Youtube comments of Serenity\x27s Solace (@serenityssolace).
-
1200
-
644
-
474
-
450
-
439
-
172
-
171
-
157
-
139
-
130
-
128
-
121
-
121
-
111
-
101
-
94
-
92
-
88
-
83
-
81
-
78
-
73
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
65
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
59
-
58
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
This video is totally misleading. They said nothing scientific that proves that 5G isn't dangerous. There are over 200 scientists worldwide that have PhD on RFR technology and made an appeal to the EU to stop 5G deployment because it is proved dangerous. All these videos trying to prove that 5G isn't dangerous base their lies on that the frequencies of 5G are non ionising and that only ionising radiation is dangerous. That's plain wrong. It is scientifically proven that non ionising radiation has serious health effects to human body just like ionizing radiation. The only difference is that the damage is being created a lot slower. For example, if you stay at chernobyl after explosion, in a few hours you will die. You will get the same effects with 5G radiation, but it could take 10 years till you get cancer. There is also an amazing video from a Greek scientist that was the head of a EU science research on RFR and proved how dangerous all G technologies are. It totally disproved this video, and with absolute scientific proof. I am going to try and translate it, if they give me their permission. Also there are countries that stopped 5G deployment for healthy concerns. Are these countries conspiracy theorists? From what I know, the first rule in public health, is to not use a technology that hasn't been researched enough for its health consequences. So why are they ignoring that simple rule? Even big company officials admitted that there hasn't been enough research. Even if 5G is totally healthy, it will bring an era of ULTIMATE AND UNSTOPPABLE surveillance state with the internet of things. The complete death of privacy. Also there haven't been enough studies of possible side effects on other organisms and animals. All these conglomerates claim they care for the environment, and deploy such technologies. There hasn't been even 10 studies that could tell us possible consequences for the bees.Who knows how these frequences could disorient them and hurt them. To accept something new without enough research is paranoid, and no one seems to care anymore. Why?
Here is the 5G appeal from scientists
http://www.5gappeal.eu/
Here is the EU document that clearly tells of possible side effects to human health
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/646172/EPRS_BRI(2020)646172_EN.pdf
Please like this comment so people can see it! Always be critical in thinking and don't take things for granted without making your personal research
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@theBallisticMystic Well, before I entered the military, I believed that soldiers were actually doing something very productive for the security of the country. That they were training, practising useful things that would increase the chances of both protecting the country (which is the so to say the duty of a soldier) and their survival in case of war. Many people look down on them because often they cause trouble. Let me explain. In places where military camps are stationed, a soldier is granted an exit for a certain amount of hours per week or per month (in rare cases twice a week). This depends on how many soldiers are available in every camp, so that they can complete certain tasks which are useless. Like staying at watchtowers and watch if anything suspicious happens, while at the same time, having cameras that can do exactly this job. Whatever, the thing is, that because the service is mandatory, and many officers of higher rank are really old minded, mental abuse can be quite often in the camps. And once they get their exit (the soldiers), they blow steam off in a way that causes trouble to citizens, get drunk, sometimes they get into fights with other men, for women. Keep in mind that almost all men lose their girlfriends when entering the army. Also every 3 months, new recruits are coming in. That means that the previous recruits are now considered more experienced, and bully the new recruits also to blow steam off. But they themselves were 3 months earlier the victims of this bullying. And instead of understanding this problem, and stop it, they spread it aswell to the next recruits. That makes me look down on them the most. Of course that doesn't include every soldier. Some of them are amazing people. But still there are a lot of them doing this malpractice. And this is the same for higher ranked military men. If you are unlucky, you can end up with some very old minded people, and they are happy to abuse you with their power and authority and privilege because of their higher rank.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
As someone that has some pretty effed up kinks myself including the Master/Slave thing and more BDSM stuff in general I would like to say a lot of things. (I can share those in a sense because of my annonimity and for the sake of the argument). First of all I view myself as conservative and I am a fan and supporter of you Matt Walsh. The topic here is a very difficult one and I feel there's no absolute white or black answer.
First of all I would like to say that I don't like the idea of kink shaming (obviously because I would be shamed as well) but I understand where you are coming from. I also see that western society has gone too far the deep end and thus a purge in some kind of way is necessary as a reset. That being said my belief is that kinks shouldn't be shamed but they should also not be proudly advertised to gain clout. It's something private, it's something oftentimes perverse and it should be kept between the people that mutually consent to participate in those practices.
