Youtube comments of Night Raven (@GiRR007).

  1. 23000
  2. 4700
  3. 2300
  4. 1300
  5. 837
  6. 687
  7. 479
  8. 470
  9. 436
  10. 312
  11. 271
  12. 228
  13. 201
  14. 201
  15. 164
  16. 162
  17. 145
  18. 140
  19. 138
  20. 131
  21. 126
  22. 116
  23. 111
  24. 108
  25. 106
  26. 106
  27. 103
  28. 102
  29. 100
  30. 96
  31. 93
  32. The US is larger and less culturally homogenous than Switzerland as well as just having more crime in general. America is a more individualistic and liberty driven society compared to Switzerland which is more communal and less focused on individual libertys. So regardless if the country had guns or not its crime rate would still be much higher because of its cultural values. The USA prioritizes personal liberty above ALL ELSE thus is willing to put up with the consequences of that. ie inequality (which leads to crime) and less safety. As Benjamin Franklin so succinctly puts the idea "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety". It was never just outside invasion or internal insurrections that guns were meant to be used for in America, but also AGAINTS the American government ITSELF in the case that it turned tyrannical. Just like the country the USA fought so hard to break away from, Britain. After having experienced British tyranny for so long the founders made sure to design the country so that it would be neigh impossible for a tyrannical government to gain power in America in the first place. Thus the government telling civilians what to do with THEIR property and forcing them to participate in compulsory military service is fundamentally anti-american. Most guns in America ARE used to protect people. The Department of Justice has stated that there are approximately 1.5 MILLION defensive uses of fire arms in America PER YEAR. This FAR exceeds the amount of people harmed by guns which as you said are majoritively suicides anyway. And that 1.5 million includes cases where no one is even shot, just having the weapon drawn being enough to deter an attacker.
    87
  33. 85
  34. 84
  35. 78
  36. 77
  37. 75
  38. 73
  39. 73
  40. 71
  41. 71
  42. 69
  43. 65
  44. 63
  45. 57
  46. 57
  47. 53
  48. 51
  49. 49
  50. 47
  51. 46
  52. 46
  53. 45
  54. 43
  55. 42
  56. 42
  57. 42
  58. 39
  59. 38
  60. 38
  61. 38
  62. 38
  63. 37
  64. 36
  65. 34
  66. 34
  67. 34
  68. 34
  69. 33
  70. 33
  71. 33
  72. 32
  73. 32
  74. 31
  75. 31
  76. 31
  77. 30
  78. 30
  79. 30
  80. 29
  81. 29
  82. 29
  83. 29
  84. 29
  85. 29
  86. 29
  87. 28
  88. 28
  89. 28
  90. 28
  91. 28
  92. 27
  93. 26
  94. 26
  95. 26
  96. 26
  97. 25
  98. 25
  99. 25
  100. 25
  101. 24
  102. 24
  103. 24
  104. 23
  105. 23
  106. 23
  107. 23
  108. 22
  109. 22
  110. 22
  111. 21
  112. 21
  113. 21
  114. 21
  115. 21
  116. 21
  117. 20
  118. 20
  119. 20
  120. 20
  121. 20
  122. 20
  123. 20
  124. 20
  125. 20
  126. 19
  127. 19
  128. 19
  129. 18
  130. 18
  131. 18
  132. 18
  133. 18
  134. 18
  135. 18
  136. 18
  137. 18
  138. 18
  139. 18
  140. 17
  141. 17
  142. 17
  143. 17
  144. 17
  145. 17
  146. 17
  147. 17
  148. 17
  149. 17
  150. 17
  151. 17
  152. 17
  153. 16
  154. 16
  155. 16
  156. 16
  157. 16
  158. 16
  159. 16
  160. 16
  161. 16
  162. 15
  163. 15
  164. 15
  165. 15
  166. 15
  167. 15
  168. 15
  169. 15
  170. 15
  171. 15
  172. 15
  173. 15
  174. 14
  175. 14
  176. 14
  177. 14
  178. 14
  179. 14
  180. 14
  181. 14
  182. 14
  183. 14
  184. 13
  185. 13
  186. 13
  187. 13
  188. 13
  189. 13
  190. 13
  191. 13
  192. 13
  193. 13
  194. 13
  195. 13
  196. 13
  197. 13
  198. 13
  199. 13
  200. 12
  201. 12
  202. 12
  203. 12
  204. 12
  205. 12
  206. 12
  207. 12
  208. 12
  209. 12
  210. 12
  211. 12
  212. 12
  213. 12
  214. 11
  215. 11
  216. 11
  217. 11
  218. 11
  219. 11
  220. 11
  221. 11
  222. 11
  223. 11
  224. 11
  225. 11
  226. 11
  227. 11
  228. 11
  229. 11
  230. 11
  231. 11
  232. 11
  233. 11
  234. 11
  235. 11
  236. 11
  237. 11
  238. 11
  239. 10
  240. 10
  241. 10
  242. 10
  243. 10
  244. 10
  245. 10
  246. 10
  247. 10
  248. 10
  249. 10
  250. 10
  251. 10
  252. 10
  253. 10
  254. 10
  255. 10
  256. 10
  257. 10
  258. 10
  259. 10
  260. 10
  261. 10
  262. 10
  263. 10
  264. 10
  265. 10
  266. 9
  267. 9
  268. 9
  269. 9
  270. 9
  271. 9
  272. 9
  273. 9
  274. 9
  275. 9
  276. 9
  277. 9
  278. 9
  279. 9
  280. 9
  281. 9
  282. 9
  283. 9
  284. 9
  285. 9
  286. 9
  287. 9
  288. 9
  289. 9
  290. 9
  291. 9
  292. 9
  293. 9
  294. 8
  295. 8
  296. 8
  297. 8
  298. 8
  299. 8
  300. 8
  301. 8
  302. 8
  303. 8
  304. 8
  305. 8
  306. 8
  307. 8
  308. 8
  309. 8
  310. 8
  311. 8
  312. 8
  313. 8
  314. 8
  315. 8
  316. 8
  317. 8
  318. 8
  319. 8
  320. 8
  321. 8
  322. 8
  323. 8
  324. 8
  325. 8
  326. 8
  327. 8
  328. 8
  329. 8
  330. 8
  331. 8
  332. 8
  333. 8
  334. 8
  335. 8
  336. 8
  337. 7
  338. 7
  339. 7
  340. 7
  341. 7
  342. 7
  343. 7
  344. 7
  345. 7
  346. 7
  347. 7
  348. 7
  349. 7
  350. 7
  351. 7
  352. 7
  353. 7
  354. 7
  355. 7
  356. 7
  357. 7
  358. 7
  359. 7
  360. 7
  361. 7
  362. 7
  363. 7
  364. 7
  365. 7
  366. 7
  367. 7
  368. 7
  369. 7
  370. 7
  371. 7
  372. 7
  373. 7
  374. 7
  375. 7
  376. 7
  377. 7
  378. 7
  379. 7
  380. 7
  381. 7
  382. 7
  383. 7
  384. 7
  385. 7
  386. 7
  387.  @macjaa  You took a long and overly complicated way around to say that he does blame capitalism for oppressing poor people. He may not ONLY blamed capitalism for this but that was never the claim anyway, althiest never claimed marx ONLY blamed capitalism. His beliefs WERE founded on the concept of "rich oppressing poor". Aka the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and proletariat, owners and works, rich and poor. This is just a game of semantics at this point. Not actually substantial refutation of any such mispresented beliefs. "improvement of life in western europe was not simply because capitalism" althiest never said it was ONLY because of capitalism, however it was MOSTLY because of capitalism that living conditions improved. That is undeniable. Marx may have never OUT RIGHT stated he hated the bourgeoisie but it you actually read into how he depicts them and what he says about them its VERY clear he does and you would have to be giving a DISENGENOUSLY generous interpretation to his states to arrive at the conclusion he didnt hate them when all his writings point to him hating them. You are not extrapolating the logical conclusions of marxes writings and instead interpreting an overly charitable view of his statements because of your own bias towards him. Marx himself wrote it so obviously there is going to be a massive bias within his own writings. Its like reading Mein kaph and believing everything thats written inside is a fact. Communism is Marxism realized and taken to its logical conclusion in the real world so the are for all intents and purposes the same.
