Comments by "Night Raven" (@GiRR007) on "The Medical Impacts of Overturning Roe v. Wade" video.

  1. The family didnt consent to putting their loved one in a coma in the first place and also dont have an exact date for when coma patient will wake up, both of which don't apply to pregnancys.
    3
  2.  @shookbrii  I want women to not kill unborn kids and be more responsible. You make it sound like the woman didn't consent to the interaction.
    3
  3.  @JD-wu5pf  People being fat doesn't kill other people, its something that only hurts themselves unlike abortions. Again killing others isnt a right anyone has.
    3
  4. Some people cant be rehabilitated and frankly its not meant to punish people its meant to punish them and deter others from commiting the same crimes, it's to set an example for others thus helping in reducing crime. Like jesus imagine hi much worse crime would be if people though all they had to do was get "rehabilitated" afterwards.
    2
  5. The evil intent of wanting to protect the lives of unborn children? Killing someone isnt a human right.
    2
  6.  @anvisriva1824  This is not the same, it would be more similar to someone wanted to retake their donated kidney after already having donated and having it installed into another person already and doing so being gurenteed to end that persons life. The woman agreed to the pregnancy when she accepted sex .
    2
  7. Some lile 90% of abortions arent even sue to medical nessicty like them being a danger to the mothers life, 90% are simply out of convience, basically using abortions as a form of birth control. Its sad
    2
  8. It will increase unsafe abortions but will also decrease abortions over all so its still achieving the goal of saving lives.
    2
  9. That doesnt matter since like 90% of abortions are performed out of convenience, nessecity of the child being a danger to the mother.
    1
  10. If they could provide for a child why were they fucking in the first place? If not having a kid was truly a priority for them they would have taken the nessecary procaution of simply not have sex. They didn't care, this is all just the avoidance of personal responsibility.
    1
  11.  @shookbrii  Yes pregnancy's do indeed have exact dates as well as being basically guaranteed to succeed, Just because three is a slight variation or just because SOMETIMES accidents happen during a pregnacny doesn't make those events the rule, they are exceptions, extremes.
    1
  12.  @JD-wu5pf  If they consented to sex the consented to getting pregnant.
    1
  13.  @JD-wu5pf  And those same people know that said protection is not 100% effective and yet choose to have sex anyway, thus they are still consenting to pregnancy. They knew they risk and proceeded. Car accidents aren't the logical conclusion to driving as sex is to pregnancy, and also car accidents inherently are a direct threat to said persons life where a pregnancy is not.
    1
  14.  @shookbrii  Those people are already punished though... if you smoke you destroy your lungs and if you drink you destroy your liver and if you drink and drive and kill someone its all on you. There are some places you are not allowed to smoke, and there are some places you are not allowed to drink. Compared to abortions were the only person suffering consequences for the womans actions is her child. And its not even fair in the first place, its not like men can get abortions or force women to get them, so what if the man doesn't want the child? He cant just leave because he has to pay child support and if he DOESNT he goes to jail, its literally only women for some reason that get to decide that they can take another persons life. So yes im a bit peved that a certain subsect of the population gets to avoid consequences for their actions.
    1
  15.  @shookbrii  yes it is very much an extreme scenerio, 10% of the time is very much what we consider extreme, and its not suppose to happen, not to mention that if the mother is being careful the chance of miscarriage drops as well.
    1
  16. You realise that's not how miscarriages work right?
    1
  17.  @anythingspossible1  no accidental is not a valid reason because no one forced the woman to get pregnant, she accepted the risk of getting pregnant when she had sex.
    1
  18.  @anythingspossible1  Yes they are indeed a human life at conception. It is already the scientific consensus that life starts at conception. And yeah sure sex CAN be for more than reproduction but people now seem to be completely unconcerned with the natural risk that come with sex. But logically the only reason in nature the only reason for sex is reproduction thus people should, i don't know, maybe be a bit more responcible for the actions they take?
    1
  19.  @anythingspossible1  Its not potential human life its inevitable human life. The potential was used up at conception. After that an automatic process begins. The mother already made her choice and the end result of the pregnancy isn't her death where as abortions ALWAYS result in the death of the child. Making abortions illegal may put lives at risk but will still reduce the over all number of abortions so the goal is still accomplished. And yet again no one is forcing women to give birth they made that decision themselves when they decided to get have sex and get pregnant. If the woman wasnt prepared to have a child she should and should have tried harder to not get pregnant. Age didnt, thus pregnancy is the result, actions have consequences and people should take responcibility for those actions instead of trying to evade them. My morals are fine, I'm not the one killing kids.
    1
  20.  @barbarareichart267  Main point, sex is mostly for reproduction. Any entertainment derived is secondary as its simply natures way of encouraging reproduction. And naturally animals don't even really think about what they are doing, they are just biologically programed to perform the action compared humans that put more thought into certain biologically imperative task.
