Comments by "Night Raven" (@GiRR007) on "Monsieur Z" channel.

Because the country is too big, the concept of the federal government having such control over the entire population's daily lives is an absurd thought. There's a reason it's 50 states.
126
Project 2025 actually looks pretty great. Every time someone brings it up and describes whats it is basically all of it sounds good.
38
We have always been divided. Its 50 separate states.
29
 @gustavofring5674 I've had liberals read it to me NUMEROUS times and even with their EXTREME bias against it they make it sound great to me.
23
@PeruvianPotato Places with totalitarian dictatorial governments? Yeah GREAT examples those are for a country founded on the concept of individual freedom.
20
@oberonpanopticon I very much doubt you know what human rights are.
17
@theamazinggarbage3209 It shouldn't exist as it currently does. Its currently in a pathetic state. The united states existed without a strong central government for like half of its existence and was doing well.
9
Communism liberal policies focus on the classes of wealth. In this it is very much based on liberal ideology. Mean whole the US view point on class was conservative as it did not want this new way of class and economic distinction.
6
Just kinda sounds like gang warfare which we are used to already.
3
But who decides is the problem. You will never get someone who can accurately AND without bias restructure these borders. In reality its the people that need to change and move, not the borders.
2
The cure is a frame work for whatever country you live in that dictates immutable traits that the country has, such as the constitution for the US. Or relegion.
2
while it is true that there are more guns than people the majority of the weapons are own by a minority, Some gun owners own multiple guns and that's why its only 50% .
2
How did this obsession with democracy take hold in American politics in the first place...
2
Id prefer to keep the 50 instead of 80.
2
republicans hold a vast majority of the fire arms in the US population
1
The number of republicans pretty much equal the number of demo crats, the republicans are just spread out over a larger area. Population "strong holds" wont be very strong after a lot of the resources that come from republican lands gets cut off. Most democrats don't practice armed combat, very few demo crats even own guns compared to republicans so the republicans would definitely be more adapted at using their weapons. Democrat cities may be more educated but in the context of war it wont matter how book smart you are so most of their education will be useless in this circumstance. Israel would very much lean right considering it was the right that encouraged making Jerusalem the capital of Israel while the democrats didn't. but most nations would stay out of it. At most you would get some trades being halted during the war.
1
taake me hoooome
1
It was the republicans that endorsed making Jerusalem the capital of Israel not the democrats.
1
you must be one of those people who confuse liberals with libertarians libertarians are more similar to republicans than they are democrats
1
@PeruvianPotato The comparison to totalitarian country's further proves my point. The only ones who get up set over federalism are the ones that want control what other people do. People should keep THEIR "common sense" to themselves. Its none of my buissness.
1
@PeruvianPotato The using of totalitarian country's as an example further proves my point. The only people who get upset at the idea of federalism are those who are totalitarians themselves, those who just want to control other people. They can keep THEIR "common sense" to themselves, it has nothing to do with other people.
1
@PeruvianPotato it keeps deleting this comment for some reason but Usage of totalitarian country's as an example further proves my point. The only ones who get upset at the idea of states being prioritized of the federal government are totalitarians themselves.
1
@PeruvianPotato it suspiciously keeps deleting my replies to you...
1
@theamazinggarbage3209 This is PATENTLY untrue. A totalitarian government is in NO WAY comparable to just a weak government. Government being weak is objectively a good thing. The less power a government has over people the better. It didn't even give structure, structure was something that existed even before the government grew to what it is.
1
Russia: Now this looks like a job for me
1
@oberonpanopticon If they are just as social construct then they don't mean anything and your argument is pointless. Good thing for me they aren't social constructs but inalienable natural part of existence that all humans have.
1
@oberonpanopticon YouTube deleted my previous comment so I'm gonna have to word this differently. If rights are just a social construct then your argument falls apart and doesn't mean anything. Good thing they aren't a social construct.
1
@pizzaburger9928 examples ? No republican goes around every where claiming everything is racist ect. That is strictly a liberal thought process. Mean while it is VERY well document of liberals doing such things.
1
Wind Rose but it was the republican party that freed the slaves, and the democratic party that wanted them to stay slaves, also it was the democratic party that forced the black community onto welfare thus severely hampering their ability to progress economically. Democrats have wayy more racist than republicans ever have XD
1
@SlayingSin dude literally look it up on google of all fucking places, black people vote a VAST majority democrat .
1
Wind Rose Who says they ever switched ,because the democrats now are just as racist.
1
Wind Rose There is never a clear answer or reason that would point to an actual switch of the party in history.
1
we arent a democracy we are a republic
1
they do sound really similar right ?
1