    7
  388. 7
  389. 7
  390. 7
  391. 7
  392. 7
  393. 7
  394. 7
  395. 7
  396. 7
  397. 7
  398. 7
  399. 7
  400. 7
  401. 6
  402. 6
  403. 6
  404. 6
  405. 6
  406. 6
  407. 6
  408. 6
  409. 6
  410. 6
  411. 6
  412. 6
  413. 6
  414. 6
  415. 6
  416. 6
  417. 6
  418. 6
  419. 6
  420. 6
  421. 6
  422. 6
  423. 6
  424. 6
  425. 6
  426. 6
  427. 6
  428. 6
  429. 6
  430. 6
  431. 6
  432. 6
  433. 6
  434. 6
  435. 6
  436. 6
  437. 6
  438. 6
  439. 6
  440. 6
  441. 6
  442. 6
  443. 6
  444. 6
  445. 6
  446. 6
  447. 6
  448. 6
  449. 6
  450. 6
  451. 6
  452. 6
  453. 6
  454. 6
  455. 6
  456. 6
  457. 6
  458. 6
  459. 6
  460. 6
  461. 6
  462. 6
  463. 6
  464. 6
  465. 6
  466. 6
  467. 6
  468. 6
  469. 6
  470. 6
  471. 6
  472. 5
  473. 5
  474. 5
  475. 5
  476. 5
  477. 5
  478. 5
  479. 5
  480. 5
  481. 5
  482. 5
  483. 5
  484. 5
  485. 5
  486. 5
  487. 5
  488. 5
  489. 5
  490. 5
  491. 5
  492. 5
  493. 5
  494. 5
  495. 5
  496. 5
  497. 5
  498. 5
  499. 5
  500. 5
  501. 5
  502. 5
  503. 5
  504. 5
  505. 5
  506. 5
  507. 5
  508. 5
  509. 5
  510. 5
  511. 5
  512. 5
  513. 5
  514. 5
  515. 5
  516. 5
  517. 5
  518. 5
  519. 5
  520. 5
  521. 5
  522. 5
  523. 5
  524. 5
  525. 5
  526. 5
  527. 5
  528. 5
  529. 5
  530. 5
  531. 5
  532. 5
  533. 5
  534. 5
  535. 5
  536. 5
  537. 5
  538. 5
  539. 5
  540. 5
  541. 5
  542. 5
  543. 5
  544. 5
  545. 5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. 5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 4
  557. 4
  558. 4
  559. 4
  560. 4
  561. 4
  562. 4
  563. 4
  564. 4
  565. 4
  566. 4
  567. 4
  568. 4
  569. 4
  570. 4
  571. 4
  572. 4
  573. 4
  574. 4
  575. 4
  576. 4
  577. 4
  578. 4
  579. 4
  580. 4
  581. 4
  582. 4
  583. 4
  584. 4
  585. 4
  586. 4
  587. 4
  588. 4
  589. 4
  590. 4
  591. 4
  592. 4
  593. 4
  594. 4
  595. 4
  596. 4
  597. 4
  598. 4
  599. 4
  600. 4
  601. 4
  602. 4
  603. 4
  604. 4
  605. 4
  606. 4
  607. 4
  608. 4
  609. 4
  610. 4
  611. 4
  612. 4
  613. 4
  614. 4
  615. 4
  616. 4
  617. 4
  618. 4
  619. 4
  620. 4
  621. 4
  622. 4
  623. 4
  624. 4
  625. 4
  626. 4
  627. 4
  628. 4
  629. 4
  630. 4
  631. 4
  632. 4
  633. 4
  634. 4
  635. 4
  636. 4
  637. 4
  638. 4
  639. 4
  640. 4
  641. 4
  642. 4
  643. 4
  644. 4
  645. 4
  646. 4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. 4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657. 4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. 4
  663. 4
  664. 4
  665. 4
  666. 4
  667. 4
  668. 4
  669. 4
  670. 4
  671. 4
  672. 4
  673. 4
  674. 4
  675. 4
  676. 4
  677. 4
  678. 4
  679. 4
  680. 4
  681. 4
  682. 4
  683. 4
  684. 4
  685. 4
  686. 4
  687. 4
  688. 4
  689. 4
  690. 4
  691. 4
  692. 4
  693.  @nachfullbarertrank5230  2:20 It is very disingenuous to call a non-disclosure agreement…hush money. Non-disclosure agreements are not illegal or else literally thousands businesses in the United States would be dissolved by now. 2:30 Do you have any evidence that Micheal Cohen did all of those things under the command of the president? And specifically in regards to contributing to a presidential campaign as it is not illegal to make campaign contributions unless you are from another country. Let alone establishing intent to sabotage a rival’s campaign is very shaky. Especially considering that third parties have reportedly spied on trumps campaign. Where is the rule of law in those cases? 3:06 Trump didn't try to use that money to bribe anyone, that money was already going to Ukraine and trump simply talked to the Ukrainian president in a request to investigate reports of corruption which is not illegal. If you actually cared about or rule of law you would endorse trump trying to investigate claims of corruption. Especially since we now know that Joe Biden's son Hunter has been actually PROVEN to have taken money from certain Russian officials. Joe Biden also had influence in the Ukrainian government as he handled relations with Ukraine during Obamas presidency, under which time Hunter Biden was receive a large amount of funding for working as a board director for a Ukrainian-owned private energy company despite him not having required qualifications for said position. So it seems as if said investigations were well warranted. Very convenient to bring this topic of corruption up now even after we know for a fact know that Hunter Biden is involved with some corruption involving the Russian government. There were no threats of withholding funding. Even if it Trump definitively stated that he was going to of withhold funds from the Ukrainian government in exchange for aid in an investigation involving corruption with the previous administration doing so is completely within the president of the United States power if he believes it to be necessary to get rid of corruption. That is common practice in international politics; Countries can withhold funds from others for political gain. This includes such things as trade tariffs, taxing certain goods, and yes withholding funding. It was not a bribe, it was not black mail, there was and still is no evidence of such things and again even if there were any declarations of financial withholdings those claims wouldn't even fit the definition of a bribe in this context. Not even the U.S. senate had any evidence of bribes or blackmail hence why Trump was acquitted from those slanderous accusations. 3:33 The "whistle blower" lied about the contents on the Trumps call with the Ukrainian president, not only that but the whistle blower was also dangerously close to espionage while in the process of gaining said information. This wouldn’t be new since we know there have been cases of GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS spying on trumps campaign before, which you touch upon later. So yes the “whistle blower” deserves to be punished for this. There was no evidence of Trump having actually committed any of the crimes he was accused of like bribery or blackmail and thus he was acquitted as our legal system demands. You are the one who strangely who wants to twist what our legal system represents to fit your own agenda. It’s innocent until proven guilty for a reason. If you actually respected our rule of law you surly wouldn’t deny this fact. 4:39 The F.B.I. director should have been fired because he colluded with the previously Obama administration to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. Compare that to Trump who we now know never colluded with Russia just as he claimed from the start. You have no evidence that the trump foundation solicit illegal hacking for their personal gain or a political rival’s downfall. Not only that but he has also put into action several orders in regards to Russia’s involvement in international affairs in relation to other countries militaries. 6:35 Trump himself said that his bank account in china is old and had been shut down before he even became president in the most recent debate. Again not to mention Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden actually has recently been proven to have taken money from Russian officials for as of yet undisclosed reasons. 6:55 Trump had every right to disperse those protestors, there are limits to how people can protest and, blocking access to or from a government building is one of those limits. They shouldn’t have been protesting there in the first place. 7:02 On a whim?! People were being killed and buildings were being burned down and you call that on a whim?! There were full blown riots happening in those cities, and so the Mayors of those cities’ asked the president for aid in quelling the civil anarchy. The National Guard was sent in to regain control and order in the city as any president is well within their rights to do. How can you be so disingenuous as to say that it was on a whim? 8:06 What trump says in a private conversation 15 ago with his friends in a situation where he doesn’t know that he is being recorded is far from an admission of sexual assault. You don’t know if it was actually true or just simple posturing between male friends in a private setting. Sure it’s a raunchy thing to say; you can even call him an asshole for saying it. But that is not an admission of sexual assault. You know as well as I do a statement under conditions like those would NEVER hold up in court.
    4
  694. 4
  695. 4
  696. 4
  697. 4
  698. 4
  699. 4
  700. 4
  701. 4
  702. 4
  703. 4
  704. 4
  705. 4
  706. 4
  707.  @dcgreenspro  2:20 It is very disingenuous to call a non-disclosure agreement…hush money. Non-disclosure agreements are not illegal or else literally thousands businesses in the United States would be dissolved by now. 2:30 Was there any hard evidence that Micheal Cohen did all of those things under the command of the president? And specifically in regards to contributing to a presidential campaign as it is not illegal to make campaign contributions unless you are from another country. Let alone establishing intent to sabotage a rival’s campaign is very shaky. Especially considering that third parties have reportedly spied on trumps campaign. Where is the rule of law in those cases? 3:06 Trump didn't try to use that money to bribe anyone, that money was already going to Ukraine and trump simply talked to the Ukrainian president in a request to investigate reports of corruption which is not illegal. If you actually cared about or rule of law you would endorse trump trying to investigate claims of corruption. Especially since we now know that Joe Biden's son Hunter has been actually PROVEN to have taken money from certain Russian officials. Joe Biden also had influence in the Ukrainian government as he handled relations with Ukraine during Obamas presidency, under which time Hunter Biden was receive a large amount of funding for working as a board director for a Ukrainian-owned private energy company despite him not having required qualifications for said position. So it seems as if said investigations were well warranted. Very convenient to bring this topic of corruption up now even after we know for a fact know that Hunter Biden is involved with some corruption involving the Russian government. There were no threats of withholding funding. Even if it Trump definitively stated that he was going to of withhold funds from the Ukrainian government in exchange for aid in an investigation involving corruption with the previous administration doing so is completely within the president of the United States power if he believes it to be necessary to get rid of corruption. That is common practice in international politics; Countries can withhold funds from others for political gain. This includes such things as trade tariffs, taxing certain goods, and yes withholding funding. It was not a bribe, it was not black mail, there was and still is no evidence of such things and again even if there were any declarations of financial withholdings those claims wouldn't even fit the definition of a bribe in this context. Not even the U.S. senate had any evidence of bribes or blackmail hence why Trump was acquitted from those slanderous accusations. 3:33 The "whistle blower" lied about the contents on the Trumps call with the Ukrainian president, not only that but the whistle blower was also dangerously close to espionage while in the process of gaining said information. This wouldn’t be new since we know there have been cases of GOVERMENT OFFICALS spying on trumps campaign before, which you touch upon later. So yes the “whistle blower” deserves to be punished for this. There was no evidence of Trump having actually committed any of the crimes he was accused of like bribery or blackmail and thus he was acquitted as our legal system demands. 4:39 The F.B.I. director should have been fired because he colluded with the previously Obama administration to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. Compare that to Trump who we now know never colluded with Russia just as he claimed from the start. There was no evidence that the trump foundation solicit illegal hacking for their personal gain or a political rival’s downfall. Not only that but he has also put into action several orders in regards to Russia’s involvement in international affairs in relation to other countries militaries. 6:35 Trump himself said that his bank account in china is old and had been shut down before he even became president in the most recent debate. Again not to mention Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden actually has recently been proven to have taken money from Russian officials for as of yet undisclosed reasons. 6:55 Trump had every right to disperse those protestors, there are limits to how people can protest and, blocking access to or from a government building is one of those limits. They shouldn’t have been protesting there in the first place. 7:02 On a whim?! People were being killed and buildings were being burned down and he calls that on a whim?! There were full blown riots happening in those cities, and so the Mayors of those cities’ asked the president for aid in quelling the civil anarchy. The National Guard was sent in to regain control and order in the city as any president is well within their rights to do. How can you be so disingenuous as to say that it was on a whim? 8:06 What trump says in a private conversation 15 ago with his friends in a situation where he doesn’t know that he is being recorded is far from an admission of sexual assault. You don’t know if it was actually true or just simple posturing between male friends in a private setting. Sure it’s a raunchy thing to say; you can even call him an asshole for saying it. But that is not an admission of sexual assault.
