long form content. Yt short is not necessarily an evil, it can be a way to enlightenment. Please, leverage your quality content with yt shorts. Plus, some people will just keep on doomscrolling anyway, right? So why don't you just let them know a useful information on their way, if they're not going to stop anyway? Saying this as fan of you. All the best ❤
    4
  2. Idk, I think you should hire a YouTube professional for a year, who'd help you make your videos and shorts go viral. You have so good content. Shame it's not going viral enough, your content quality is near PolyMatter.
    4
  3. I believe a big part of this is inequality, exposure and self comparison, which are all basically the same thing. As a person who lives in a 3rd world country, as it's called, I see that those who don't have Internet social medias are happier, those who don't live in the capital city (those who can't normally see the mansions and the slums) are happier and those who, even though they know inequality exists, they don't really feel/see it around them (like me) are happier. It's not about the existence of inequality, but that if you feel it or not. A rich society with less bragging is much happier than a rich one with more bragging/luxury. That's actually one of the reasons I support not taxing wealth, but taxing luxury and unutilized wealths
    4
  4. So, first, congrats on your first sponsor Second, I disagree with this concept of limitarianism. Because wealth is not mainly redistributed and limited, it's not like how the colonialists thought to justify their lootings. When someone "makes" money, it's most of the times value created, not redistributed. 1. So, if someone didn't make an Nvidia for us, it would've taken longer for another person to do it, if ever, so this billionaire is basically being rewarded for it. 2. Wealth inequality (not the current extreme) is also a way to re-allocate resources to their best investors, so instead of giving money to a person who can bring yearly 10% ROI, it should be given to that who can bring more ROIs, and in the case of musk, it's +100%. Third, should we have any right to limit others who are not committing any harm? If someone is more financially sound, should he be punished? At this point, it's not about wealth, but about the tyranny of majority
    2
  5. ​ @TheMarketExit  thanks for the compliment 😂 except that I'm a finance student, nothing to do with social media
    1
  6.  @oxfordsculler8013  yeah, his two controversial video were this one, and another that talks about immigrants, I personally liked the immigrant point, but many swedes didn't, as it goes against the mainstream narrative
    1
  7. Some countries tried to handout money, give free services, more parental leave and lower taxes, but to no avail. Taking an immigrant is much cheaper. You don't have to feed him baby milk, you don't have to give them a KG to High School education, and you actually put more regulations on them to ne be employed as early as possible, which makes them non tax payers as a result. The immigrant crisis is a populist crisis ​ @damonmelendez856 
    1