    1
  21.  @awesomedietcoke  for what
    1
  22.  @barbarareichart267  It exist but in the common era it has been WILDLY missused and and thus people have become very irresponsible. We dont have to be completely against sex outside the concept of reproduction but we've gone to far in the direction of treating it as some just casual experience and the population has thus suffered for it.
    1
  23.  @raapyna8544  Yes humans are very much fundamentally different between different countries. Thats like the entire reason we have different countries at all. Countries naturally develop different societies and cultures. The countries you are referring to are vastly different, the people from said countries are vastly different. So for America focusing on rehabilitation wouldn't work. Just like trying to directly import other social systems from other countries dont work in the US like universal health care, free college, ect. Thus the United States focuses on penalty to deter others from commiting similar crimes. Not that the system is perfect it definitely has its own flaws but its what works best for America.
    1
  24. Difference is you are talking about making something which is already illegal simply more illegal with guns. But with abortions being already entirely legal making them illegal will definitely reduce the number.
    1
  25.  @RLRoxy  killing people with guns is.
    1
  26.  @RLRoxy  You realize the country was founded on religion right? And abortion isnt a religion issue anyway its a human life issue.
    1
  27.  @RLRoxy  literally all of it? The entire idea of god given rights which the government cant infringe upon, one nation under God, all of it... XD
    1
  28. No one has the right to kill someone else. This will stop ALOT of abortions, theyll still happen but at least it will reduce the number thus saving lives. No one is forcing women to give birth, the woman accepted pregnancy when she had sex, if she truly wanted to 100% avoid getting pregnant then she would have simply not had sex. Killing kids is wrong, thats it.
    1
  29. Its weird that someone can be charged with double homicide if they KILL a pregnant woman but the woman can still kill something that is lawfully recognized as a human life.
    1
  30.  @Dimitri791  abortions that are the result of sexual assault dont even make up 1% of abortions cases. 90% of abortions cases are out of convenience rather than need. So how about this, if we make all other abortions illegal except for ones involving rape,incest,and the pregnancy threatening her life, then would you be fine with that? No ? Then you don't actually care about those women who were actual victims of such things your just using them as a tool.
    1
  31.  @NexLegacyAccount  killing some one else isn't a right anyone has so no its not something that should be federal.
    1
  32.  @NexLegacyAccount  Well apparently not considering its legal to murder unborn kids still.
    1
  33. No one is forcing anyone to give birth, the women choose to hey pregnant, they are just being stopped from killing unborn babys. This isnt a bodily autonomy problem as the child inside isn't part of the womans body, it has its own body.
    1
  34.  @natek987  Sex end usually ends up increases promiscuity between teens which is undesirable.
    1
  35.  @natek987  No they very much do not.
    1
  36.  @angelaschone2847  Yes it is. That is the natural result of having sex. You know the risk of having the kid when you have sex. And you are accepting those risk and doing it anyway. The end.
    1
  37. ​ @angelaschone2847  Irrelevant of what people do it for that it is ALWAYS at risk of happening and people know that and decide to have sex anyway so YES they are consenting to getting pregnant. Consent to the risk means consent to pregnancy. Pregnancy is the risk.
    1
  38.  @angelaschone2847  Yes it is consent to it happening. Just because you don't want something to happen doesn't mean you didn't consent to it. Because there DOES exist a completely fool proof way to not get pregnant no matter what already, is not having sex. The consent is given along with the consent to sex.
    1
  39. So we should just kill people because they might end up homeless or MIGHT become criminals? That sounds barbaric, would probably deter homelessness though.
    1
  40. What does abortion have to do with women's rights or bodily autonomy? The fetus isnt part of a woman's body it is its own body, a woman does grow an extra 10 fingers and 10 toes and extra organs when shes pregnant. And none has the right to kill another person simply out of convience.
    1
  41. Sprint back to not killing unborn kids?
    1
  42.  @rainbowwigglecactus6605  fetuses aren't part of women's bodys they are a separate body.
    1
  43.  @rainbowwigglecactus6605  Stop making birthing so so truamatizing its literally where everyone mammal on earth came from, some women even have multiple kids. People can already decide it something they want to go through or not, its called not getting pregnant in the first place. The ability to kill someone else for their convience however is not a choice they should have. The woman alreayd made the choice to get pregnant, so at the very least she shouldnt be able to just up and kill the child she agreed to have out of convience. Even if the adoption system was bad we dont kill people just because they might end up poor... Womens rights end where the rights of unborn children begin.
    1
  44. Something not having a brain doesn't mean it isnt alive. And its not like the unborn dont get a brain or something.
    1
  45. Not really as 90% of abortions are done out of convenience, not out of medical nessecity like the pregnancy being a danger to the woman's health.
    1
  46.  @georgecampbell9190  Other forms of sex ed at least the ones in the US end up increasing teen promiscuity which is very much undesired.
    1