    4
  708. 4
  709. 4
  710. 4
  711. 4
  712.  @roscojenkins7451  Billionaires literally could not exist without society allowing them to exist by giving them money in exchange for what ever product they are selling. If someone is willing to buy something worth 10$ for 200$ thats on them not the bilionare. Apperntly they see that the value of said item is worth 200$ instead of just what ever the base material cost of the item is. Nothing has inherent value, the only value something has is the subjective value people decided to give it. No one is forcing people to pay what ever amount for an item, its THEIR money and they are CHOOSING to give said money over to someone and help make them a billionare. No one is being screwed over. The workers only get payed for building the chair, thats it, they dont own the chair, the person who paid for the materials owns the chair. The OWNER was the one who invested their own capital into what ever it is they are making, the workers didnt invest any capital of their own. Workers get paid regardless of of the chair sells or not. Without the person who hirers the workers they wouldn't be doing anything and its much eaiser to get more workers than it is to get people to buy the chair. Just because someone builds something doesn't now give them owner ship of that thing. That would be like if you paid to have a house built and you bought all the materials and land and property rights, Just becuase someone else assembled the house THEY now own it? Why? Theyve already been paid for their part in helping create the house. The workers agree to a set price to merely put together materials that are already owned by someone else. They are getting paid for assembly, not getting paid for the item, BY CHOICE might I reiterate, they don't own the item. If they wanted to get paid more they can invest their own capital into buying the chairs.
    4
  713. 4
  714. 4
  715. 4
  716. 4
  717. 4
  718. 4
  719. 4
  720. 4
  721. 4
  722. 4
  723. 4
  724. 4
  725. 4
  726. 4
  727. 4
  728. 4
  729. 4
  730. 4
  731. 4
  732. 4
  733. 4
  734. 4
  735. 4
  736. 4
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851. 3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. 3
  857. 3
  858. 3
  859. 3
  860. 3
  861. 3
  862. 3
  863. 3
  864. 3
  865. 3
  866. 3
  867. 3
  868. 3
  869.  @Lewtable  You hire them for TRAINING and cheaper labor. Not because you need the job done that badly. Thus why you pay them less than normal. Wages HAVE ALWAYS been based on qualifications.... Why wouldnt they be? If you aren't qualified for a job then you likly arent gonna have the job in the first place led alone get paid the same as someone who IS qualified for that job. Getting hired doesnt mean you actually meet the qualifications for the job. You could just be all that's left to fill a position. If pay was strictly based on hours people would be getting paid for doing absolutely the most minute amount of work without actually providing anything its a horrible idea and even still it does happen. If you time isn't worth as much as someone elses then yes your get paid less, that's how supply and demand works. You are suppose to get paid less for having less experience for a job since that means you are more than likely less qualified for that job than someone else. Just because you have the same job as someone else doesn't mean your doing it as well as they are. All of the world exist in a hierarchy, its the natural state of humans to be in hierarchy's. Hierarchy's are nessecarey. If there is an employee whos skills are so poor that there's a notable difference between him and his peers then yes that does mean that said employees should be paid less if not fired. You cant just "pay people more" money doesn't just appear out of nowhere. Not even THE REST OF SOCEITY treats teens as equals, it treats them as children. SO why should jobs treat them as equals when they aren't? No ones forcing them to work, THEY are the ones seeking employment. Its not the jobs lining up to hiring teens with no experience for the same price as someone who actually knows how to do the job.
    3
  870. 3
  871. 3
  872. 3
  873. 3
  874. 3
  875. 3
  876. 3
  877. 3
  878. 3
  879. 3
  880. 3
  881. 3
  882. 3
  883.  @robinofmoxley  What the current system does to try and prevent poverty has proven to be disasterous . Social programs hurt the impoverished ALOT more than they help because they incentivizes people to become dependent on the government instead of trying to increase their standing in society, ensuring they stay in poverty. What happens when there is no minimum wage is people flourish as they have more access to jobs. The whole idea of a minimum wage in America originated from racist sentiment about how black people were taking jobs from white people. At that time blacks had a higher employment rate than whites and were doing well because of it. But then to combat this the minimum wage was implemented which drove black people out of jobs since why would store owners employ a black person when the could just employ a white person for the same price. Compare that to now with a MUCH larger part of the black community being impoverished AND ALSO dependent on social programs. So if anything it's been proven that having no minimum wage works far better than trying to implement social programs into a capitalist country. A business is suppose to have more power than a single worker as it employs more than a single worker. And obviously if a business is paying to low no one will accept the job so that will just naturally force them to raise their wages, basic supply and demand. This will also help increase industry in the US as more businesses are able to be created. So again no, forcing business to have a bare minimum wage has done nothing but hurt the impoverished in the US since it only forces employers to lay more people off since they no longer can pay their current employees. Not just pay people more and give away free money. Businesses aren't made of money.
    3
  884. 3
  885. 3
  886. 3
  887. 3
  888. 3
  889. 3
  890. 3
  891. 3
  892. 3
  893. 3
  894. 3
  895. 3
  896. 3
  897. 3
  898. 3
  899. 3
  900. 3
  901. 3
  902. 3
  903. 3
  904. 3
  905. 3
  906. 3
  907. 3
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 3
  912. 3
  913. 3
  914. 3
  915. 3
  916. 3
  917. 3
  918. 3
  919. 3
  920. 3
  921. 3
  922. 3
  923. 3
  924. 3
  925. 3
  926. 3
  927. 3
  928. 3
  929. 3
  930. 3
  931. 3
  932. 3
  933. 3
  934. 3
  935. 3
  936. 3
  937. 3
  938. 3
  939. 3
  940. 3
  941. 3
  942. 3
  943. 3
  944. 3
  945. 3
  946. 3
  947. 3
  948. 3
  949. 3
  950. 3
  951. 3
  952. 3
  953. 3
  954. 3
  955. 3
  956. 3
  957. 3
  958. 3
  959. 3
  960. 3
  961. 3
  962. 3
  963. 3
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 3
  987. 3
  988. 3
  989. 3
  990. 3
  991. 3
  992. 3
  993. 3
  994. 3
  995. 3
  996. 3
  997.  @Tespri  "there is no requirement that businesses with fewer than 50 employees offer coverage to their workers. Many do anyway, but nearly half of all businesses with 3 to 49 workers do not offer health benefits" You acknowledging that there are exceptions disproves your original statement. You seem to be having a very hard to understanding the definitions of the words you us. Emergency: a serious, UNEXPECTED, and often dangerous situation requiring immediate action. Things like cancer in insulin deficiency's aren't unexpected and dont require immediate action and thus are regarded as medical emergencies. Once again you acknowledging that the government doesn't always pay out disproves your original statement, your are contradicting your self constantly, I am quite sure you dont actually know what you are talking about in this context now. You aren't making any arguments, you are just stating blatantly false information such as "the government always paying out medical expenses" or "Its not natural for countries to take on debt" or "Hospitals always treat people no matter what" ect ect. You are constantly lying and contradicting yourself, all ive done is debunk your statements. We aren't talking about hyperinflation, we are talking about debt in general, stop trying to pivot away from the main point. Literally every country has some debt, and almost none of them are undergoing hyper inflation. Once again, your statements are proven wrong. You said you used google to disprove my statement of every country having debt, so go ahead, give me an example of a country with no debt. The burden of proof is actually on you to state a country that doesn't have any debt at all. Once again you pivot away from the point of people taking out loans they cant handle. A banks reasoning for giving out the loan is irrelevant, this is yet another example of you ignoring reality and only seeing things as you want them to be instead of how they are. The FACT is that people ARE being given loans that they will never be able to pay back. If you try to ignore that then YOU ARE BEING DISHONEST. Stop trying to pivot away from the main point. Like seriously think about the logic of what your saying. If banks would never grant loans to people who couldnt pay them back, then how do people EVER get trapped under debt they will never be able to pay for? If the bank never grants loans to those who cant pay them then obviously that must mean that no one has any debt they cant payback right? Except YOU KNOW thats false because there are THOUSANDS of people who are under a debt that they will never be able to pay back. So again your just blatantly lying again. Seriously starting to question if you aren't just a bot that is regurgitating talking points. And if you are a real person thank god people like you arent listened to when it comes to making decisions on how to manage a countries economy.