04:00 Sounds very disgusting, concerning and upsetting. Now I would be a hypocrite to shame her since I don't want to be shamed myself. Or maybe I am ready to be shamed myself. And I don't really know if that particular kink is still fine because even if these people consent to be drugged and then used as masturbatory aid, is that really consent once you have no consciousness? It's very ironic how these people are the first to complain and claim that consent can't be given in an unconscious state (eg. husband waking up his wife while she sleeps with oral sex and wife has given consent for that prior) but drugging people in order to eff them up is ok. I guess if all participants really consent it's fine, but don't advertise it, don't normalize it to that extent. Because it's not normal. If this get's normalized what will come next? Necrophilia? Pedophilia? And once those get normalized cause that's their agenda, what horrifying extremes are waiting in line? What will happen to wholesome vanilla sex? That's what SHOULD BE SHAMED. THE ADVERTISEMENT OF KINKS SHOULD BE SHAMED. NOT THE KINKS THEMSELVES. In my opinion atleast. Also I think shaming is different and more ill intended than constructive criticism which should never be censored or discouraged.
05:30 Also very controversial and indeed, ''grape'' fantasies/kinks and CNC (consensual non consent) acts exist and many people have them and want to explore them. What you say from that point till 07:21 is spot on. I absolutely agree with the fact that there's material, psychological and spiritual significance in sex that can cause mental health issues if the sex/kinks are in a way degrading and dehumanizing/objectifying. But many of us in the BDSM scene are aware of that. That's why we have the term ''aftercare'' which in a sense is emotional reinforcement of whatever took place in the act/roleplay was just that and isn't really meant to be taken seriously. I understand that depending on the mental fortitude of each person, this might not be enough and still cause damage in the long term. That's why some acts should only be done after careful consideration and soul searching for all participants.
07:22 I have done that. And the reason is because I was a decade long porn addict that normalized those things in me. I understood too late the damage porn did to me, but now the damage has been done and can't be changed. Even if it can, the problem is that I don't want to change. Cause I desire those things. I am aware that my mind and spirit have been poisoned in some shape and form. 08:27 I absolutely agree, things like that should never be ignored. That's just an agenda.
10:15-10:28 I understand your logic and mostly agree to it, but I think sometimes a couple with weird preferences really enjoys degrading, demeaning, dehumanizing sex play. Is it a mental illness to enjoy that? Maybe, but maybe it's better than forcing them into a therapy that will have an opposite effect or than depriving them of the few things that actually gives them a sense of relief.
10:40 I completely agree. I believe that's why it's very important to have sex withing the bounds of a very serious, trustworthy and stable relationship or marriage. I think that's why many BDSM couples last longer than normal couples. Because BDSM can be so extreme, the values of showing knowing and understanding boundaries, cultivating communication with no judgements, and showing respect and aftercare are highlighted much more than in normal relationships. Because your partner won't abandon you after using and exploiting you so to speak. But in hookup culture, everything Matt says is true. In that regard he is absolutely right that consent being the start and end of it all is not enough.
Anyways, that's all I wanted to share with you. Guys, if you read until the end thanks a lot and please don't massacre me in the comments. I am all for respectful conversations and constructive criticisms. But no ill willed comments. God Bless everyone!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sheknows9704 NATO was bombing children and civilians in countries like Yugoslavia, Syria, Iraq. Also the US used barbaric torture methods in Iraq and Syria. Then the US never shied away from using chemical weapons against civilians. In Mosul and Raqqa (Iraq) the US used white phosphorus bombs which is banned under the Geneva convention. Agent Orange (another chemical) was widely used in the VIetnam war (so many children were born with deformities and their life ruined). Also there is evidence of the US using mustard gas in the middle east. Also recently there was this outrage that Australian soldiers (not NATO member but supposedly belongs to the west) were committing war crimes in Afghanistan, killing children and civilians for fun. My advice is: Don't try to justify anyone during wars. There's no moral superiority in war. War dehumanizes people, it turns them into savages drunk on power. Wether Western, Russian, Asian, African, Muslim, if you are in a war and have more power than your enemy, this power compels your animalistic instincts to be set free and to torture your victim in the most gruesome way possible before you kill him. People get drunk on the feeling of dominating others
