Youtube comments of (@JakeRoeder).
-
161
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To your first question, solar and wind are (of course) not continual sources of energy, nor are they uniform suppliers. This means that it doesn't always make as much sense for a given location to invest in these options, even if we had enough energy storage to completely convert tomorrow. The second question is actually really great to think about. First that transmission lines would need to change to adapt to the new supply/demand requirements, but also that modernizing the transmission would make it easier to shift energy around to where the demand is (assuming centralization of energy generation still), so how do you design for that now is not an easy question to answer. Also, depending on where you live, the transmission lines might be privately owned, not publicly, so there are challenges there as well. There are many other ways of storing energy than batteries, such as pumped storage, flywheels, and molten salts. The challenge is getting the holy grail of safe, efficient, and reactive enough to demand spikes that is where we need to end up. I also like nuclear power, myself, but as alluded to in the video, because it heats up water to turn a turbine, it has more end-to-end losses than solar and wind.
1
-
1