    3
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015. 3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026. 3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034. 3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 3
  1041. 3
  1042. 2:20 It is very disingenuous to call a non-disclosure agreement…hush money. Non-disclosure agreements are not illegal or else literally thousands businesses in the United States would be dissolved by now. 2:30 Do you have any evidence that Micheal Cohen did all of those things under the command of the president? And specifically in regards to contributing to a presidential campaign as it is not illegal to make campaign contributions unless you are from another country. Let alone establishing intent to sabotage a rival’s campaign is very shaky. Especially considering that third parties have reportedly spied on trumps campaign. Where is the rule of law in those cases? 3:06 Trump didn't try to use that money to bribe anyone, that money was already going to Ukraine and trump simply talked to the Ukrainian president in a request to investigate reports of corruption which is not illegal. If you actually cared about or rule of law you would endorse trump trying to investigate claims of corruption. Especially since we now know that Joe Biden's son Hunter has been actually PROVEN to have taken money from certain Russian officials. Joe Biden also had influence in the Ukrainian government as he handled relations with Ukraine during Obamas presidency, under which time Hunter Biden was receive a large amount of funding for working as a board director for a Ukrainian-owned private energy company despite him not having required qualifications for said position. So it seems as if said investigations were well warranted. Very convenient for you to bring this topic of corruption up now even after we know for a fact know that Hunter Biden is involved with some corruption involving the Russian government. There were no threats of withholding funding. Even if it Trump definitively stated that he was going to of withhold funds from the Ukrainian government in exchange for aid in an investigation involving corruption with the previous administration doing so is completely within the president of the United States power if he believes it to be necessary to get rid of corruption. That is common practice in international politics; Countries can withhold funds from others for political gain. This includes such things as trade tariffs, taxing certain goods, and yes withholding funding. It was not a bribe, it was not black mail, there was and still is no evidence of such things and again even if there were any declarations of financial withholdings those claims wouldn't even fit the definition of a bribe in this context. Not even the U.S. senate had any evidence of bribes or blackmail hence why Trump was acquitted from those slanderous accusations. 3:33 The "whistle blower" lied about the contents on the Trumps call with the Ukrainian president, not only that but the whistle blower was also dangerously close to espionage while in the process of gaining said information. This wouldn’t be new since we know there have been cases of GOVERMENT OFFICALS spying on trumps campaign before, which you touch upon later. So yes the “whistle blower” deserves to be punished for this. There was no evidence of Trump having actually committed any of the crimes he was accused of like bribery or blackmail and thus he was acquitted as our legal system demands. You are the one who strangely who wants to twist what our legal system represents to fit your own agenda. It’s innocent until proven guilty for a reason. If you actually respected our rule of law you surly wouldn’t deny this fact. 4:39 The F.B.I. director should have been fired because he colluded with the previously Obama administration to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. Compare that to Trump who we now know never colluded with Russia just as he claimed from the start. You have no evidence that the trump foundation solicit illegal hacking for their personal gain or a political rival’s downfall. Not only that but he has also put into action several orders in regards to Russia’s involvement in international affairs in relation to other countries militaries. 6:35 Trump himself said that his bank account in china is old and had been shut down before he even became president in the most recent debate. Again not to mention Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden actually has recently been proven to have taken money from Russian officials for as of yet undisclosed reasons. 6:55 Trump had every right to disperse those protestors, there are limits to how people can protest and, blocking access to or from a government building is one of those limits. They shouldn’t have been protesting there in the first place. 7:02 On a whim?! People were being killed and buildings were being burned down and you call that on a whim?! There were full blown riots happening in those cities, and so the Mayors of those cities’ asked the president for aid in quelling the civil anarchy. The National Guard was sent in to regain control and order in the city as any president is well within their rights to do. How can you be so disingenuous as to say that it was on a whim? At one point I may have actually respected you despite knowing that you were in opposition to me politically but seeing as how you are capable of throwing away any morality in an attempt to deceive people for your own political gain has made me lose all respect for you. 8:06 What trump says in a private conversation 15 ago with his friends in a situation where he doesn’t know that he is being recorded is far from an admission of sexual assault. You don’t know if it was actually true or just simple posturing between male friends in a private setting. Sure it’s a raunchy thing to say; you can even call him an asshole for saying it. But that is not an admission of sexual assault. You know as well as I do a statement under conditions like those would NEVER hold up in court. I do believe in our rule of law, you however only seem to believe in it when it benefits you, and when you are proven wrong you immediately jump to something being illegitimate. I didn’t know your political bias was so extreme that you would stoop to something as low as this.
    3
  1043. 3
  1044. 3
  1045. 3
  1046. 3
  1047. 3
  1048. 3
  1049. 3
  1050. 3
  1051. 3
  1052. 3
  1053. 3
  1054. 3
  1055. 3
  1056. 3
  1057. 3
  1058. 3
  1059. 3
  1060. 3
  1061.  @ivarbrouwer197  Health care isn't a right, its privledge, a right is something that cant be taken away from you when you are in a vacuum. But if anything trump has given people more options when it comes to choosing what kind of health care they thing is right for them. Instead of Obama care which forced people into certain brackets. Roe V Wade should be over turned because there is no objective reason to end a childs life, there isn't even a hard biological evidence suggested by democrats for where the life of the child starts. it's all just feelings so it's IMMORAL as you say to kill it when we don't even know. Taking kids away from their "parents" at the border is an Obama era policy... Trump wasn't the one who implemented it. Not that I even particularly disagree with Obama in this case since if someone is neglectful enough to bring their children with them to commit such a dangerous crime as breaking into another country illegally they, aren't responsible enough to have said child. 2000 people die each year trying to get into the united states illegally, among other crimes that happen to them? And these parents are dragging their children into this. Not to mention the people bringing these children aren't even the children's parents sometimes. You obviously don't know what asylum means or what qualifies someone to be able to seek it. Asylum doesn't mean that just because their county isn't as well off as the U.S. that they are now eligible for asylum. Asylum only applies to people that are actually being persecuted specifically BY their government or are in a war torn state which a VAST majority of the time they aren't. Trump so far hasn't even started any wars compared to most other presidents in history unlike Obama.
    3
  1062. 3
  1063. 3
  1064. 3
  1065. 3
  1066. 3
  1067. 3
  1068. 3
  1069. 3
  1070. 3
  1071.  @rendomstranger8698  Apparently you haven't looked into billionaires much at all considering you don't know the common fact that only 21% of them inherited ANY of their wealth. These millionaires and billionaires you seem to hate so much are the ones actually pushing society forward. Without them we would stagnate because they are the main ones driving innovation and revolutionizing the world. Bezos forever changed the logistics of the U.S. Elon forever change the payment methods of the world and is continuing to develope revolutionary technology's such as electric cars and ai. Bill gates has donated millions to deliver vaccines to already impoverished nations and developed world changing technology's for computers. It's people like you that feel nothing but envy of their wealth and influence that are holding the rest of humanity back, with the thought process of "if i cant succeed no one should be able to". If YOU don't have what they have then they shouldn't either. Nothing but short sided fools. All the while willfully ignoring the fact of how hard they worked to get to where they are. They have already worked harder and done more for the world than jealous people like you will do in your entire lives. They deserve to be where they are. They have improved the quality of life for the entire world. Even now people like you still use the fruits of these billionaires labor. They don't owe anyone anything, they have already contributed enough to society. People should get their own life in order first before they start worrying about others and trying to shift blame.
    3
  1072. 3
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359.  @kenny6920  There is actually very little to suggest harsher gun laws reduce gun crime. Its not even correlated since again, the US doesn't have the highest gun crime despite having the most guns. Just look at Australia, their crime rate actually went up after they confiscated guns. I want people to be able to protect themselves in what ever way they see fit. The state is not what gives people that right. Nor should it ever be. You are the one that believes the opposite. It is only people like you who are under the impression of might makes right and to always obey someone just because they have authority. More lives are saved with guns in the US than taken. If you are completely incapable of surviving on your own that's fine but that doesn't mean everyone elsea is. And it doesn't mean the state can just subjugate the entire country just by shutting off some utilities if that's what you are suggesting, if anything that would make it worse for the state. People need very little to actually survive, most of what we have currently are just luxeries. An individual doesn't need to provide for everyone, just themselves. The united states isn't a collective and was never intended to be, it was seperated into 50 states for a reason. There are more ways to get necessities than just from the state. All you are saying is that you'd rather live in an authoritarian state that takes peoples freedoms and rights just so YOU can have your own sense of safety and security under the guise of being compasionate. Your own comfort over others freedom. Truly exemplifying your sentiment of being unconfident in providing for yourself. To be fair your logic is at least sound if not selfish and evil. But "those willing to sacrifice essential Liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither and will lose both." You might recognize that as being the words of one of our countries founders.