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I disagree with restrictions on social media and on comments. It's against the freedom of speech. It doesn't solve the root of the problem, it's more like a firewall against the problem. In my opinion TV shows like this, which remind me of Big Brother should be terminated. Because once you take part in it, you lose all your privacy for a long time. And you can't act non stop for such a long time. Your true self will be revealed. This goes for all people. All people have flaws, and aren't perfect. But that's exactly the opposite of the TV/Celebrity world. When you are live, everyone expects you to be perfect, like the TV acting standards. In case you can't hide your natural self, people will hate on you. That goes for me, for Nobita, for everyone that reads this comment. So big brother-like shows that expect of the participants to be perfect role models, are polar opposites to human nature, which has good aspects, and flaws. Inevitably anyone that takes part in such shows and with his own consent publicizes his entire life, should expect that he will be hated on. If you can't handle hate, then simply stop sharing your entire life online, disappear from the internet, but not from life itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@testtestsson4927 Yes, clean the streets of cities, tend to the needs of illegal immigrants, fix military cars, move around military material, clean the toilets of the generals, paint the walls and do other conservation work, clean weaponry and military equipment, build tents, extinguish flames wherever a fire starts, help out with natural disasters when catastrophe strikes, clean dishes of soldiers. In my opinion the only worthwhile work was extinguishing flames and helping people striked by natural disasters
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shimisun3555 Your comment shows that you're ignorant. Nr 1 example, the US mass media hate their government and does everything in it's power to defame President Trump. Almost no western government cares about it's country's development. They are all traitors and daily make new laws to make their people's lives worse and to destroy their countries. They are all bribed by big companies, lobbyists and communists. When it comes to China, you can only walk safely outside as long as you kiss the CCP's ass. Once you go against their authoritarian will, they will find you no matter where. Your government doesn't give a ** about your wellbeing. If it cared, it wouldn't create a dystopian technocratic environment where it completely monitors all your actions. Especially now where it wants to establish the social credit system which rewards citizens for snitching on each other's ''wrongdoings'' like passing the street with a red light while no car is passing and then getting your rewards. They push down your throats a system that rewards citizens for making their co-citizens life a nightmare. Camaraderie is completely wiped out. And if you don't get good citizen credit, you get lockdowned, you aren't allowed external or domestic tourism, you have to pay higher taxes, you're being put into even harder watchlist and maybe interrogation and other things. The facade of a freedom you believe your country offers you, will sooner or later fade for you as well. The only ones who understood that where the people of HK, and you saw what happened to them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I follow alot of stuff that has to do with former Soviet Union members and I would suggest you to have an open mind about what is going on in those countries. Sure they aren't saints, but they are far more democratic than China. In Ukraine for example, the entire chaos in 2015 was caused by the USA government. Russia only protected the people that were about to get eliminated by the corrupt Ukrainian government. But to understand this fully and not toss it aside as Russian propaganda, one must delve very deep into it and dedicate lot's of time. I can't be sure, but these remind me of colour revolutions and paid protesters from billionaires like George Soros. Like he did with the black panthers and the anarchy that rose in Seattle (CHAZ,CHOP) and paying millions for hating campaigns against Trump. As for retaining the traditional values and keeping stability in tact, I wouldn't ridicule this idea. Actually I also embrace it. I live in Germany, and of course things are great here compared to there, but the past few years I must admit that ethical and sexual degeneracy is alarmingly increasing. Of course I wouldn't want to live there, cause I understand that it's not perfect there, but when it comes to protecting stability and traditional and family values, they are right. Also I would like to add that a purely democratic leader can much easier be bribed than an authoritarian figure. That ties in the scenario where Belarus becomes purely democratic. Then with bribery and deals, Belarus joins the EU, NATO etc. And NATO will station troops and bases directly in the house front of Russia encircling it even more. No other nation in the world had such an imperialistic attidute towards Russia than the US after WW2. The USA even broke the rules and treaties of NATO enlarging it with more and more countries completely encircling Russia. Of course Russia feels threatened. That's why Russia considers sending troops to Belarus. And rightly so. The US would feel the same if Russia or China stationed nukes on military bases in Cuba or Canada. That's what the US is doing. One shouldn't only report from ones side perspective. It just comes off as hypocritical. In geopolitics there is no good and bad side. Both the west and Russia have made lots of illegal actions. Especially the USA, it's just good at hiding it's crimes. No other country bombed as many countries as the USA. The USA stopped all it's wars once Trump took office. And that gives it the chance to redeem itself. The only country capable of committing more crimes than the USA is China. The world needs balance. It needs US and Russia with good relationship. And if those cooperate, then the CCP can be defeated. The US needs to stop pushing Russia into China's arms. Sorry for the long read. Mixed it all I guess, but wanted to share some views and points.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1