Comments by "" (@jojowynne233) on "KILLER Mushroom Mystery Deaths In Australia Explained | Piers Morgan Uncensored" video.

  1. I’m an Aussie and I reckon she did it! The attempt on hubby didn’t work, he lived. So all the in-laws sit down to lunch, 3 are dead almost immediately, one is barely hanging one. Yet her and the kids are fine. Why are the police picking up a dehydrator from the dump? Why did she need to dehydrate fresh mushrooms? To make them so small she could cut them up and hide them in the rest of the meal. That way if anyone said I don’t like mushrooms, she didn’t have to worry, they’d be eating them without knowing it. That’s my theory. The cops know she did it, they have to be able to prove it.
    159
  2.  @seaofghosts  of course I do! My theories aren’t going to affect what Vic Pol do. This is so much more suspicious than Lindy’s case. I was one of the people that believed her back then in 1980 and I was only a teen with a huge interest in animals. When Cleo Smith disappeared most of us believed the parents, and were right. This mushroom case is pretty stinky! The Criminologist in me sees a pattern with the hubby and everyone else is dead or almost dead except her and the kids. Pretty hard not to have an opinion or theorise on this one. It’s not necessarily judging.
    29
  3.  @elfkey1409  yep blokes do tend to ignore pain etc until it puts them in an Ambo. I’m thinking hubby was the test subject as we both do, but she underestimated the dose needed to off him. So this time she made sure by making the mushy’s smaller by dehydrating them and that way she could deliver a higher dose without them knowing it. Maybe I just have the mind of an evil woman 😂😂 Kidding! I’m a Criminology student.
    15
  4.  @meredithisme3752  Good point! That to me is another big red flag. If you’re serving a food to your guests that you and your kids normally love to eat, why wouldn’t you eat them too? Unless you knew there was something wrong with them.
    10
  5.  @lostintheseventies7969  Hey fellow Aussie! Love your YouTube name. The 70’s rocked. Yep glad you’re on board. 🎶
    4
  6.  @philmorton4590  well he was poisoned, I didn’t make that up.
    4
  7.  @elephantintheroom5678  I’ve got good news for you then. I’m neither hysterical nor gleeful. Hysterical refers to wildly uncontrolled emotion. I’m definitely not screaming wildly in hysteria over something that does not affect me. I’m not gleeful or happy that people are dead and one life hangs in the balance. You’re use of language is over emotive. As you may have seen in my previous replies I’m looking at this purely from the view of a Criminologist. There are many red flags and comparing them to Lindy Chamberlain is becoming pointless because let’s face it, yes the public totally condemned her but, the jury found her guilty. Overturned years later due to an unfortunate suicide and the matinee jacket being found but not relevant to this at all when a jury judged her guilty. Anyway, I do appreciate that we can have different opinions without being hysterical 😀, so we’ll agree to disagree and I will respect that you don’t wish to judge her.
    3
  8.  @GenZedsMother  Thank you. I appreciate it. 🙏
    2
  9.  @saliadee2564  I can’t imagine dehydrated mushrooms bouncing back to what they were when added to food or whatever she made. In my opinion only there are too many red flags. It’s not just one. Also cops still have to have evidence and proof to take to trial before they can even arrest her, so that may not happen. I will respect your opinion.
    2
  10.  @seaofghosts  I understand what you are saying. Cops may not even arrest her unless they have enough evidence to take her to trial. So we will see what happens there. In the meantime even though we disagree, I truly respect your opinion.
    2
  11.  @elephantintheroom5678  you don’t have to be a Criminologist to know that a person is innocent until proven guilty. You don’t even know me at all to make any assumptions. FYI I go to Griffith University School of Criminology. I did not claim to be an expert only that I view this case through a Criminology lens. Perhaps you’d like to reread my comment, it’s not edited. There’s never a reason to be rude to people either. I agreed to disagree with you. Yes I thought your hysterical and gleeful comments were directed at me, I didn’t see anyone else that you were aiming them at. If you weren’t then that’s great. It’s now after midnight so I’m turning off my phone. Have a pleasant evening.
    2
  12.  @elephantintheroom5678  by the way, I never said juries were infallible. They most definitely are. For a huge variety of reasons. I agree with you on that point so I don’t know why you think I don’t?
    2
  13.  @The_huntress111  Hi there 👋 Oh there are a couple of them in there that disagree and one in particular gets quite rude about it. 😂😂
    2
  14.  @chinchilla1956  so true!
    2
  15.  @silverstorm1000  exactly right! Now she’s saying she topped up her mushy supply with some from the local Asian grocer. Bloody rude!
    2
  16.  @SmartDumbNerdyCool  it’s so creepy and insidious that a person you know could do that to your food. I did read this morning that farmer!s markets, organic growers and even supermarkets are having to reassure people of the stringent procedures they are all under selling mushrooms. It’s big business. So you can kill people and reek havoc on an industry with your alibi. I love your YouTube name 💛
    2
  17.  @elfkey1409  😂😂
    1
  18.  @crown8144  thanks. I’m sticking my neck out there. Too many red flags for me. Still the cops have to have enough evidence to arrest her for a trial so it’s still a wait and see if there’s even proof.
    1
  19.  @elephantintheroom5678  The point was a jury found Lindy Chamberlain guilty. Not just the public. So why are we comparing this old 1980 case to the current Mushroom case when she hasn’t even been arrested. I’ve also stated that she may never be unless Vic Pol have enough evidence to take her to trial, she won’t even be arrested. That in no way says that I think juries are infallible. I have no idea how you got to that determination. It has nothing to do with my English and comprehension. I won’t even go as low as to say it’s yours. I think these forums, just like text messages can be misconstrued.
    1
  20.  @paulweston285  very clever 😂😂
    1
  21.  @williamporter2867  thank you for your politeness. I do understand that is what they are saying, about the rush to judgement. I believe that she is guilty, that is what I can tell you. There are too many things that are adding up to her being guilty. If I am wrong, then I am wrong. I’m just one person, and I know there’s a few likes on my comment but there are also many that disagree. I’m so happy for that. I don’t want us all to have the same opinion, just respectful conversations. 🩵
    1
  22.  @The_huntress111  yep! The cops will work very hard on this case I’m sure of it. It’s a mass murder. I hope Ian pulls through. If he does he might shed some light on the situation.
    1
  23.  @The_huntress111  That’s so lovely, you’re the first one to mention that. RIP Heather, Gail and Don 🌹 Prayers for Ian 🕯️ 🙏
    1
  24.  @annalisette5897  Exactly right. I did see the Under Investigation 60 minutes did on her. It’s on YouTube now. She went to the dump that was furthest away and from memory tried to hide it under items. You’re so right Anna, bleach or other disinfectants would’ve destroyed any evidence as chemicals do. Erin claimed she dumped it in a panic because ex hubby Simon said something about “is that what you used to murder my parents with”? Speaks more to a guilty conscience doesn’t it? Ill put the link in here for The Behaviour Panel who are the best body language experts and they did an analysis of Erin from the media interview. It was really good and in the 2nd or latter half of the video. https://youtu.be/8RzqVAsaq6c?si=V8zFZu6Wgb9Xjiz0
    1