    2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. Freedom and democracy aren't the same thing. The united states prides itself as being the most free country in the world but not the most democratic. It was never meant to be completely democratic, we lean more towards being a republic than a democracy. When it comes to freedom indexes they are not accurate when it comes to representing how much "freedom" a country allows its citizens, considering they have a myriad of different standard for freedom. The freedom index measure things like free college and free health care as "freedoms" when those are not what freedoms are, those are privileges'. Where as it still gives high marks to countrys that severely curtail peoples right to free speech. Freedoms is the ability for an individual in a country to do what they want without the government bearing down on them and in America as a country leads the world in that. In regards to money in politics can you really blame people for that? It use to be that trying to buy and bribe politicians in power with money was basically worthless as they didnt have the power to actually do anything that could influence things on that kind of level but ever since we have given the government more power and control over peoples lives. Of course things like lobbying are going to become more prevalent, as they should since people dont WANT government interfering in their lives and will do what they can to make sure they can keep their freedom. When it comes to different voting systems I feel like the more complicated you make voting the less voter turn out you get but thats just an assumption. Also lets not forget, a vast majority of the countries that have high voter turnouts and high "democracy" rates have MUCH smaller population sizes than in the united states so obviously people there are going to feel like their votes matter more because their votes ACTUALLY DO matter more, up to 60 TIMES more infact. Try to imagine how much people would feel like their votes mattered in those countries if literally ALL of the nations in the European union were 1 country and had to vote for things that effect each other, do you still think their democracy scores would be as high even by their own standards? That they would keep their high voter turn out rate? Because I seriously doubt they would, and thats what its like in the US. The electoral college as a pivotal part of the US voting system and voting would become much worse as it descend into basically mob rule and civil war. Jerry mandering is pretty awful though.
    2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844.  @Hifuutorian  2:20 It is very disingenuous to call a non-disclosure agreement…hush money. Non-disclosure agreements are not illegal or else literally thousands businesses in the United States would be dissolved by now. 2:30 Do you have any evidence that Micheal Cohen did all of those things under the command of the president? And specifically in regards to contributing to a presidential campaign as it is not illegal to make campaign contributions unless you are from another country. Let alone establishing intent to sabotage a rival’s campaign is very shaky. Especially considering that third parties have reportedly spied on trumps campaign. Where is the rule of law in those cases? 3:06 Trump didn't try to use that money to bribe anyone, that money was already going to Ukraine and trump simply talked to the Ukrainian president in a request to investigate reports of corruption which is not illegal. If you actually cared about or rule of law you would endorse trump trying to investigate claims of corruption. Especially since we now know that Joe Biden's son Hunter has been actually PROVEN to have taken money from certain Russian officials. Joe Biden also had influence in the Ukrainian government as he handled relations with Ukraine during Obamas presidency, under which time Hunter Biden was receive a large amount of funding for working as a board director for a Ukrainian-owned private energy company despite him not having required qualifications for said position. So it seems as if said investigations were well warranted. Very convenient to bring this topic of corruption up now even after we know for a fact know that Hunter Biden is involved with some corruption involving the Russian government. There were no threats of withholding funding. Even if it Trump definitively stated that he was going to of withhold funds from the Ukrainian government in exchange for aid in an investigation involving corruption with the previous administration doing so is completely within the president of the United States power if he believes it to be necessary to get rid of corruption. That is common practice in international politics; Countries can withhold funds from others for political gain. This includes such things as trade tariffs, taxing certain goods, and yes withholding funding. It was not a bribe, it was not black mail, there was and still is no evidence of such things and again even if there were any declarations of financial withholdings those claims wouldn't even fit the definition of a bribe in this context. Not even the U.S. senate had any evidence of bribes or blackmail hence why Trump was acquitted from those slanderous accusations. 3:33 The "whistle blower" lied about the contents on the Trumps call with the Ukrainian president, not only that but the whistle blower was also dangerously close to espionage while in the process of gaining said information. This wouldn’t be new since we know there have been cases of GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS spying on trumps campaign before, which you touch upon later. So yes the “whistle blower” deserves to be punished for this. There was no evidence of Trump having actually committed any of the crimes he was accused of like bribery or blackmail and thus he was acquitted as our legal system demands. You are the one who strangely who wants to twist what our legal system represents to fit your own agenda. It’s innocent until proven guilty for a reason. If you actually respected our rule of law you surly wouldn’t deny this fact. 4:39 The F.B.I. director should have been fired because he colluded with the previously Obama administration to spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. Compare that to Trump who we now know never colluded with Russia just as he claimed from the start. You have no evidence that the trump foundation solicit illegal hacking for their personal gain or a political rival’s downfall. Not only that but he has also put into action several orders in regards to Russia’s involvement in international affairs in relation to other countries militaries. 6:35 Trump himself said that his bank account in china is old and had been shut down before he even became president in the most recent debate. Again not to mention Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden actually has recently been proven to have taken money from Russian officials for as of yet undisclosed reasons. 6:55 Trump had every right to disperse those protestors, there are limits to how people can protest and, blocking access to or from a government building is one of those limits. They shouldn’t have been protesting there in the first place. 7:02 On a whim?! People were being killed and buildings were being burned down and you call that on a whim?! There were full blown riots happening in those cities, and so the Mayors of those cities’ asked the president for aid in quelling the civil anarchy. The National Guard was sent in to regain control and order in the city as any president is well within their rights to do. How can you be so disingenuous as to say that it was on a whim? 8:06 What trump says in a private conversation 15 ago with his friends in a situation where he doesn’t know that he is being recorded is far from an admission of sexual assault. You don’t know if it was actually true or just simple posturing between male friends in a private setting. Sure it’s a raunchy thing to say; you can even call him an asshole for saying it. But that is not an admission of sexual assault. You know as well as I do a statement under conditions like those would NEVER hold up in court.
    2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848.  @Tespri  "While those that don't provide it most LIKLY already pay more than enough" You disprove your very point here by recognizing that not all jobs grant health insurance. Just because you can die to something doesn't make it a medical emergency. Again you are completely over looking things like insulin as well as cancer. The government doesn't always pay out medical cost either that is completely false. So again I ask are you being intentionally dishonest or are you just arguing on a topic your ignorant about. Countries having debt doesn't kill people. As I keep saying literally EVERY country has some level of debt, and no one has died from said debt. You don't even have proof that a country having debt causes societal collapse. Every country has debt and is doing fine with it. So your statements are OBJECTIVLY false. Whether they have broken a debt ceiling is irrelevant as thats not what we are talking about. So again you are just making blatantly false statements in a dishonest or ignorant attempt to prove a point. You must not know what he word "normal/ natural mean' because if something is "common practice" that makes it THE NORM aka NORMAL. And yes very many people do choose to live outside their capabilities by taking loans. This doesnt disprove anything ive said, Its exactly what I said in fact, "people taking out loans for temporary monetary benefit knowing they wont be able to pay them back". What the banks think is irrelevant, we arent talking about the ones giving out the loans, we are talking about the people who take out loans. The government backing the loans doesn't erase the fact that the loans are being givin out. Again your own statements disprove your lies. You are acknowledging here that people ARE TAKING OUT LOANS that they cant and will never be able to pay back, especially given how interest rates work. You are conflating how you want things to work with how they actually work. How you WANT things to work is irrelevant. I seriously cant tell if you are ignorant or dishonest. Perhaps its both.
    2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. 2
  1873. 2
  1874. 2
  1875. 2
  1876. 2
  1877. 2
  1878. 2
  1879. 2
  1880. 2
  1881. 2
  1882. 2
  1883. 2
  1884. 2
  1885. 2
  1886. 2
  1887. 2
  1888. 2
  1889. 2
  1890. 2
  1891. 2
  1892. 2
  1893. 2
  1894. 2
  1895. 2
  1896. 2
  1897. 2
  1898. 2
  1899. 2
  1900. 2
  1901. 2
  1902. 2
  1903. 2
  1904. 2
  1905. 2
  1906. 2
  1907. 2
  1908. 2
  1909. 2
  1910. 2
  1911.  @tylerlaroche2509  Well of course no one thing is gonna be able to lift an entire nation out of poverty, but people moving to less expensive areas sure would help ALOT was more so my point. When it comes to peoples individual responsibilities, things that cause people to become impoverished can very well be beyond their control, however ESCAPING said poverty is always possible for an individual, thus when it comes to STAYING in poverty yes I think at a certain point a person has no one to blame but themselves. And yes I agree just because its possible for people to escape poverty doesn't mean everyone in the whole nation will escape poverty. However if we are talking about ideals, if we truly did somehow have the "smartest most ambitious populace in the world where every single person does everything in their power to succeed" I think at that point we would not have any poverty. There would more than likely still be economic classes but poverty in such a hypothetical I think wouldn't exist. The system isnt a zero sum game, just because someone succeeds doesn't mean someone else has to fail. Also maybe lazy isnt quite accurate, more like not as motivated as they could be, or complacent in how things are. Not everyone starts off at the same level socially so yes some are going to have a harder time escaping poverty but it is very much still possible and within their control. If it were a goal of the country to "help our fellow citizens achieve" it may be virtuous but I think would end up bringing down the people who were already achieving on their own. I think it best to let everyone progress on their own and at their own pace and aid them when we can instead of it being a societal compulsion, people should be responsible for themselves first and foremost. Even someone in 100,000 in debt can lift them selves out of poverty, it would be very difficult but far from impossible. The system itself isn't suppressing anyone, some people just are going to have a naturally tougher time simply due to the circumstances of their birth. But thats not really the systems fault, its not as if it was intentionally designed to suppress those people i dont believe, it just favors certain things.
