Comments by "" (@artstation707) on "Britain Must Wake Up in 2024" video.

Britain is separate from Europe, in terms of nationhood and race, regardless of cosmetic similarities. How so? Well, those considered British today inherited a unique identity, which is why Britishness must be preserved, even to the exclusion of EU passport holding Eastern Europeans. Contrary to your concerns about fairness, British culture derives from its ancient demographics, which we can restore with very little effort. Try to remember. Your ancestors fought to inherit Britain. You should fight to preserve that inheritance, as opposed to inviting in legal aliens and opportunists to siphon it off as remittance back to their lairs. Remember who Britain belongs to! EDIT: When I posted this message, the comment above it from "Jerryross7135" did not exist. It's a false message with a false number of hits.
36
@@Madie839 Native means a person born in a specified place or associated with a place by birth, whether subsequently resident. When you speak for native rights, you speak for everyone born in a country before large numbers of invaders arrive. The last mass invasion of Britain took place between 2003 and now. Britain will be preserved only by turning the clock back two decades, regardless who likes it or not.
15
@martinspedding4210 The UK is not part of Europe.
4
Reform is run by the same forces responsible for every administration.
3
@allenomalley4014 You did lose.
3
@greghill7759 We can't be too open on this platform. It finds ways to remove unsightly comments. All depends on what you believe. Some maintain links to things others dismiss, and so, one person's comprehension remains elusive to another. The many millions of EU Slavs who walked in "legally" from 2003 onward, were not looking for refuge, and they outnumber genuine asylum seekers--as incredible as this may sound: 100,000:1. Where's your justification for that?
3
@martinspedding4210 Europe is just a word describing a peninsular. Its original meaning might offend you. People, named after a piece of land, don't really have an identity. You should study history a bit more. The nations of Europe are "historically" the most diverse set of cultures on a single "continent."
2
This is the true consequence of rebellion. Your ancestors disposed of theocracy, replacing it with a free for all system giving power to peasants. What did you expect?
2
@VladTepes-SaviorofEurope-mw4uy Good for them.
2
@Hemswell Reform is a political party.
1
@martinspedding4210 I don't advocate Reform's policies, because for one thing, they're fake. Every promoted entity has backers who pull their strings. I want to see justice, and fairness. All the people from my generation and younger, who grew up in our country, thinking we had a future, deserve compensation for the theft of said futures, at the hands of MILLIONS of EU Slavs, who walked into our country "legally." This call for justice seems disgusting to you???? Perhaps you don't have a country of your own. Perhaps you're some kind of parasite. Perhaps that's why you think it's fair to allow MILLIONS of people to enter someone's place and steal what belongs to them.
1
@VladTepes-SaviorofEurope-mw4uy No such thing happened. Let's not get into that. Let's keep it civil.
1
@greghill7759 What amazes me most is the level to which some will go to get their hands on the loot. All this sophistry is about taking what does not belong to you, including identities. AFAIAC only two entities in this world have valid claims over it. In the pecking order, one has been allowed to replace the other. A third phenomenon assumed someone's titles and manifest destiny, fearful of a sub-faction, given license to carry forward promise. All other players vie for crumbs. Britain, once imbued with sanction to rule, became the target of every creeping thing desirous of that title. Now, for accommodating too many self-deluded parasites, for allowing them to remove her crown, she's come unstuck. She must do the right thing, or it's curtains, not only for her, but also for those counterfeits who (in their ridiculous quest for validation and godhood) destroy everything they touch. This is the way things are. You can't complain when people tell the absolute truth.
1
@greghill7759 You don't have the whole picture. People who leave Britain and travel see it. Those nations nurtured under aegis of other imposers lack order. It's palpable as a first impression. This goes beyond the remit of our discussion, but Britain, at least according to writers such as Gildas, Bede etc., already reaped what she'd sown, resulting in previous waves of usurpers entering to take possession. Rectifying this handicap produced the most successful national culture in history. I'm saying Empire was in some way sanctioned in order to preserve what was lost, and so covetous eyes and their agency, which foisted upon the world the antithesis of sanctioned order, should not be allowed to complete their goals and deprive inheritors of British identity and the sons of commonwealth what is rightfully theirs.
