Comments by "Lynott Parris" (@DenUitvreter) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

Most have same other psychological disorder like autism or something at the same time. It's a desperate attempt to fit in it seems, purely superficial. For teenagers looks are much more important, how can they choose for looks at the expense at sexual function for the rest of their lives when they even haven't been in love yet, had sex and even the desire to is affected by drugs? The biggest problem is with the psychologists, they go well beyond their expertise. A kid feeling better after treatment is the measure of success in regular treatment, and rightly so. But this kind of treatment has effect for the rest of their lives, that can't be judged after a year in a teen's life when the kid gets lots of attention, believes it's going to fit in soon and has had mood changing drugs, which hormones are too. The bitter irony is that when treatment starts early, boys can develop a micro penis that has simply too little tissue to make a vagina out of.
8
I vaguely remember something with a voting app and Buttigieg beating him too.
5
The EU members have freedom of speech too, either constitutional or the ECHR treaty, and it's only marginally more limited than in the USA. The problem is that the executive and legeslative branche no longer respect the rule of law, especially since covid, and judges believe their opinions are above the meaning of constitutions and treaties.
4
That has been used to give us more and more to tolerate. Tolerance is a virtue but situation in which you have to tolerate a lot are not good things. We shouldn't be stretched to the max by our government.
3
@MihzvolWuriar Make that two. I know many people think it's beautiful but to me it sounds like they are complaining and moaning all day.
3
The question is now whether a rapist belongs in a women's jail when it's a women with a penis.
2
Do the numbers still matter though? A couple of hundreds of millions is peanuts to those who have much more to win from public opinion going their way.
2
I am not going to discredit NdGT's merits as a science teacher and popularizer, but he doesn't have the personality for a scientist. He's a sucker for authoriy, he needs to be led so he can follow. He loves 'scientific' bodies to tell him how it is and then obey and demand obedience from others. He does not question, not the facts and not authority. He treats proclaimed scientists as high priests communicating divine wisdom to us. Scientists are people who question things and certainly authority, who ware curious and want to know, who are amused when things turn out to be different from how they thought they were.
2
@Kayavod I remember him telling about what Van Leeuwenhoek saw through his microscope in 17th century Dutch Republic, micro-organisms, and he was all excited about how the scientific authority, the Royal Society checked his findings. The Royal Society was a great idea to get more exchange of knowledge and science in England, which was struggling with the scientific revolution, it had no authority whatsoever and certainly not in the Dutch Republic over a very successfull cloth merchant and hobby scientist like Van Leeuwenhoek who knew he made the best/first miscroscope of the word. He did write to the Royal Society, which was still in it's infancy, just like he wrote his findings to other European scientists, because that is what enthousiastic scientists do. But NdGT is such a sucker for a body of authority putting it's stamp on it and say 'this is official science and therefore fact now' . He desperately needs 'science' to be something official, coming from the top down, people who say 'this is approved science, and the rest isn't'. That's a fundamentally unscientific attitude. If science was up to be people like him, Einstein and Newton would still be a 100% right because they are his gods. They weren't, not a 100%, because they were scientists.
2
Not just pure misery. Insecurity wants confirmation by other people doing the same thing, bad habits have to be justified by being shared too. Drinkers will push alcohol on people, same with drugs, I'm not opposed to drink and drugs at all but I have noticed the tendency to want to drag others in. They just want to share, not because they are evil but because they think they are being nice while being very selfish in their quest for confirmation of their habits they deep down have second thoughts on.
1
The issue is that women have made defining manhood and masculinity about themselves. We should define men as opposed to boys, because that is how the individual supposed to progress. Being obsessed with toys like fast cars, being highly competitive and flexing for the mirror a lot is very boyish. So in that sense the masculine influencers don't really get it and send the wrong message because they have let the debate be hijacked by women.
1
Sharing a place is already quite something but you have to truly share it to be one community. Lots of Dutch muslims voted for Wilders and many others respect him for standing up for Dutch culture and values. Being internationally minded, welcoming and a melting pot has been Dutch culture for ages. Not mincing wordst too and Wilders can be a bit coarse. The Dutch have had freedom of religion since 1579, when it was codified in the Union of Utrecht. There have always been different religions, lots of different denominations too, with different values living together here when catholics and protestants were still mass killing eachother everywhere else. The problem with muslims from muslim countries, Wilders is explicitely opposed to mass immigration from muslim countries, not opposed to any muslim immigrant, is that they expect islam to rule, rule the streets, the public spaces, the debate, allowed expression, blasphemy laws, etc. That's where it clashes with Dutch culture. They often don't understand that their freedom to be muslim in the Netherlands is the same right as everyone else's to be free from other people's religion and be as gay, blasphemous, judaistic, apostate or whatever as they want. If they understood that there is not much of a homogenity issue left. They will just be another addition to our wide range of religious nutcases.
1
The monster was created by allowing dumb people into university. University is about science, science is the advancement of knowledge and understanding which is naturally limited to the brightest minds. Dumb people will just take a false sense of authority like their ill thought through opinion matter from it, get confused by the complexity of the subjects and ideas, while their inner insecurity about their intelligence will make them seek confirmation by their peers and security in dogmas.
1
@theusher2893 No, the history of freedom goes back much further than the USA. But yes, men often had to go out and do dangerous work while women had the less dangerous but very important task of managing the whole household and home business.
1
Nice little Nurnberg rally there in the background.
1
The 80s were also the beginning of off shoring, financialization, international tax evasion and the oligarchy. Be careful what you wish, I'd advise good old productive capitalism.
1
He speaks English. It's not the only word or name in English that reflects the English historic ignorance about the rest of the world.
1
There was no new Hitler but we've certainly seen a new Goebbels.
1
As a Dutchman (443 years an independent country) I feel she is on to a good metaphore that has crosses my mind more than once, the USA tends to change it's mind a bit quicker, tends to extremes, a bit wild, materialistic, competitive, energetic. But the problematic puberty is with the depressed, automutiling, identity confused, self neglecting, obsessed over her looks, often hysteric side which is the Democrats.
1
The population density argument is false because most Swedes live in compact cities. It's nonsense to assume people are evenly spread over the whole country.
1