    2
  1912. 2
  1913. ​ @tylerlaroche2509  And those countries have like 1/10th the population size of America making them much less complex socially not to mention how much the US spends on its military can sometimes be ever more than those entire countries GDP and the only reason those countries are safe at all is because of americas military which is basically used as a world police which is wrong imo. Redlining is no longer a thing in modern times, and whether it was ever a thing or not there would still be massive disparities between people. "generational wealth" is irrelevant in this context since most people in the country dont have the kind of "generational wealth" you are referring to. The system very much does afford everyone OPPURTUNITY. But opportunity does not mean you get guarantees, its simply a chance. And saying something is a social construct when we live in a society doesn't mean anything, society is a social construct as is everything thats apart of it, it shouldnt matter if its a social construct or not as its effects are very much real. It could be easier for people better their circumstances but if thats what you want then you would want the government stepping OUT of peoples way as much as possible since its exclusively the government that has the power to make it intentionally harder for people to better their circumstances. A society being more or less just doesn't give it more or less control over reality. In reality bad things are gonna happen to people that are beyond their control forever and always. Its just an unfortunate fact of life, but just because bad things happen to some people doesn't mean that everyone should be forced to share in their suffering when they had nothing to do with it. That's not just, its quite the opposite I find actually, its evil. The "system" isn't just or unjust it just is, any kind of moral judgements that can be made are up to actual people, not the system, you cant use "the system" as an excuse for peoples bad behaviors, humans aren't mindless drones enslaved to some system they are individuals. My point about people moving to less expensive areas is that since those areas are less expensive there would be less poverty.
    2
  1914. 2
  1915. 2
  1916. ​ @alexxx4434  As I said fairness isn't the most important value, there are other values to consider, and capitalism in particular prioritizes freedom over fairness. But even by historical standards the current system is EXTREMELY fair compared to its contemporary's and every other system that came before it before it at least in the US. Capitalism gives a chance, a chance is not a guarantee. A chance on its own doesn't and shouldn't give people anything, its something people take advantage of to do things for THEMSELVES and is the best that can be hoped for in regards to seeking "fairness". Not everyone will be able to take advantage of the opportunities they were given but that doesn't mean they didn't have said opportunities. Discrimination is irrelevant in such a case because discrimination isn't part of capitalism, discrimination is its own thing that can exist in literally any economic system. Trying to make the system arbitrarily "more fair" would result in the opposite happening as we have already seen. And no, the poor aren't getting poorer under capitalism, quite the opposite in fact. Under capitalism not only are rich are getting richer but the poor are ALSO getting richer. Not at the exact same rate as each other since as I said life's not fair, but every one is still getting richer through capitalism, simply look back to how bad things were in the past before capitalism. You'd rather everyone be equally poor instead of everyone becoming more wealthy just because some get more wealth than others? That doesn't sound like a concern for fairness, it sounds like envy. Capitalism hasn't "run its course" not even close, as I said until humans as a species change capitalism is the best system for our civilizations currently. As you hinted at, capitalism more than any other economic system takes human nature into account THE MOST, hence why it has been the most successful economic system. "hinders humanity to grow beyond basic needs" in literally what way? Under capitalism basic human needs have not only been met but have been FAR FAR SURPASSED. To the point were such over abundance of has become a hindrance, and not to mention all the auxiliary things that have come about due to said system such as vastly improved technology. Not to mention its a luxury that people can have their food made for them when in the past literally everyone had to be farmers just to survive. SO seriously in literally WHAT WAY does capitalism hinder humanities growth? Because to me it seems like it has done EXACTLY the opposite. If you want an example of an economic system "hindering humanities to growth beyond basic needs" I point you to communism and the mass famines it brought about multiple times killing millions of people each time. The previous economic systems that you are referencing like feudalism don't even proportionally compare to capitalism NOR does its contemporaries such as communism or socialisms, both of which have done MUCH more harm despite coming AFTER capitalism, so the idea of newer systems always being better isn't true either. We aren't seeing capitalism in crysis, that's an over exaggerated. Capitalism as a a system may be undergoing struggles, but not due to any fault of its own. The current problems capitalism is having are the result of other foreign and corrosive economic systems such as socialism interfering with capitalisms normal operations. It's not capitalism or any other economic system that is driving conflict, the blame for that falls squarely on people. Workers have ALWYAS been protesting about working conditions all over the globe and that is never going to change. Its nothing new to current times.
    2
  1917.  @alexxx4434  Capital owners? That category encompasses like 99% of people under capitalism. Nearly everyone under capitalism has SOME form of capital under their ownership. So why would capitalism prioritize their freedom? Capitalism offered them the chance to eat responsibly and not get diabetes in the first place, no one force them to get diabetes. Getting treatment for an illness isn't a right, a right is something a person has in a vacuum, without other people to make insulin a person with diabetes would literally just die. Money is power in every economic system as money as a concept PREDATES economic systems, the idea of trading a representative currency in exchange for other items. Money is just the physical representation of human work energy, of course its power, why wouldn't it be? Why shouldn't it be? You think someone who does no work should have as much power as someone who does a lot of work? That doesn't sound fair to me. And yes said money is not distributed evenly since the work people do is not distributed evenly, not to mention how much someone's work is valued is subjective, not something that has a set value. making the system "more fair" just leads to taking things away from those who have actually earned what they have and giving it to people who haven't earned those things but are in worse positions, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" AKA communism. My beliefs are irrelevant to this and so are yours since statics DO NOT display that the poor are getting poorer. Quality of life has been rising ALL OVER THE WORLD for like 200 years because of capitalism. Just because not EVERYONE in the US has the basic needs met doesn't mean those needs are incapable of being met, it means the person whos needs aren't being met is at fault for not doing what that are suppose to do. Basic needs are not rights, rights are things you have in a vacuum, things that cannot be given or taken away. Without other people to grow the food, build the shelter and provide the safety people would have to obtain those things themselves, thus they are not rights. And trying to instill these things as rights would do nothing for humanities progress. ACTUAL progress requires effort and struggle, not by having what ever you want whenever you want it. And you are massively misinterpreting the intent of food producers during the great depression. In the first place your assertion that they would destroy resources just so that they could maintain prices makes zero logical or historical sense. Why would they intentionally keep prices high when no one could buy what they were selling anyway, the answer is they couldn't and didn't since the stores that were selling produce ALSO went out of business since no one could buy anything at the time. Secondly, yes, producers have to destroy their crops as if they don't then they wont be able to regrow for the next season and would lose their lively hoods and business and thus they wouldn't be able to grow ANY food for ANYONE. I don't know if you know this but food doesn't just stay there forever, it rots, and when it rots people aren't going to buy it , and since no one had the funds to buy said produce they WERE going to rot. Food doesn't come from nothing, it takes resources and effort to make the amount of food a nation requires and if said resources are going to go to waste because people cant buy the food then there is no point in using said resources. Like seriously your entire argument about capitalism resulting in food destruction because of the great depression gets completely debunked by simply knowing how supply chains work. Or even recognizing the fact that food doesn't stay perpetually fresh ESPECTUALLY during the time of the great depression. Its total historical revisionism. If you want the problems plaguing the current capitalistic systems to be :fixed" then acknowledge what is ACTUALLY causing the probelms instead of blaming the wrong thing.
    2
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. 2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. 2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945. 2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948.  @jacobgogue  Automation will still mostly make work easier. A minority of the jobs effected by automation get fully replaced. Making theirs easier rather than flat out replacing entire industry's is well... easier. And the owners of said machines have a right to do what they want with their own property, the government shouldn't have a say in what a person does with their own property as long as it is not DIRECTLY hurting someone else. People should logically be the lords of their own land and what ever resources they can obtain through said land its rightfully theirs. I know what you were referencing when you mentioned worker owner ship but realistically worker coops are just an inferior way to run a business in the US do to how many problems it has. And its not even like worker coops are illegal in the US, people can create a worker coop businesses if they want but they choose not to because as I said its an interior way to run a business. And you wouldnt even need unions for automation considering machines aren't alive and dont have rights. Not to mention unions currently already have too much power. It is entirely reasonable for the only voice for people to have to be through their capital considering our entire economics system runs on it making it probably the MOST important part of the economy. It is the people who hold the power on what to spend their money on. If cooperation's dont have access to peoples money they fail, unless propped up by government subsidizes which is yet another problem of the government. Vegans are a small minority, it wouldnt make sense for them to dictate and entire industry while most people eat meat. And there are tons of vegan options in places like restaurants and stores already so they demonstrably have had an effect.
    2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982. 2
  1983. 2
  1984. 2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019. 2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042.  @ivarbrouwer197  Literally 99% of abortion cases are not because of rape or incest, why are you trying to make it out that that is even a large percentage ? The child is not the woman's body, it took 2 people to create it, it didn't just appear out of no where, it is its own life, it would become its own life without any intervention from the woman. She was the one who made the choice to partake in an activity that had a risk of her becoming pregnant and the child is not responsible for that, she is and also the male but no one cares what males think when it comes to abortions for some reason even though they are half the reason the child is there in the first place. I know trump didn't stop it nor did he have to. It's kind of irresponsible to detain minors in the same place you detain adults in the first place. immigrants Those country's are not the united states, they. Just because they also have a healthcare system doesn't mean we share the same values. Just because their health care is free doesn't make it all around better, the waiting times, the GOVERNMENT deciding what kinds of people are worthy of what kind of treatment, the actual quality of care, all things the united states healthcare system is better at. Hell when people actually have a life threatening condition that can be fixed with things like surgery they actually come to the US to have it done rather than having it done in states that have a free healthcare system. No health care system will ever be perfect but I prefer the one we already have compared to theirs.