1
@greghill7759 If you're looking for official figures, you won't find them. Every government issued estimate on this will be false. I worked with the ONS in 2011 during the census that year, having to sign a NDA (Nondisclosure agreement). Extrapolating my own findings, taking population density of urban to rural areas into account, we arrived at 15 million EU migrants entering between 2003 and 2011. Every third door knocked contained EU migrants, mainly Polish, but a great deal of Hungarians, Romanians, and others. Whole families including grandparents simply walked in. It was either that or a house full of workers. Some of them couldn't speak English, but had young children who could. Many were afraid we'd deport them! They also occupied the best housing, as well as the worst. They were everywhere. It was shocking. Actual Brits, white and non-white, were livid. The government admits to just 3 million for the same period, five times less. Five -- times less. Here's a quote from 2007, putting things into their true perspective: "Consumption – that's the thing. Based on what we eat, one big supermarket chain reckons there are 80 million people living in the UK. The demand for food is a reliable indicator; as Sir Richard Branson says, you can have all the money in the world but you can only eat one lunch and one dinner. I have a second, respectable, source. A major, non-commercial agricultural institution reckons there are 77 million of us in the UK. Again, its reckoning is based on what we eat. City Eye: Facts on a plate: our population is at least 77 million Martin Baker Sunday 28 October 2007 " The current UK population is 67.33 million (2021) ...10 to 13 million people short of those estimates made 14 years prior. I would say my own estimate (15 million) isn't far off from where it would be three years ago. We know these are all EU Slavs, as they walked in at a rate of 1 million people per year by around 2007.
1
@notbaltic280 Cheddar Man is fiction, but the BBC has research teams who know a lot more about ancient British demographics than the average television viewer.
1
@janyb1907 They allowed Brexit; despite the media campaign for "Remain" and against "Leave" (an ironic inversion of meanings) the number of Britons prepared to vote against the establishment couldn't be controlled. They thought it would be close enough to switch the votes, but the true number opting for Brexit stunned them. Still, they believed their trump card would be EU Slav anchor babies who are coming of voting age right about now. So, unless something drastic happens to change the narrative, don't be surprised by the establishment's attempts to blame traditional commonwealth minorities for the overcrowding, even placing POC in high office, hoping you'll turn a blind xenophobic eye to the real problem, and end up with a mongrel "Slavish" population willing to rejoin the EU.
1
@phYT01 Those were not your ancestors. Furthermore, Europe is a Greek word describing phenomena to the west of what became Greece. Its true meaning is inconvenient. Toponyms, or place names, do not describe lineage or culture. Britain on the other hand is a patronym, or ancestral name; it derives from a Trojan called Brutus. Promotion of toponyms, such as Europe, Asia and Africa, mask true history, and invalidate national cultures, hoping to replace them with blanket racial terms. No such thing as a "European" exists because soil does not give birth to people; also, this word had a different meaning back in the day. Anyone calling themselves European has no identity.
1
@phYT01 Recoverable? If the population of illegal immigrants in Britain is 500,000 people, and you rustle up the resources to deport them all, you still have, by my estimate, over 10 million EU Slavs trying to hide in plain sight. How are you going to fix that? They had children, British-born. These will never support deportation of their own parents. How will you fix this???? The powers-that-be used your own prejudice against you, and are doing so right now. Their goal is to use those crypto-Slavs at the voting booth.
1
@Claudia-zv6sk Is this meant to be tongue-in-cheek?
1
@greghill7759 You can also use some common sense. From 1992 until 2003 Britain (having 10 million non-white citizens) was part of a free movement zone which consisted of 12 Western European nations. No one complained or demanded a referendum on leaving the EU. She even took in Yugoslav refugees in significant numbers. No one complained. What happened between 2003 and 2016 when long overdue calls for that vote were satisfied? With the accession of Eastern European nations to the EU in 2001, and later years, and with subsequent treaties allowing their free movement zone to overlap with the existing one, Eastern Europe could migrate west, legally, without limits imposed on them by destination countries. Britain placed no limits on EU migration during the two subsequent decades.
