Comments by "One MercilessMing" (@onemercilessming1342) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

  1. Maya Yeel--It is, perhaps, so dangerous because Diana's death was all too "neat". INMO, Diana was killed to make way for Camilla so Charles, as a widower, would be able to succeed more easily than were he just a divorced man. It eliminated the possibility of Diana marrying and bearing other children to what was THEN called a "wog" (anyone whose skin was darker than an Anglo-Saxon's) and William and Harry having half-siblings (step-siblings, such as Camilla's children by Andrew Parker-Bowles was, apparently, acceptable) of darker hue and other national allegiances than the UK and British Commonwealth of Nations. What a pity that ER II wasted a presumed/alleged assassination on a woman who was far less dangerous than Rachel Meghan Markle.
    8
  2. What's next? World-wide oblivion, perhaps? We can only hope.
    7
  3. pj moseley--The have a right to be happy, yet. What they DON'T have a right to be is the cause of unhappiness to everyone around them.
    2
  4.  @matthewaddai5336 --YOU are sadly mistaken. Charles has NOT relinquished his right to succeed and I STRONGLY suggest you start reading some of the biographies on Charles, the Queen Mother, ER II, Diana, and also the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
    1