    2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268.  @stephenspackman5573  Yes humans are property, whether you think they should be or not. Its been that way since all of human history. People taking claim over each other. MY wife, My family, MY kid, ect ect. This is how relationships work. Not to mention the cases were people were ACTUALLY owning each other via slavery. Which still happens in modern day in first world countries, its called prison. Thus since a child is the parents property, they are held responsible for that property. Otherwise parents wouldn't be held responsible for what their kids do at all. Its like a dog, if your dog bites some one you get fined or even jailed. Since you are the dogs owner. There wasn't a precedent for federally funded public schools before the industrial revolution. It was left up to the parents to teach their kids the vast majority of the time. "there was far more emphasis... on vocation" You aren't even disagreeing, you recognized that the point of school was to prepare people for vocation. The basics they would need to operate in those conditions. Basic read writing and math. Stand in a line, do your assignment, stay quite, orderly rows, ect ect. It was for organization sake. Not to raise them as if the teachers were their parents trying to instill moral values. The wealth I have isnt because of taxes. I still had to pay for everything I have with MY OWN money just like everyone else does ONTOP OF the government stealing my money. Taxes are in no way responsible for that. People have been trading with each other long before taxes were ever a thing. So if my money is going to be FORCEFULLY taken and put somewhere that I have no control over then yes I had better have a say. That's the gist of how the stock market/economy's in general work. You invest in something, thus you have influence over it. You saying that I should be happy that i'm not getting MORE of my money stolen sounds like a weird form of Stockholm's. The benefits you have aren't from government. You dont need experts to teach children. Parents have been doing that just fine for the vast majority of human history. All animals actually. Literally how we all got here. Schools are more so a glorified daycare so the parents can go to work. What you are referring to Is called a republic. In an true democracy individuals DIRECTLY make decisions on how a society operates. So for people like you who constantly harp on about democracy, going against a more true to form democratic system is odd. And whats more to call it abuse. You see people announcing the grievances and exerting the power they have to make changes as abusive? That sounds much more fascistic. Ironic considering that its at the smaller local level where democracy is most effective. Where everyone can organize and communicate easier. Compared to the larger state/federal level which is mostly where you types seem to advocate for "democracy" the most, in the place were its the least effective.
    1
  2269.  @stephenspackman5573  "My: belonging to the speaker" Pretty clearly a "POSSESSIVE adjective". Similar to most other languages too, not differentiating between owning an item or a person. Even ignoring prisons slavery is still practice in the world in various forms. Because in reality, humans are items just like everything else on the planet is. Hell we've gone as far to say you can OWN an idea. Something intangible. So yes we very much do own each other to varying extents even in the modern world. You don’t have to be to sole proprietor of something to have a stake in it. Government funded schools were PORTRAYED as a socialist reaction, but in reality industrialism doesn't run itself. It REQUIRES workers and that is what public schools churned out just as intended. It’s literally what one of the founders of public schools said the goal of it was. Most Americans were rural at the time of the industrial revolution, they didn't know how to operate the type of equipment used for industrialization nor did they need to. But then all of a sudden the government promises to teach every ones kids for free? Thus a resulting boom in workers years later. Like seriously which do you think is more realistic? That a group of the worlds most powerful men just up and decided to build schools for all the countries children just out of the goodness of their hearts with no ulterior motives what so ever? You can’t be that naive. Governments did not make the “vast machinery for society”, individuals did sometimes groups of individuals working together, but not the governments. You are mistakenly conflating society with government. Attributing all power, agency, and advancements to government when in reality, for the vast majority of those processes that led to modern society, government played an EXTREMEMLY small role. In most cases the rest of said society had nothing to do with said developments either. No government has made anything that you own, not a single thing. You’ve fallen for an idealistic world view that sees a government as no different than the people its ruling over. When in reality that’s patently untrue. The very fact that it has power over people to such a degree makes it FUNDAMENTALLY different. Governments are more similar to corporations. Where a corporations nature is to amass currency, a governments nature is to amass control. You cannot think of either corporations or governments as people. Their goals are not aligned with yours or even the people within them. I’d say it’s like being loyal to apple or Microsoft except at least they actually make products, unlike governments. Also, with corporations under capitalism everyone benefits at least somewhat from the economy growing. Government however is a zero sum game, for government to gain control citizens have to lose control. That may be acceptable for people like you, but it’s inherently problematic and tyrannical. It’s that same type of idealistic world view that thinks “if I ruled they world obviously everything would be so much better”.
    1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. ​ @FirstnameLastname-ju7em  No matter what the action is any single person can completely stifling this type of moral system by simply not accepting the cost and none of the other people can do anything about it. There's never a guarantee someone is participating in good faith, more often times actually people only abide by things like laws because they get punished for breaking them. Why would someone who doesn't want the cost and not immoral ? Their morals are not worse or better than the other people participating are they? Since everyone's morals are subjective. Manipulation is the default here. In this moral system if someone dos something "immoral" they can simply say its not immoral and no one else could do anything about it. Trade is what allows for cooperation not morality. Mutual benefit, both parties gaining something independent of morality. Humans didnt develop morality. Secularly speaking the concept of morality isnt a thing in nature. Humans aren't naturally moral, so at minimum morality is a social construct and must be taught. I may not be able to prove religion but you also cant disprove it. Mean while you also cannot prove that your moral system is objective however I CAN prove that its not objective since you have nothing that can make it so. The moral decisions made by people based on their religion is from the religion, not their subjective viewpoint. If all people have a say in the moral system that's by definition subjectivity. What makes it immoral if not all stake holders all receive consideration? Doesnt that sound like circuler logic? Your morality is objective, because it requires consideration of all stake holders, and to not consider all stake holders is immoral, beucase its moral to consider all stake holders, because the morality is objective, because it requires consideration of all stake holders, ect ect.
    1
  2357.  @FirstnameLastname-ju7em  Why should those things be included? Lying, distortion, ect? Why are they bad? Simply because the system wouldn't work with them? Again that's circular logic. Arguments based on axioms or circular logic aren't sound arguments. A sound argument requires evidence and logic. Familial cooperation isnt moral either, even within family structures there is trade as different parts of said family are responsible for different things and they benefit from the effort everyone puts in. Even down to the children. With children the parents are making an investment in taking care of the children when their young so the children take care of them when their old. Infants aren't raised in isolation. From birth they are in constant contact with their parents and this are constantly observing and learning from their parents via things like social cues. They don't need language for that, alot of communication at that age is non verbal. They are raised on their parents morality, look up experiments done when kids are raised in isolation or the Stanford prison experiment. Morality is not inherent to any creature. Humans alone have a concept of morality because of religion. If my religion is real then it is objectively true since it would be the morality of an okni potent creator. You may not have to BELIEVE in my religion, but regardless of if you believe or not if it's true it is objectively moral. You can make no such claim with your moralities foundation since it's entirely based around you. So yes mine would be closer to being objective because it has infinitely more doubt than yours. Any moral system you come up with CAN NEVER be objective while mine can.
    1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624.  Who knows  It's not about how much they value their culture, it's that their culture is just more conducive to succeeding in America. Just because you value your culture a lot doesn't mean you will succeed in America. You can greatly value bad cultural practices and still be unsuccessful. Hence the the line about people needing to evolve with the times. Also it is a statistical fact that black people in particular do not save their money as much as other demographics of people in America for some reason. This can lead to generational levels of low wealth. The people that do tend to save their money more do better over time since they gain more resources to lift up their next generation. It isn't about simply spending with businesses owned by their own people. I'm not talking about how long their money stays in the community, I'm talking about how much money they have over all. They don't make an effort to strictly keep their money within their own race. Sure some may value their culture but that's only partly why they are so relatively successful. The other part is just what exactly their cultures value so heavily such as schooling in particular. You haven't been saying anything about improving black culture. What you've been saying so far "incorrectly I may reiterate" is that the reason other minority ethnicity's in America do so well is because they keep their money within their race. Which is again wrong. The assertion that race loyalty is what makes a people successful is also incorrect. What makes people successful is perusing good practices REGARDLESS of culture or race.