1
@phYT01 That's a fantastic question, although the answer isn't relevant to our discussion. You're here now. We have to work with what we have -- to see what's salvageable.
1
@greghill7759 So. You accept official government published figures only? I'm telling you why Britain rejected your European project. The UK is not a theme park. It's not a bank for you to rob!!! It's a place where people are born, brought up, schooled, and where they develop expectations about their futures. No one should have woken up one day to find signage written in Polish, or have every person knocking their door, selling insurance or whatever, barely capable of speaking English, or to find employment as an unpaid temporary worker, in their own hometown, in what was once called British Home Stores, supervised and managed by disparaging people all born in Poland!!! We had a reasonable, decent social safety net, which is gone now, because many millions of opportunists born to our east just walked in. If it's any consolation, immigration is important. We do need immigrants, but 15 MILLION PEOPLE in 20 years, all "legal" via a legal loophole???? That's a third of the original population! Given the opportunity, no one in their right mind would have condoned this. You can't justify the despicable sleight of hand used to fool the British people into committing suicide! And all this for what? So that a few pathologically greedy opportunists could extract as many resources as possible from this country, using cheap skilled workers??? You should be ashamed to defend this.
1
@greghill7759 If you're looking for official figures, you won't find them. Every government issued estimate on this will be false. I worked with the ONS in 2011 during the census that year, having to sign a NDA (Nondisclosure agreement). Extrapolating my own findings, taking population density of urban to rural areas into account, we arrived at 15 million EU migrants entering between 2003 and 2011. Every third door knocked contained EU migrants, mainly Polish, but a great deal of Hungarians, Romanians, and others. Whole families including grandparents simply walked in. It was either that or a house full of workers. Some of them couldn't speak English, but had young children who could. Many were afraid we'd deport them! They also occupied the best housing, as well as the worst. They were everywhere. It was shocking. Actual Brits, white and non-white, were livid. The government admits to just 3 million for the same period, five times less. Five -- times less. Here's a quote from 2007, putting things into their true perspective: "Consumption – that's the thing. Based on what we eat, one big supermarket chain reckons there are 80 million people living in the UK. The demand for food is a reliable indicator; as Sir Richard Branson says, you can have all the money in the world but you can only eat one lunch and one dinner. I have a second, respectable, source. A major, non-commercial agricultural institution reckons there are 77 million of us in the UK. Again, its reckoning is based on what we eat. City Eye: Facts on a plate: our population is at least 77 million Martin Baker Sunday 28 October 2007 " The current UK population is 67.33 million (2021) ...10 to 13 million people short of those estimates made 14 years prior. I would say my own estimate (15 million) isn't far off from where it would be three years ago. We know these are all EU Slavs, as they walked in at a rate of 1 million people per year by around 2007. (REPOST)
1
@greghill7759 So. You accept official government published figures only? I'm telling you why Britain rejected your European project. The UK is not a theme park. It's not a bank for you to rob!!! It's a place where people are born, brought up, schooled, and where they develop expectations about their futures. No one should have woken up one day to find signage written in Polish, or have every person knocking their door, selling insurance or whatever, barely capable of speaking English, or to find employment as an unpaid temporary worker, in their own hometown, in what was once called British Home Stores, supervised and managed by disparaging people all born in Poland!!! We had a reasonable, decent social safety net, which is gone now, because many millions of opportunists born to our east just walked in. If it's any consolation, immigration is important. We do need immigrants, but 15 MILLION PEOPLE in 20 years, all "legal" via a legal loophole???? That's a third of the original population! Given the opportunity, no one in their right mind would have condoned this. You can't justify the despicable sleight of hand used to fool the British people into committing suicide! And all this for what? So that a few pathologically greedy opportunists could extract as many resources as possible from this country, using cheap skilled workers??? You should be ashamed to defend this. (REPOST)
1