    1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729.  @kenny6920  More so than me having faith in some random "good guy with a gun" I have faith in MYSELF. I have faith that I will always have MY best interest in heart more so than anyone else. I also have faith that any other person would also want to protect their own life instead of it being in the hands of some criminal or government. So with that, I want to be able to protect myself in anyway I see fit. Not just from criminals but from my own government if need be. I don't have to trust everyone with a gun because I know at the very least I trust myself. Not that I believe that the "social structure" always has my best interest at heart ;as it often hasn't for many people according to history; but since you brought it up, why would guns interfere with the social structure more so than anything else? Surly if the social structure was as stable as you seem believe then if anything guns would increase its security as they give people more control over their own lives instead of having it all rest at the head of a single entity that could potentially yield to any number of weaknesses, thus making the entire structure more safe no? This also aids in mitigating the amount of harm that be caused by said entity just incase something did go wrong. You see I too believe in laws, in as far as they they are generally necessary for society. Not always in their morality and intent but never the less, I also recognize that laws are not absolute. They have no actual power besides the power we all collectively decide to give them. Thus not everyone can/will/ or even should follow laws, and when you base society around the expectation that everyone will follow the law or even that all laws will be objectively moral and worth following you are putting not only your own life at risk but the lives of everyone in said society. As I said previously we already have limits to freedom in that one persons freedoms end when another persons begins, we don't need more. And yes weapons are entitled to U.S. citizens based on the 2nd amendment of the United States Constitution. Me owning a gun in no way makes my life miserable, quite the opposite in fact it makes me feel safer. So if for some reason me making myself feel safer makes some else feel unsafe that can only mean that said person had intent to do me harm, so they should feel miserable. Obviously people shouldn't just break the law, I never said they should. But people WILL break the law, people DO break the law, and in the cases where they do I want to be in the position to protect myself in the best way I can, as everyone has the right to just in case. Because there will always be bad people in this world, they will use anything from a gun to a knife to a bomb. So in the event ;however unlikely it may be; that I am confronted with a situation that puts my life in danger from people operating outside of the law I want as great of a chance at me protecting myself as possible. IE a fire arm. sorry about such long essays
    1
  2730.  @kenny6920  My freedoms in no way conflict with reality. I would imagine the creators of the greatest country in the world would know what they are talking about in regards to what the country should be founded upon. It's fine if you don't trust someone with a gun, but it isn't your right to take someone's gun away because you don't trust them. We already screen first responders, but in regards to non lethal options being given to cops that would not reduce deaths. When a cop is given a taser for example they are more likely to use it on a person compared to a gun leading to more deaths over all compared to if they didn't have a taser. This is why cops now need to have a certain amount of training and experience before even being issued a taser. There are plenty more ways to kill people besides a gun, remember George Floyd? It is literally stated in the second amendment "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" This isn't a matter of interpretation , its very outwardly expressed by the founding fathers that they wanted to arm the populace of the country. If they didn't then why would they even add it. The entire country of America start as a bunch of rebels seceding from an oppressive government, its literally what the country was built on. I never said my goal was to strictly curb gun violence even though it would be desired, and I never said the more guns you have the less gun crime you have. I have attempted however to explain that reducing the amount of guns a countries populace has does not reduce the amount of crime that occurs as I mention with the Australia example. Hell it doesn't even reduce the amount of GUN crime a country has. The U.S. has more guns than any other country but MUCH less gun crime compared to them. Reducing guns wouldn't even slow down gun deaths because as I said, criminals don't obtain their guns legally, so making it harder for legal gun owners to get guns wont reduce the amount of guns criminals have. And like I said before, more crimes are PREVENTED using guns than are committed using guns. A country having more guns does not make it easier for more gun deaths to occur, those 2 variables are simply not correlated. If you want to make people safer that's more of a problem with mental health than it is guns. Not allowing someone to have a gun who hasn't even committed a crime just because they aren't up to some arbitrary standard of mental aptitude is an awful idea. Take the elderly for example? A lot of elderly people are not as mentally capable as most of the general population. Are you seriously going to take away their only means to defend themselves because they're old? Like I said, obviously the amendments have limits, and I described to you exactly where said limits lie. The limit is precisely where you begin to infringe on another persons rights. You can say whatever you want to me all I have to do is walk away, however if you start following me around that's stalking which a crime. Just like I can't point my gun at you wildly or threaten you with it. That's called brandishing and it is also illegal. That is the equivalent of your example of the 1st amendments limitations, basically not pointing the gun at people. A more apt equivalent of taking away an innocent persons right to defend themselves would be if you made it illegal to say certain words. As I sure hope you can imagine that would be horrible. The United states military is realistically incapable of stealing this country from it's citizens. The US military couldn't even take Afghanistan from a bunch of mountain bandits after 2 DECADES. They couldn't even take Vietnam. And we have a much larger population and more weapons than both those country's combined. Not to mention that OUR military is currently based out OUR country. We own this country not the government. If we wanted to take this country from the military it would be an inevitability. Apart from commiting actual genocide against the country's populace the United States military has absolutely no chance at defeating the population of the USA. How would it serve the people to give the state MORE power? If anything we should actively be trying to take power AWAY from the government, they already have too much. Governments don't exactly have the greatest track record. Hell it wouldn't be the first time in history a countries government betrayed its own people. No one is breaking any laws by simply preparing for the unlikely event that the united states government does for some reason turn on the people its meant to serve. Preparing for a fight isn't the same as taking action. It is literally just standing by and it would be rather foolish for people to not at least prepare for such a scenario given that it as it has happened so many times in the past already.
    1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. ​ @uru-annapace  No no, what your doing isn't simply acknowledging that genes play a role in performance, what your doing is saying that genes are the MAIN thing that gauge performance, as the term "freak show" implies. Which like I said is not only untrue but disparaging to those who work hard their entire live without said special genes. The people that do this usually are just trying to downplay the accomplishments of athletes in an attempt to make them feel better about themselves which I find repulsive. I never denied genes played a role, I just don't think they play the most important role when it comes to a persons performance at the Olympics or sports, which is what "freak show" implies. You cant disrespect science, its not a person, its not something created by a single person, its just a way of measuring a world, a tool, not some ideology. Saying you can disrespect science would be like saying measuring something with your eyes is disrespectful to a ruler... And again, your complaining to me about something I didn't start. I wasn't the one who introduced the example of a fictional character. But even if I WAS the one who Began using a fictional character as an example, FUCKING SO WHAT? You do realize humans have been doing that for millennia right? Using fictional examples and peoples to be able to convey their point in a way that is easier to understand? Like seriously what is your problem with that? Do you not like hypotheticals at all? If so you must HATE math because it is FULLY of hypotheticals, science as well. I'm starting to suspect that you honestly just feel compelled to constantly over complicate topics as a form of gate keeping so that you feel superior for understanding a "complex" topic. However this kind of intellectual gate keeping isn't an indication of intelligence, quite the opposite actually. Even an idiot ;especially idiots; can make a topic more complicated than it is or needs to be. Its often those who are well versed in the subject matter that can simplify a complex topic into something that even an idiot can understand. That's what metaphors are for and I seriously cannot understand your aversion to them to this extent other than the aforementioned gate keeping theory. And even when I was referring to the bruce wayne example it had NOTHING to do with genes, it was completely about how a person circumstances effect their abilities and who they become.
    1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488.  @marcusmeira5594  America being a federalist nation is based around the idea of everyone staying to themselves and minding their own business instead of trying to interfere in the business of their neighbors and trying to tell other people how to live their lives. Hence why its separated into 50 states. The nation was never meant to be a big homogeneous country so naturally the publics outlook towards other countries would be one even FURTHER removed as we are basically a bunch of seperate countries ourselves and basically feel we have everything we could ever need right here in our own country. Twice removed from the concerns of other countries. Unfortunately attempts keep getting made to force cohesion between all the states and all the people living in said states which leads to problems. Instead of letting the states naturally segregate themselves into their own territory's we have some over arching power forcing one groups will over everyone else. The pandemic was a good example of government over reach forcing every state to adhere to the same rules instead of each state doing what worked for them. And when it comes to most americans views on the war in ukraine its something seemingly happening a world away that has no bearing on their lives. Interesting to be sure but nothing they need to care about. Hell even in world war 2 most Americans wanted nothing to do with it until the japanese bombed pearl harbor. Its hard enough for americans to interact with each other, led alone the rest of the world. When it comes to the US being nosy in regards to other countries that is basically reserved for the US government, something the american public have very little say in. Most Americans take a rather isolationist stance when it comes to the government interfering in the affairs of other countries.
    1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534.  @SkyForgeVideos  Thats not what straw manning is and it is a scientific fact that internet porn effects the the human MUCH differently than any other form of porn that ever EVER had in human history. Its not an opinion. And you wrong about the history of sex by the way, just because seedy places like brothels existed doesn't mean they were as prevalent as you make them out to be. Its like saying that because murder happens that everyone was and is constantly killing each other its a logical fallacy. It use to be for the majority of the history of marriage, if you got someone pregnant, then you were either married or on the way to becoming married. Such a structure is the most beneficial to raising the next generation. But after contraception was invented people became less responsible and more sexual promiscouous, leading to a lot of modern day issues such as the ever increasing amount of single parent hood which is also proven to be massively detrimental to a childs growth, and they proceed stay that way into adult hood. So why shouldn't you be ashamed? You doing something moral repugnant. It's people like you who are constantly trying to get rid of the concept of shame that are often the most disturbed individuals. Its like asking why shouldnt people be disgusted by smoking or gambling or drugs or disease, because they are HARMFUL, not only to the individual to but to ALL of society. It is REALLY sad and gross that your so addicted that you would be willing to defend it this much, that your brain has classified porn as so important to you that you cant live without it.
    1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611.  @devilofether6185  Yes it is indeed your fault, you directly contributed to it like every other person in America who has a phone and you KNEW how the phone was made so you have no excuse as to why you bought it when you could have not bought if you really cared about alleviating suffering abroad. You try to make it sound like the phone is nessecary for you to live when its not, making excuses as to why you need it? And yes, the risk are socialized because its all of society that engages with the product that the individual is rewarded for. Us you want to susggest that only 1 person each should be able to buy anything from anyone else. Everyone profits from sweat shops even people like you that profit by having less expensive items that you get from said sweat shops. The market itself not caring about humans rights is irrelevant, thats not the markets job its an inanimate object. Thats the job of the people within the market, the market is just a reflection of humans. No one is forcing anyone to work in first world countries, if you dont want to be apart of the market you can very easily just leave it and become a hermit in the woods somewhere and live off the land, but you don't want to do that because you like having what the market ALLOWS to exist the, conviences it affords. So yes you are just as responsible. Most billionaires got their wealth on their own, or if you want to downplay their accomplishments they simply got lucky. The elon musk emerald mine myth has been debunk already btw. You dont have to invent something to be the thing that revolutionizes it in a field, Thomas Edison didnt invent the entire light bulb he only invented a part of it but the part he did invent was one of the most substantial developments TO the lightbulb thus why he gets the credit. People didn't vote on lots of things in the constitution because they were never suppose to, the US isnt a total democracy, far from it, its a constitutional republic, even more it has the electoral college. And yes there is a reason prisoners get their rights taken away, because they infringed on the rights of others. Not hard to understand and its a good thing they get their rights taken away for not respecting the rights of others.
    1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1